EVENKEEL

5 hours ago, bermondburi said:

You don't drink that schite do you? 

Biggest problem in Isaan. 

A few times, the above batch is mixed with special leaves with medicinal secrets. I drank with my lady's step dad once for my first time. Man, it doesn't take much to make me hit the bed.

13 hours ago, sirineou said:

I have a screenplay for a movie, It is a comedy.

Man driving by sees some men attempting to rob a bank. He calls the police.

Robbers hear the police coming run away, but are eventually caught and there is a trial.  

-Bank guard says "yep that's them I saw them"

-Robbers turn on each other and start spilling the beans.

-Plenty of evidence.

-Robbers say"when we heard the cops coming,we dropped or weapon" and we did not robbed the bank" 

-Robbers say "we were following orders, from where we cant say"

-Crime boss says, "I didn't tell them to go rob a bank for me, I told them to point guns at the tellers and ask for money" ????

-Mob boss and robbers say "fake trial, bring in the man who turned as in, we just want to hear what he says, we promise we will not hurt him, really we promise"

-Some idiots in the audience cheer "fake trial, fake trial" !!!

What do you all think, does this movie have legas, Any suggestions for actors to play the parts?

 

 

You're getting full of yourself.....

Raised my kid the Isaan way, or maybe it's the Thai way, no car seat. His mother held the baby till she was old enough to crawl around the truck.

Better warn brother Sakoo about this.

4 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Almost everything the whistleblower reported has been confirmed by others. What more by others who can offer first hand testimony. As i recall, the major complaint against the whistleblower was that a lot of what he reported was second hand or hearsay. So why would his testimony be necessary now? Even if he were a rabid partisan of the Democratic Party, what difference would that make?

The FBI might have a different opinion.

I'll take Pete over warren or Bernie that's for certain. He's a smart guy, or he sounds smart. In all seriousness, what would his husband's title be in the White House?

If Pete has a husband, as president would he be called Mr. President or Madame President?

40 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

Straight out of the Big Book of GOP Deflections (Impeachment Addition). 
Would you also like the Bidens to appear? Or perhaps Elvis? I mean if you’re going for the “list of people that don’t matter to this investigation” why stop at the living. 

So, the whistleblower has no part in this according to you, unbelievable.

Please excuse the title. If Major Pete wins the presidency will his husband be a "first man" ? I just saw them at the Debate, they pointed out Pete's partner as Pete's husband. 

I'm confused, how does this work? Maybe the gay TV members could educate me.

Sondland is testifying in todays hearing, stay tuned. I'm in Callie at the moment taking a class, I'll catch the reruns.

I personally want to praise Sakoo for a funny troll thread. The question shouldn't be what his country of origin is but, rather which long time TV member has a dual personality. Which TV member has a good BS way with words? 

8 hours ago, xylophone said:

Well you got that bit right anyway!!!

If you can't play fair, don't play.

3 hours ago, sakoo said:

Hold your horses there partner, it's not a plan yet, I have months yet to fine tune the specifics, i will fly into Samui from KL with Air Asia, or Surat Thani, and the take the boat to Thong Sala. Are you an expert on Thong Sala? 

I wasn't aware AA flew into Samui, thought only Bangkok Air. 

17 minutes ago, J Town said:

 And yes I did hear Volker/Morrison testify. They said they never heard the actual words "quid pro quo" but it was fully understood that was what was happening.

It was understood by who, Volker and Morrison stated no "quid pro quo", nothing related to bribery. Their statements aren't hearsay, there was "no demand" for anything.

"But it was fully understood isn't evidence. 

3 minutes ago, Skallywag said:

Not sure what you consider "nothing".  It is clear what POTUS did was "improper", the only question is,  is it an impeachable offence.  POTUS withheld military aid and a meeting with the President of Ukraine while Giuliani pressured the Ukraine for information on the Bidens.  

Vindman described how the "power disparity" between the U.S. and Ukraine made Trump's request for a "favor" more like a demand.......

president's request for investigations to be a "demand" that was "improper."

Giuliani tells the New York Times he plans to travel to Kiev and meet with President-elect Zelensky to urge him to investigate the Bidens.... https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/us/politics/giuliani-ukraine-trump.html

The news ignites a firestorm of bipartisan condemnation that Giuliani is improperly seeking the help of a foreign government to benefit Trump’s re-election campaign.

 

No aid was withheld, Ukraine wasn't aware of aid being withheld.

Vindman is giving his "opinion" that's all it is or ever will be. Did you hear Volker and Morrison testify there was no bribery.

10 hours ago, Tug said:

Ahhhh you do realize your Donald operates on smears and lies don’t you?to me the trump supporters sound more desperate every day don’t be a mark this isent about the dems or republicans it’s about right and wrong and the constitution Donald Trump has shown time and time again he is incapable of working within the confines of the constitution or law for that matter he is unfit he needs to be removed ASAP imo and coddled untle that time

Watched a lot of Wednesday's Impeachment hearing, and I must say I'm confident this is another "nothing" burger, with all the nothing trimmings. There is no way a reasonable person can believe Mr. Trump said anything in the phone call that could justify impeachment.

Ambassador Volker and Mr. Morrison did an outstanding job answering the leading questions from the dems. And I'm sure the American people will see through this disgraceful scam. Any hopes the dems had of swaying the opinion of voters come 2020 are flying out the window. 

42 minutes ago, Tagged said:

So, where about did you find this paradise? 

I wouldn't call Rayong area paradise, But I like it.

6 hours ago, SniperSpider said:

I drive on highway 211 North, according to the sign, from Nong Khai while staying in Thailand all the way home. It's a little twisty here and there yet follows the Mekong on the Thailand side of the river. I never cross over the river to Laos. It's definitely not south, unless I'm going to Nong Khai, and definitely not Laos. Try staying on topic and not deflecting.  We have mapaholics now on the forum? Show me where I stated true north or as the eagle flies.  Besides, I wasn't quoting to you.

Public Forum......And, I was thinking the exact same thing when you wrote north of Nong Khai.