Chomper Higgot

There’s that bile of yours again Jonny.

Andrew is said to be a boy of a thicko. Paying for trolls to attack Giuffre when the service is obvious freely available suggests his intellectual failings might have been underestimated.

Even for you Jonny that’s a rather bizarre allegation. Nothing at all in the statement “But then Spurs fans aren’t violently assaulting people and chanting abusive remarks regarding the slaughter of children in Gaza.” besmirches anyone, Jewish or otherwise.

Maccabi Tel Aviv ‘fans’, links provided above.

Explain how this has got anything to do with ‘the left’?

The corporate policy of ‘en<deleted>ification’ in search of profits over quality. Green & Blacks is on the same trajectory.

Imagine doffing your hat and tugging your forelock’s to that piece of over privileged scum.

As a life long Tottenham supporter I’m not worried that this ‘pro-Islam local authority’ is going to ban Spurs fans. But then Spurs fans aren’t violently assaulting people and chanting abusive remarks regarding the slaughter of children in Gaza. ‘Defend the indefensible’ you say. Yeh, righty-o.

Erm… no.

Seems you didn’t get the correction:

Sorry Nick, not my video. Not an ‘error’ of reporting the video, misreporting that was not corrected when brought to the attention of multiple news channels. Peaceful protest is a right, thuggery is not. Hence the ban.

I would not be in the least bit surprised to learn the most, if not all, of those presenting themselves as Maccabi Tel Aviv ‘fans’ while engaging in overtly offensive chants and violent attacks where neither Israeli nor Jewish. Football has a long history of violent gangs and individuals who’s only interest in the sport is to have an excuse for thuggery. You’ve listed examples, there are others.

They were not targeted in Amsterdam. I’ve provided the fact check. Away with you and your blatant faksehood.

Yeh right.

I’ve made no claim that the Maccabi fans are Jewish, though if they are not that would scupper the howls of this ban being ‘antisemitic’. The DW fact check I linked relates to misrepresentation of an attack by Maccabi Tel Aviv fans on others as an antisemitic attack on the same Maccabi Tel Aviv fans. It appears you’ve not been able to grasp that fact. Clearly Maccabi Tel Aviv fans, if they are indeed ‘fans’ are not the first people to be banned from football games. Banning violent thugs from football games has a long history, there is no ‘precedent’ here, dangerous or otherwise.

There’s nothing funny about mocking the victims of genocide.

Now all you need to do is prove the committee acted on Ayoub Khan’s or Mothin Ali’s instructions.

Yawn.

I’m sure there might have been Nick. But the evidence presented as an antisemitic attack was of Maccabi Tel Aviv Fans kicking seven shades out of others. A disgraceful and inflammatory misrepresentation of actual events.

I never suggested the ‘Maccabi Tel Aviv Fans’ engaged in violent attacks were Israelis or for that matter Jewish. It’s not a ‘dangerous’ precedent, it’s not even a precedent: Galatasaray S.K. (Turkey) fans https://www.theguardian.com/football/2000/apr/15/newsstory.galatasaray

No it doesn’t show that one video was incorrectly labeled. It demonstrates a completely false narrative being adopted by numerous major news organizations, portraying acts of violence by Maccabi Tel Aviv Fans as ‘antisemitic attacks’ on the self same Maccabi Tel Aviv Fans. A polar opposite representation of the actual facts and that despite direct challenges to the false representation of the attacks by the person who provided the video footage.

Act of war already. Nick, I’ve told you a million times not to exaggerate. Make that 1,000,001.

And with facts too.

Your attempt at the ‘Antisemitism slur’ is strong (as in stinks). If you wish to dispute any of the facts of post please have a go at doing so.

But it didn’t and they were not.