Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    37,766
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. The inconvenient truth is while it is being asserted Jews can’t safely walk in the streets due to the protests, there are Jews regularly attending in the protests.
  2. Absolutely. And my first post in this thread addresses the authoritarian laws now in place. Did the protestors (not a mob) actually threaten anyone?
  3. Because he is an activist, the head of an activist organization engaging in activism.
  4. Probably a matter of numbers would be my guess. Oh and pro-peace!
  5. More pejorative assertions. Guilt by association in your own head.
  6. No I’m not. I think policing a demonstration is probably a very difficult thing with decision needing to be made in real time in what can be a fast moving situation. Hind sight is a luxury. I understand the activist is safe, there was no breach of the peace. That’s a good thing, don’t you agree?
  7. What about all the protestors who aren’t Muslim? Or have you just said the quiet bit out loud?! Maybe stick to the events under discussion, refrain from imagining scenarios that haven’t taken place and in doing so keep your ‘other issues’ under your hat.
  8. You need to go back and read the post I was responding to. 1. Response to an accusation of a single police officers behavior being used to impugn the integrity of whole 46,000 officers and staff of the Met. 2. My statement “Keeping the peace and protecting people against harm is a prime duty of the Police.” Is not in any sense a saying “the Police (as a whole) acted correctly in threatening to arrest the Jew.” I would go as far as to say you have completely misrepresented my statements.
  9. Yes should and he has the right to do so. But if he is risking a breach of the peace then he should also follow the Police’s lawful instructions.
  10. Or go looking for a bit of publicity at risk to public order. More baseless accusations of ‘pro-Palestinian blah blah’.
  11. I see, just get rid of the right to protest.
  12. Yes. Keeping the peace and protecting people against harm is a prime duty of the Police.
  13. When leader of Jewish activist group engages in performative grandstanding risking a breach of the peace might be a better description. On the upside, the police de-escalated the situation and the activist is safe and well.
  14. I hope you look forward the opening arguments as much as I do. I recommend paying close attention.
  15. “The people who would ‘rip another person to shreds’” So call people ‘animals’ on the basis of something that hasn’t happened?
  16. No I’m not. No I’m not. If you won’t say what you mean then don’t engage in innuendo.
  17. Why do I need to watch the video? I read the OP. Perhaps you’re looking for comment on the lighting, camera angle or framing.
  18. I’m sure some supported the authoritarian laws suppressing freedom to protest and freedom of assembly that they were told would be used against at people they had been told to hate/fear. Then those same laws were used against themselves. That’s how authoritarianism works. Anyway, you get the first Godwin Gong of the day.
  19. No. I’ve explained 1 in 46000. I don’t view videos posted in this discussion forum regardless of what side of any discussion they are on. What am I defending? Back to your usual innuendo Jonny. Grow a set and say what you mean.
×
×
  • Create New...