Jump to content

Bday Prang

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    5,457
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bday Prang

  1. It will be available to the public , just restricted to those who are sick, The opioid apocalypse is a different matter and is no excuse for denying these substances to those who need them.
  2. it was a full moon on the 23rd some of them are still out and about obviously
  3. what particular mess are you talking about ? No prescription req'd and not available to those under 21 or pregnant, lactating women seems like common sense to me regarding cannabis. Which part do you have a problem with?
  4. They are talking about prescription drugs, traditionally used to provide medical treatment to people suffering, Not really anything to do with "money and more money" unless one owns a pharmaceutical company
  5. It will probably take the form of what's generally called a "prescription " unlikely to be raw opium, more than likely a product derived from it, You know just like almost everywhere else
  6. I'm not so sure that's strictly correct, Around 10 years ago I suffered kidney stones. the pain was intense, the first thing they did on my arrival at hospital after checking my blood pressure and taking my temperature was to give me an injection for the pain. Not sure what it was but it certainly worked and as a bonus left me feeling high as a kite, Maybe the fact that it was a private hospital had something to do with it, not sure what a government hospital would do
  7. No it wasn't ! What on earth are you talking about. Try reading the article, specifically the bit where it says...." Opium and psilocybin mushrooms, known for their hallucinogenic effects, are now classified as Category 5 narcotics, differentiating them from marijuana and hemp extracts." Cannabis was removed from the category 5 narcotics list, these two substances are now classified as such. it really isn't difficult to understand if you just read what's written and don't try to add your own personal take on things
  8. The correct response from you would have started with the words " thank you for the advice"
  9. that would explain why you sought Pseudoephedrine for a runny nose But be aware nasal sprays are not generally suitable for those under 3 years of age
  10. they are only approved for "medical treatment and research" it states that quite clearly in the OP or so I thought
  11. probably because that contentious issue has nothing to do with this thread,
  12. I think you will find there are still penalties for trafficking or supplying , why hot give it a go , open a shop and see what happens
  13. plenty of nasal sprays available that will clear a stuffy nose far better than Pseudoephedrine, Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride is the common active ingredient. Never heard of "vicks sinex" ?
  14. For somebody who's user name includes the word "Dr" you appear to have little idea, Should medical use be deemed appropriate for certain conditions the dispensaries are already well established, us mere lay people refer to them as "Pharmacies" or "Dispensing Chemists" You're not a real doctor,are you?
  15. what on earth are you talking about? I thought the article was perfectly clear , what part of "for medical treatment and research" do you not understand?
  16. The number of people who launch a tirade of protests after reading only the headlines is astonishing, Its almost as if they can't wait to complain
  17. dis you not understand the phrase "for medical use and research" you would be shocked if you knew haw many drugs a pharmacy sells, and as for a hospital omg
  18. Beware salespeople trying to sell you a larger unit than you need. Bigger is not better when it comes to air
  19. what bit don't you understand, I thought it was clear enough?
  20. Some parts of white culture, indeed , specifically your part Would you broach the subject of the daughters virginity with the parents, would you expect them to contribute towards the cost of the medical examination or would she have to pay for that herself.? Personally I think if you requested such a procedure any doctor would refuse point blank In the interests of saving face, i hope you have been saving money in earnest for a very long time as any dowry you might be asked to pay would be astronomical
  21. its taken these geniuses over a month to come up with this, and they still forgot to tell the target audience to make sure they wire it up to an electricity supply and don't forget to turn it on. Ahh "British" thermal units, doesn't it make you proud . That "goat " character won't be happy "
  22. " For me, marrying a virgin would be the preferable option" An imaginary fantasy culture that only exists in your warped mind, So you still have not answered the question, Would you expect a woman to undergo a medical examination to establish whether or not she was a virgin prior to marrying her? In my country surgical procedures are available to restore virginity, but are exclusively requested by muslims, to prevent the need for honour killings. You may just end up with a repair job, how would you feel about that. ? Would you be needing to establish her anal virginity too? that could be a bit more difficult Either way I wouldn't worry about the matter too much, from what I can see from your posts, you will remain eternally single, perhaps you might consider an inflatable sex doll , get your self a roll of cling film and it could be party time every night. and your sexual prowess will never be questioned ..again
  23. teach her what exactly? come on don't be shy, be specific and go into detail, I am genuinely very interested
  24. If you want respect for god you are asking the wrong guy, Although I can well imagine you requesting his assistance the next time you attempt to "form a woman" whatever that worrying phrase means.
×
×
  • Create New...