-
Posts
37,535 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
39
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Chomper Higgot
-
Why Mike Johnson’s perch has suddenly grown precarious
Chomper Higgot replied to Social Media's topic in World News
He might not be. There is no guarantee that the Republicans who are at each other’s throats could agree between them on a replacement. The party that can’t govern itself. -
Why Mike Johnson’s perch has suddenly grown precarious
Chomper Higgot replied to Social Media's topic in World News
Frog learns it wasn’t a good idea to give a scorpion a free ride. -
Stating that I have absolutely no doubt you have not wasted any police time is not the same thing as stating, or even indicating, that the police would not waste time on your [claimed] report of [your asserted] Yousef’s race rant’. They might, for example never have received any such report. Or it might go straight in the trash folder as being a report of an alleged hate incident that predates the law.
-
A great deal of auto-grievance stroking and lots of references to race from people usually keen to scream ‘race card’ whenever the matter of race comes up. And of course a total ignorance of the fact the law is not ‘retrospective’ and has no applicability to any alleged hate crimes that took place before the law came into place.
-
I did not ‘indicate the police would not waste time on your [claimed] report of [your asserted] Yousef’s race rant’. Get back to us when the police advise you if reports of alleged hate incidents that predate the legislation are admissible under the new law. I absolutely agree, your post was an allegation of a conspiracy.
-
JK Rowling in ‘arrest me’ challenge over hate crime law
Chomper Higgot replied to Social Media's topic in World News
A language does need to be phonetic for any spelling of pronunciations to make sense. You can misspell any word you like, but how that miss spelled word ‘reads’ is dependent upon the accent of the reader. -
Which is precisely what Jack Smith is laying the groundwork’s for. Judge Cannon’s ruling is without any legal basis, it doesn’t rely on a single bit of case law, makes zero reference to any law, ruling or precedent. What her ruling does do is demonstrate bias in favor of the defendant. And there only needs to be ‘an appearance of bias’ to warrant recusal.