Bday Prang

How many regular church goers do you know ?

You obviously have no knowledge of UK law , Its probably best if you keep quiet

I assume you are referring to the practising variety ( tiny minority) , The vast majority of people classed as christians have had no interest in their religion at all for a long time.

nice one

good point, and I am also wary of people who for some reason are always a bit to quick to identify as victims or those supporting them

I've already put you right regarding one inaccurate criticism, do I really have to do it again? you must be feeling embarrassed about your last attempt

Well the wont be watching 'allo 'allo its been banned by the wokies as have several episodes of other classic british comedies, A controversial comedian has been banned from performing ( to adults) in a large city in the UK as the "woke" mayor doesn't like his subject content and has decided others should not be allowed to see him perform, WE dont control the off button thats now the purpose of the close ally of the woke their main enforcer "cancel culture" A strange spin off from that was the famous author JK rowling who was cancelled by the ungrateful little brats that she made famous. basically for daring to state the medical definition of "woman"

They don't actually need any facts, In the uk for example you only have to "perceive" that you were the victim of a "hate crime" to be considered as such. A law for snowlakes written by snowflakes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinner_for_One read it and weep then you can congratulate me on what was actually a very objective comment and will now hopefully have been explained to you by the clever wiki people It may well be part of Norway's Christmas but its a British part But one thing all us Brits will agree on even those who haven't seen it is,...It will sound a hell of a lot funnier when dubbed into Norwegian hahahaha

I think the word woke was originally used by native english speakers to mean "not asleep" as far as I am aware It may well have been hijacked by others, that is not uncommon, It has now been reclaimed, and is used sarcastically by the dissatisfied and not very vocal majority who are getting more and more fed up with the very vocal "woke" minority Killing not really a consideration ? its the armed forces not social services. Unless I am mistaken the generally accepted way of attacking of defending militarily is by killing people, , ideally the opposing forces soldiers, but if civilians get in the way then so be it.

It was written by a british guy Lauri Wylie and starred a british guy Freddie Frinton It was written for the theatre but some german guy saw it in blackpool and the rest is history I had never heard of it until some germans told me about it. It was never shown on TV in the UK but now it is shown every year on sky at xmas according to wiki. Why they show it I don't know as its awful. Maybe the UK leftie media are worried that German expats are entitled to view it as part of their human right to a traditional German xmas

Well I mentioned him first and I can assure you I have never read the Spectator I am frantically wracking my brain trying to imagine why anybody would want to post some thing like that If you are trying to defend a so called "expert" and the best you can come up with is that his predictions were less wrong than the predictions made by a "covid denier" in the early days of covid then you will need to try a bit harder. Its almost as if Neil Ferguson posted that himself, Its exactly the response I would have expected from him. That's uncanny unless......

Some couples also come for "nightlife" never heard of swingers??

Sorry I hadn't considered the possibility that your previous extension was due to expire on 20 / sept

Indeed there is . A short British black and white "comedy" entitled "dinner for one" was a total failure in the UK but is considered essential viewing in Germany every christmas

I think they would have said by now, but there again you never know what they will do next

That seems very generous, certainly more than 60 days!

And its not unique to Thailand, The Uk had several profits of doom One (Neill Fergusson) was caught breaking lock down rules in order to visit his mistress in the early days of covid . another ( may even have been the same guy) had a history of disproved doom and gloom predictions stretching back over 20 years involving everything from Foot and Mouth to SARS. The rest of them were no better. Strangely they all received knighthoods in gratitude for the parts they played in helping to terrify the nation

Isn't it a bit strange that such Woke people would even consider working for an Organisation like the Royal Thai Airforce whose primary function , when called upon, is to kill people . Especially considering the role of this team seems to be to assist them in maintaining their killing machines, If the Thais declared war on a "big nosed" nation would you consider sabotaging their weapons systems? Thought not

A very miserable team by the sound of it where fraternising with the opposite sex is frowned upon, and anti german sentiment is rife,

If the "victim" had been Scandinavian and the comment had been in regard to blonde hair or yodelling nobody, you included, would have raised an eyebrow, likewise if the "victim " had been English and the comment had been about poor foreign language skills, warm beer,footbal hooliganism, cr@p food or drunken behaviour whilst on holiday again nothing would be said, you included. One of the fundamental principles of "Woke-ism is that certain nationalities and minorities are considered fair game, and can or perhaps should, have as much vitriol and hate directed at them as possible and with impunity , whilst others are protected, and eggshells need to be walked on when considering making any comments either negative or indeed positive regarding them. The comments on this thread about Germans,..... Nazi's , no sense of humour, towels on sunbeds, socks and sandals etc etc are proof of this. Negative comments regarding white people, cannabis users and people who pay for sex, for example, are also tolerated, even encouraged with nobody taking offence on behalf of these as yet unfashionable "victims" It is actually rather amusing watching the wokies on the BBC almost squirming with discomfort when they have to report about the Asian grooming gangs in the UK , a subject that was covered up for years by "Woke" social workers for fear of offending racial sensitivities, at the expense of the welfare of vulnerable white underage girls Reports of female genital mutilation are always discussed "awkwardly" and kept to a minimum for the same reason The fact that it is carried out by women being another unfortunate truth. Yet a white hetro prime minister gets accused of attending a party and the Woke media frenzy is deafening , Headline news every day, for months on end Your comments regarding his "inappropriate" behaviour towards females is also somewhat curious, there is no reason for you to get "triggered" unless you received complaints from any of these women, which you obviously didn't ,as you would have mentioned the fact.. Flirting between the sexes is a normal part of human behaviour, even at work , and generally enjoyed by both parties involved, most men know where to draw the line , and most women have no problem in dealing with the ones that don't, its almost sexist to say otherwise. Abuse of power in these situations involving persistent unwelcome sexual attention from a superior is obviously another matter. But a bit if flirting , get over your self, and its none of your business whether he's married or not You need to also bear in mind that more relationships are formed between people who met at work than in any other situation, do you personally wish to put an end to this? why? Likewise If the guy with the big nose had complained to you himself, officially, then maybe some action was warranted , perhaps a quiet word would have sufficed in the first instance, however "big nose" did not complain did he? in fact it appears he didn't want any action to be taken Yet fuelled by the righteous indignation of a few on here. you saw fit to steam in with an official reprimand, was this an example of an appropriate response,? I don't think so, Was it another attempt at raising your woke profile ? definitely your final question "what do you guy's think ? I actually think the whole story is made up, for the sole purpose of giving you an opportunity to virtue signal to the woke warriors and to hopefully get a you a pat on the back. The underlying message is also that you don't think having a big nose is a positive attribute and illogically refuse to accept that it is a common feature for some races, With out doubt you are taking offence on behalf of others , possibly as a way of excising your own feelings of guilt..Not unlike the people who bang on the back of police vans taking pedophiles to court.

He didn't you are quite right , but i'd made the connection the minute I heard the words "viral craze" and three fingers I didn't need Asean now to spell it out. Of course I may be wrong, but I think the guy was instructed not to mention any words like "dissent " or "protest" This has been seen as something with the potential to develop and they want to nip it in the bud , Doing so under the guise of health and safety is, in my opinion, a sad attempt to hide what is effectively removing peoples right of protest.. Are you not a little surprised the general has issued such a statement expressing "his safety concerns" for a few minor miscreants and highlighting the dangers of "losing control whilst sounding ones horn " yet wasn't that moved to take the opportunity to spell out a few other more common dangers on the roads, and his promise to come down as firmly on drunk drivers and on other such people and practices who endanger the lives of other people every day was notable by its absence too Can't blame em really I think they'd really rather not have to get the tanks out

I don't think its quite like that, The police are not particularly enamoured with Prayuth and his military administration. The "senior officer" making this announcement is only carrying out instructions issued from a higher authority. Lets be honest the only people they will catch are the ones stupid enough to do it in the vicinity of a police station or check point. He's just paying lip service to his superiors and ensuring that a perceived dissent is at least seen to be outlawed

15% - 75% who gets how much? how is this to be apportioned out

one shouldn't put 100% faith in any doctor, that's why we have second opinions, lol I see that's what they have tried to do in the OP