Chomper Higgot

Look who defends it.

You presume a lot of things, almost always entirely incorrectly. Try fact based discussions and avoiding personal attacks, they might together help you stay on topic.

Please point out where in the OP or the linked article the statement is made that the example individual was trafficked?

I’m not at all surprised. We know from past reports of migrant worker abuse that powerful people are often in the background. It doesn’t in and of itself make the migrant a ‘trafficked person’. Oh, and there’s that visa again.

You’d need a very loose interpretation of that to apply it to this example given. Even the individual and the organization helping her aren’t claiming she was trafficked. There is no suggestion anywhere in the OP or the linked article that she and her family have been trafficked. That was a contribution from your very own imagination.

I’m not sure that is the definition of human trafficking. Perhaps best not to assert human trafficking without evidence and facts.

Forgive me, I posted the link earlier in the thread, and have reposted above. I have no expectation of anyone being a mind reader but I do expect, perhaps futilely so, that people engaged in a discussion would follow the discussion.

Forgive me Vinny, I assumed you could navigate through the thread:

That’s alright, she’s got a visa. No evidence of it being one of the ‘fake visas’ you referred to, and zero evidence of the ‘human trafficking’ you threw into the discussion. Oh and the thread is the whole OP not the single bit you wish to misrepresent.

A link to what, I’ve referred you to the OP, you’ll find it at the top of the thread.

The OP refers to ‘the UK care sector’ and the included article refers to at least 109 cases.

No need to apologize, I never made any such claim.

To point out the salient bit you are failing to address.

Refer title of thread for a clue.

There is absolutely no indication in the report of visa status being anything to do with the example cases given or human trafficking, in fact the report makes it clear the woman in the example case had a visa. But off you go, banging on about ‘sounds like people trafficking’ and fake visas. Predictable!

“Reports of modern slavery double in UK care sector”

So immigrants are not providing care in the UK care homes? “Reports of modern slavery double in UK care sector” Care sector Clearly the single case discussed in the report is not the only case and very clearly the fact she works in one are of the care sector does not preclude all the rest of the care sector, refer Nottingham University report I linked above.

Clearly there’s such a thing as a strawman argument.

Which might explain this unsubstantiated guesswork of yours:

Like I said earlier, let your imagination fill in the gaps.

This makes interesting reading, 2019 so not something that suddenly shows up without any prior warnings: https://www.nationalcareforum.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/MSEU-Briefing_Modern-slavery-risk-in-adult-social-care_FINAL.pdf

I suspect most people’s stories are not all true. Are you doubting the existence of people subjected to treatment that meets the legal definition of slavery within the UK’s care industry?

Let your imagination fill the gaps.

Maybe they aren’t.

Actually it does nothing of the sort.