Chomper Higgot

Jack Smith has responded and directly challenges the Judge’s legally baseless ruling: ‘Writ of mandamus’ ! https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652/gov.uscourts.flsd.648652.428.0.pdf

I read that multiple times, still non the wiser on what it was meant to say.

Maybe it was some internet troll, there’s a lot of the about. Assuming a ‘pro trans lobby’ exists and have broken the law and of course the grievance laced assumption of what the law is for.

If that is indeed who made the threats. Pass any information you have on their identities to the police.

As stated above, Rowling hasn’t broken the law. Maybe she needs to push the envelope if she wants to be arrested. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/02/jk-rowling-will-not-be-arrested-under-new-scottish-hate-law-say-police

She’s not standing up for anything. She’s saying come and arrest me when she knows she hasn’t broken any laws.

You mean people who propose baiting Muslims with bacon at the start of Ramadan? Doesn’t it come from the same animal as that bacon of yours?

Agreed

That’s not any kind of a definition of hatred. But by all means, hate whoever you like, you just don’t get to spew it on them or incite others to hate. I do understand how for some this would be a challenging restriction to their behavior.

You assert ‘they are turning a blind eye’. Evidence? Perhaps evidence of her spewing hate? Or perhaps you don’t have any thing to back up this conspiracy of yours.

JKR has suffered online abuse, it’s exactly the kind of thing this laws addresses and calls for regulation of social media address. She’s not been arrested, she’s not being censored, she’s persecuted by anyone beyond the very kind of people she’s giving cover for. When did I ever use the term ‘TERFS’? My Ilk? Hate speech against Jews? And of course you add in conspiracy. You’re on a roll Jonny.

Except your ‘arguments’ add nothing, they have no basis in fact.

There’s nothing factual about your post.

Again, she hasn’t broken the law. So why would ‘they go after her’?

Precisely that. She’s chosen to become the poster child for bigots and transphobes stoking their self awarded grievance - poor poor me, I can’t spew hate on other people. Nobody has silenced JKR, nobody has censured her. If she wishes to debate the issue she can do so without reporting to hate mongering.

Precisely the kind of hate that this law addresses.

Oh so she didn’t display her ignorance on the matter of transgender books being burned?

Let’s be fair to JKR, perhaps she’s trying to distract from her last week’s idiot and historically illiterate offering that the Nazis didn’t burn any Transgender books. Maybe there’s a a pattern, ‘JKR’ has a problem with the existence of Transgender people and their existence, despite efforts to erase that existence, in the historical record.

While others make their own assumptions. eh!

In the interest of being fair minded I’ll read that again tomorrow morning after breakfast and a strong coffee to see if it makes any more sense than it does now.

My punt is running back to Nanny and the NHS to take care of him in his final years.

This:

JKR isn’t being persecuted. Welcome to the world of reality.

Shocking really. Oh but they got him in the end: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/apr/02/richard-burrows-uk-most-wanted-fugitives-arrested-cheshire-police

I think the over zealous fixation with transgender, particularly male transgenders to female is something thing that definitely warrants some research. Particularly when those exhibiting this odd fixation make reference to those upon whom they are fixated being ‘turned on’.