Bday Prang

Just now, baansgr said:

Best thing, fantastic..might be able to venture out safely at last..bye bye potheads, dopeheads..go somewhere else and smoke your rubbish.. yippee 

somebody like you would probably have trouble venturing out safely anywhere with an attitude like that. I suggest you take your mum with you.  Anyway don't get too excited 11th of november is a long way off and tomorrow never comes. Its  not going to happen

4 minutes ago, DezLez said:

I assume you refuse to apologise for your all-embracing unfounded accusation against school teachers!

when you apologise for your unfounded  insult to users of cannabis  "disgusting and obnoxious"

Actually schoolteachers spend their entire working lives getting upset about the behaviour of others its only to be expected for them to have trouble stopping so hardly an unfounded accusation

27 minutes ago, AustinRacing said:

Fair comment. The issue is they’ll find ways to circumvent to stay in business whereas pharmacies businesses arenot dependent on it. In some cases such codeine only hospital pharmacies stock it. 

Realistically only the most "genuine" of medical users will be obtaining their cannabis from a pharmacy.unless its cheap and of exceptional quality The rest of us recreational miscreants will revert to type and carry on like we did before 

49 minutes ago, Bert got kinky said:

 

You forgot to mention how spiteful these idiots are.

Fancy getting bent out of shape just because people are enjoying themselves.

 

 

There has always been a subset of people who like to get upset about the behaviour of others, retired school teacher types normally,  They would be more comfortable in somewhere like Dubai or Singapore 

Just now, cjinchiangrai said:

It is a stupid click baiting question from a nonsmoker.

probably an ex smoker, they are the worst

1 minute ago, madone said:

oh, ok then.

So what did you read this morning? 

he's probably spent all morning searching the web for an example, that's what his sort do

2 minutes ago, Hummin said:

 

These parties used to be absent from these beaches and islands

full moon beach parties have been around for decades, what are you talking about

39 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Just a wild guess but I would say smokers on a layover that have not had a cigarette for hours. Why is it any of your business?

It is none of his or anybody else's business,  

44 minutes ago, proton said:

why not try bum guns, sinsot or 7/11 products? you might get more attention for you fake click bait

well said

11 minutes ago, AustinRacing said:

The control measure of allowing shops to sell with prescription and doctor inspecting monthly or be on site will not work. The only way would be if pharmacies dispense it following a phone call to the doctors office. 

why should they need any more than a prescription? that is all that is required for other drugs, many if not all of which are more harmful

5 minutes ago, Andrew65 said:

It would seem that many non-users don't like the smell of it wafting around public places. It's a 'pungent' and not very pleasant smell.

(I'm not virulently anti-drugs, I've had a smoke a few times before, partly out of curiosity, quite pleasant).

It would actually appear that a few very vocal anti cannabis stalwarts still driven by ancient anti cannabis propaganda just cannot stop whinging .  Some of them even claiming to take offence on behalf of imaginary ultra conservative families for fear of appearing pathetic 

2 minutes ago, atpeace said:

I do find many of the anti weed posters have interesting perspectives but the pompous fools that are insulting bore me. 

 

Smoking at home or ,when in public, in areas that don't offend others would have probably eliminated the risk of it being banned.  For whatever reason the smell and the act of smoking is upsetting to many.  Too bad we can't rewind the legalization and implement strict restrictions on where it could be smoked and sold.

The fact is there are restrictions, as far as I remember, causing a nuisance by smoking in public could be punished by a  fine of up to 20,000 baht.  I have not heard of this happening so one can only conclude that few if any members of the public have been outraged enough to complain, or when they have the police have not acted. 

my money is on option one as most of the complainers seem to prefer to spend their time on here trolllng

4 minutes ago, Bert got kinky said:

 

So, you have not posted anything of substance on this thread, you winged like a pussy and now you think that you are a winner.

Jog on, you are boring me.

 

 

 

 

 

It has always intrigued me as to why the staunch anti cannabis brigade spend so much time on cannabis based threads.  Trolling and generally insulting others is strange behaviour from people trying to or claiming to occupy the moral high ground.

The really amazing thing is that their aversion to cannabis is based on 100 year old propaganda from the USA 

25 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Again, stupidity do not have limits, and you do not even know yourself do you? Getting annoyed by common sense. 

 

😁✊️👏👏👏👏👏

 

I guve you teaspoons of information if that helps. Public do care, thats why this is news, and new regulations and better regulations needed for everyones best. 

 

You know when there need to be put up signs to ask their customers not to smokey their joints in public in one of the busiest streets in Bangkok

The vast majority of the public do not care, you are confusing the whinging of a tiny but very vocal  minority with the views of the silent majority who are not inclined to comment at all.

 As for putting up signs, there is nothing new about no smoking signs and I guarantee the restaurant has similar signs politely asking cigarette smokers not to smoke too so I can't see the point of the photo at all

People smoking cigarettes in "non smoking" areas are generally subject to a fine of up to 5000 baht. I see no reason why somebody smoking a joint should be subject to a more severe penalty 

1 hour ago, paul1804 said:

I hope common sense prevails and cannabis gets to be a controlled substance so you cannot legally walk down the street smoking it!!

It does not need to be a controlled substance in order to stop public usage.    just a simple rule forbidding public use, end of problem.  Now what were you saying about common sense?

45 minutes ago, Jake44 said:

 

Not to me.  I think cannabis smells 1000x worse.  Some of us must smell it differently than others.

some certainly seem to whinge more than most

1 hour ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Not just one group or one study making the findings that immigrants, undocumented or not, are less likely to be involved in crime.

There is always some sort of "study" or "research" that allegedly backs up the leftists usual claims. Who ever it  is it that commissions these endless and pointless surveys would probably have a major influence on  the results.

The fact is most people are just sick and tired of it all, and would rather they were all rounded up and sent home, that is afterall what immigration rules are for 

What do they mean exactly by "insured"   What insurance are they referring to for Thais, and as for foreigners , why would they need to be insured ? could they not just pay up from their own funds?

28 minutes ago, candide said:

It's about importing young people in order to compensate for the low birth rate, and thus balance the age pyramid.

https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/esp/spain/birth-rate

 

Having said that, it's not without problems as the successive governments did not manage immigration and it's consequences.

strange to see a low birth rate in a catholic country.