Chomper Higgot

I’ll make a stab at it. Donny is a sore loser.

Surely a question to put to Brexiteers who were warned about the implications of their self harm project on NI. Biden came with a carrot and a stick: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/12/joe-biden-us-investment-northern-ireland-power-sharing#:~:text=Joe Biden has dangled a,if power sharing is restored.

You called the trial wrong, don’t press it with your guess on the appeal.

Something doesn’t add up. We are frequently told that the root cause of the inflation the UK economy is suffering is due to supply side restrictions; oil and energy, food imports, manufacturing restrictions. Increasing interest rates is not a cure for supply side restrictions. It does however reduce business investment and increase unemployment. Perhaps someone believes labour shortages are giving workers too much economic leverage.

With a precise date, time and video footage attached.

Oh the drama! Have never heard the term. ’On or around’? As in, ‘on or around [insert date] the accused did [insert accusation]. Indictments, and convictions are frequently based on accusations that have no precise date or time.

Well it’s the wise and correct decision, but the extreme Brexiteers and disaster capitalists won’t like it.

Nobody likes a sore looser.

I’ve said all along, Washington will dictate NI policy to Downing Street. Having put itself in desperate need if trading partners the UK will do as it is told.

Congress May indeed make a recommendation to the DOJ for a formal criminal investigation. However, in doing so they need to provide some evidence of crimes.

The question yet to be answered is: Did Trump do for CNN or did CNN do for Trump?

What?

And even then…. Zero evidence of any criminality.

I certainly remember nonsense along those lines.

Von Der Leyen isn’t promulgating these regulations. AI regulation is not about what people are ‘allowed to see’. If it were, the regulations would focus on social media algorithms choosing what people get to see.

From the report linked in the OP: “Documenting the information does not validate it, establish its credibility, or weigh it against other information verified by the FBI,” the spokesperson said in a statement, cautioning that providing such information could harm investigations and judicial proceedings and “unfairly violate privacy or reputations.”

They’re getting crushed by a report that has zero evidence of any criminality on their part. Too funny.

While something of a fixation for you, rather off topic too, don’t you think?

Space force is a funded defense organization, and being ‘space’ related is reliant on high cost hardware and systems. The WH initiative on AI will consist of legislative review and formulation of regulations. The budgets of each reflect their differing objectives and means.

As has been explained numerous times, a financial record linking a payment is not in and of itself evidence of crime. Comey looked, and he could find any evidence of crimes.

Nonsense. Market regulation is a primary function of EU governance, it’s how the ‘EU free trade area functions’ within EU wide common regulations. I can think of numerous examples of the EU controlling what is ‘let loose on EU citizens’. The exclusion of toxins from foods, untested and unsafe medicines, untested and unsafe electrical goods, untested and unsafe motor vehicles… the list goes on.

Living within one means is a lot easier when there are no idiots enacting dogmatic economic lunacy that directly causes a massive increase in mortgage interest payments. All Truss had to do was nothing. The electorate have noticed she couldn’t even do that. And why wouldn’t the electorate notice, millions are now paying significantly higher mortgage interest rates.

Maybe the EU doesn’t want to let AI controlled by corporation loose on EU citizens or give corporations free reign to do whatever they please no matter the consequences.

“The report itself does not substantiate these claims or implicate Mr Biden. It does not allege illegal conduct.” Next!

It’s a direct consequence of selecting a lying fraudster as a candidate.