Jump to content

Caldera

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    6,290
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Caldera

  1. 4 hours ago, elviajero said:

    It’s a ‘Tourist Visa’, and was aimed at the Asian market to make it easier for them to come and go.

    Rather than blaming Westerners for maxing out their METV, you should blame the Thai authorities for poorly designing it this way.

     

    I agree that it was aimed at the Asian market, I read the news back then as well. Fit for its intended purpose, they should have designed it as a VOA replacement: Validity 6 months, multiple entries, get stamped in for 15 days (!) upon arrival. Not 60 days, no 30 day extension - try to "live in Thailand" on that!

     

    For Westerners, they could (or could not) have left the existing double entry tourist visa in place. They effectively replaced it with the METV - at a higher price and with additional requirements. I don't think it's surprising that certain Westerners "misunderstood" that.

  2. 21 minutes ago, simon43 said:

    I never said that I have PR in Laos - I said that I can apply for PR after 5 years of residing in the country.

    Thanks for clarifying. What you wrote in post #8 sounded like you have obtained PR for both Myanmar and Laos already:

     

    "When living in Laos and Myanmar over the past few years, I never had to do TM30s, never had to do 90 day reports etc.  I knew exactly where I was in terms of my visa.  I was able to obtain permanent residence after 3 years (Myanmar) and after 5 years (Laos - down from 10 years because I'm a Scientist -special provision).  For both countries, the PR fee was low and no need to marry a local."

     

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...