Bday Prang

4 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

Not sure about England, but in the U.S. it would be unconstitutional as Sharia violates many of our basic rights.

Well in the UK our pathetic and incompetent Prime minister appears to be trying to revise the justice system to remove the human rights of the indigenous population.  Wouldn't do it to the muzzers though

2 hours ago, simple1 said:

Blue cloth with a circle of eight stars, two wide red stripes and one wide white stripe. The Confederate States of America's first national flag was known as the “Stars & Bars.” This flag flew from 1861 to 1863. Each of the eight stars represented a Confederate state in March 1861 when the flag was adopted.

 

https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/object/nmah_461713#:~:text=Blue cloth with a circle,and one wide white stripe.&text=The Confederate States of America's,when the flag was adopted.

 

Sharia Law will not be enacted as a parallel legal system in the USA unless supported by Congress and the President

          Well I don't want to worry you but once you end up with a muslim president the odds of that happening are drastically shortened.   If you think it will never happen you are sadly mistaken. 

          The fundamental philosophy of islam is to conquer the world by ridding it of all other religions you only have to look at @proton's list to see the hatred they have for non muslims. 

          They will achieve this, eventually, not necessarily  by acts of violence, although we can expect plenty of that, but simply by out breeding the indigenous people of the country they have invaded. 

           They soon become politically active and once the selection of a  muslim candidate is available do you seriously think any muslims would vote for anybody else? Of course not, and to make matters worse voter apathy leading to poor turnout from locals means that the muslims don't actually need a true majority they just need "enough" 

            If you are not convinced Look at the Lord mayor of London Sadiq Khan currently enjoying his 3rd or 4th time as mayor?  who do you think voted for him ?  and I believe there are around 5 other major cities in the UK with a muslim mayor and I can guarantee these are places overrun with muslim immigrants.  Ok the Uk is a lot smaller than the US but the only difference with that is the timescale.

             So its inevitable that eventually , one of these savages, with the assistance of some useful non muslim lefty  idiots, will attain the position of President or Prime minister  it might not be in our lifetime, but its coming and once that happens  god help us all

1 minute ago, connda said:

Some of the most vehement anti-marijuana types I've met in my life were borderline alcoholic many of whom smoked cigarettes.

 

yep that mirrors my experience too

1 hour ago, Aussie999 said:

For those who say cannabis does not lead to violence... Time to update your out of date info.

No good down voting me...just try, if you can, to counter the article I linked to, your personal opinions do not count.

 

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.746287/full

 Are you trying to tell us that you have actually read everything  in that link.  ?  you have serious issues 

6 minutes ago, StandardIssue said:

I wonder if they will be able to even organize any kind of protest.

 

Potential protestor:

  Dude, this is too much work. Wow man. Why don't we get together with all those Goverment big shots and smoke a bowl. Everyone will mellow out and understand just how great weed is. Don't they know if everyone smoked weed the world would be a better place?

I believe there is a demo in Bangkok on 7th of july 

i find your pathetic attempt at trying to emulate a potential  pot smoker rather insulting, it also proves your complete lack of knowledge, Another one who should just go away

2 minutes ago, connda said:

Any violence I've seen in people who are smoking pot was with those we were also heavily drinking.  

maybe a small minority   those who mix drink and weed can get violent but not in the way he means , a its usually violently sick,  Ain't nobody causing trouble when they are suffering the dreaded "whitey" natures way of controlling things, and very effective it is too.  I wonder if whiteys were mentioned at all anywhere in his "peer reviewed , " agenda driven"   and totally  biased anti cannabis research, I doubt he even knows what a whitey is

1 minute ago, connda said:

 

 

 

 

I love you Reefer Madness types spewing anti-marijuana propaganda about something you have a negative preconceived notion about.

I smoked pot a lot, and I mean a lot, back in high school and college.  I never bought it.  It was just available in the social crowds I ran in.  I've met one person in my life who actually believed they had a cannabis addiction.  Everyone else I know could take it or leave it.  When I left college, my free supply of cannabis was no longer around so my intake decreased to a few times a year.

Cannabis isn't addictive.  Cigarettes are addictive.  Highly addictive.  I quit smoking cigarettes in my 20s because it simply was counter to my athleticism. It was one of the most difficult things I ever did.  I used pot to get through the worst of it.  Then eventually as I got older, I simply stopped using cannabis for no other reason than most of the people I then hung out with weren't pot smokers.  In my opinion, cigarettes should be banned.  They are addictive and they kill.  Cannabis?  "Pfft!"

So keep up the propaganda. Kick back and enjoy your whisky, tobacco, and your anti-cannabis rants.
  "Cannabis is addictive and is the scourge of youth!  Arrrggghhh."  
  No - it's not.

well said sir, I cant understand the mind set of these people,  Trying to dictate what other can and can't do 

27 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

For those who say cannabis does not lead to violence... Time to update your out of date info.

No good down voting me...just try, if you can, to counter the article I linked to, your personal opinions do not count.

 

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.746287/full

Everybody is different and drugs can affect people in different ways, maybe some people do become violent after using weed.   Pales into insignificance compared to alcohol linked violence though 

I have never been violent as a result of weed and I don't know of anybody who has,there is nearly always alcohol involved but that does not suit the narrative so it does not get a mention

Causing violence is the most pathetic contrived excuse for banning weed,  you must be getting desperate, go chill out with a few beers and some nice scotch, you'll feel better when you have slapped the mrs

30 minutes ago, Aussie999 said:

I suggest you actually do some more modern research on the affects of cannabis good and BAD .. then you will understand there why your comment is wrong.

I do plenty of research every day , the practical sort, I have been doing it for 40 years, So I have first hand practical experience.   you on the other hand prefer to believe the contrived and twisted results of "research" commissioned and funded by those with an agenda. You have no practical first hand experience to draw on so basically you don't have a clue what you are talking about. better if you stop posting its becoming embarrassing.   If you don't want to smoke it fine, nobody is suggesting you should, but you need to stop interfering in the choices other grown adults  have made.  

4 hours ago, blaze master said:

Make love to as many bar girls as I could. 

"make love" !?   

On 6/25/2025 at 8:39 AM, tonypattaya said:

Why jump from one extreme to another. Some people wish to use it as a recreational drug, just as they do with cigarettes. Banning the substance is not the answer; it will only create pushers, jail more users, waste police time.

Why not make it less available:
1. restrict the number of outlets (say 2 in Pattaya, 4 in Bangkok, etc) by charging a huge licence fee, to the highest bidders. 2. charge a very high duty on the sale of the product.

Like cigarettes the product should not be flaunted to the sight if non-users and children.

whats with all this faux concern  about "the children"     All these vulnerable children in pattaya will see people drinking alcohol every day , do the poor souls not require shielding from that ? if not why not?

go on say it ,,, "its drugs innit"

23 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

Thanks. My concern would be if you get an insomnia prescription at a shop, then you are an identifiable customer. If they want to check your house, then can then do so.

highly unlikely, they would have to come in the night and catch you sleeping, get a dog the barking will wake you up.

On 6/26/2025 at 8:11 PM, blaze master said:

All batches of flower will need to pass testing. Heavy metals bacteria pesticides etc 

if only they applied that to food stuffs like fruit and veg

Just now, Baht Simpson said:

Your obsession with toilets and bums is alarming but perhaps not totally out of character. Nice to see how you can raise the standard of debate. 

When it comes to all that diversity rubbish the debate is already at gutter level, further more its days are numbered as evidenced in the OP

Just now, Baht Simpson said:

You quoted my serious point and started on about grafitti in public toilets. I'd say that's the essense of child like responses, wouldn't you. Why not post something intelligent rather than a little dig? It rather confirms my other point about being unable to talk sensibly to some people here. 

So am I wrong, is there no useful information on toilet walls,    I may be wrong but something like 

"phone this number to get bummed" is surely of interest to some 

6 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Me too!

280bht ........... Oh the expense!

Reassuringly expensive as the StelIa Artois advert used to say      I  seem to be spending as much on rolling papers as I do on weed !  Never really liked bongs, 

Anyway I now have 6 different strains to evaluate before my next purchase so I'd better get to it. Its hard work but it has to be done lol 

32 minutes ago, Jeff the Chef said:

 

Nail firmly hit on head, the big players will have flexed a bit of muscle with the politicians, big upside for them is maybe a few independent outlets will fold forcing prices up.

Maybe we will end up with just  a few government approved strains, anybody fancy "chang weed" , "leo weed" or "singa weed ? thought not. Anyway unlike the alcoholics I doubt pot heads will settle for that depressing scenario

10 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

You'd need to date your publication, as the rules are being changed almost every day.

Shops to all close published on 26th June ..... Shops close

Sales as normal published on 27th June .... Shops reopen

 

Flip, flop ........ You gotta laugh at Thailand!

I think i got my info from the same supplier as you (fis 420) they sent out a couple of notifications but I didn't see anything about closing on the 26th. Anyway it can't have worried them too much, as I panic bought 100g off them on the 26th and have just taken delivery. 

9 minutes ago, Hummin said:

What now? Still dismissing or disagreeing existing pharmacies could be replacing the existing dispensaries? After all pharmacies who handle classified drugs needs a dr or similar required present as the proposal as I said in my previous post you disagreed with

Licensed premises will be required to have medical professionals, such as doctors or pharmacists, on-site. Additionally, retailers need approval from local administrative bodies due to public nuisance concerns related to the strong smell of cannabis
 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1365076-thailand-delays-some-requirements-of-new-cannabis-rules/

 

 

You are dreaming   Mark my words pharmacies will not be selling weed, and   weed shops will not be employing doctors (for gods sake what for).   Furthermore pharmacies are not and have never been required to have a doctor on the premises.

You can't have been here long , you have no idea how things work,  approval from "local administrative bodies"  

2 minutes ago, lordgrinz said:

 

If that's why you left and came here, the problem might be you, not the place you left. I prefer to have all these laws, rules, regulations, and enforcement so that we are all on the same page. I see you prefer chaos, to each their own, but don't come crying when you become a victim of your own delusions.

Indeed the "problem" may well have been with me  but it didn't follow me here

So why did you choose to leave your civilised over regulated country  to come here if you prefer strict rules and regulations ? what a strange choice.

Was it lack of research?, or did you just expect Thailand to change to suit you? I think you may be disappointed