mikebike

Please, please, please - justify alcohol for me. As I said, if you can accept alcohol, there is no other drug you should reject.

I've used weed daily for almost 50 years. I like alcohol, and psychedelics as well. I do not understand the demonization of ANY drug. If you can accept the carnage of alcohol, you can, most certainly, accept any other drug. If you are not entirely clean - I AM referring to fun prescription drugs, caffeine, supplements, etc, then SHUT THE FLICK UP.

Support him emotionally, and get him help. Otherwise, cut him out of ANY funds until he has completed a program. It may not be the end of it, even at that. Addiction sucks.

You need to be more clear. From your post and response, it seems most folk, including me, thought you were referring to yourself.

No, we are suggesting they don't continue with performative non-governing farces which have no hope of passing the senate. A waste of everyone's time and money for ZERO actual change. How about passing new border laws?

Jesus Christ. Kids shooting kids and you cannot legislate ANY SOLUTION. Freaking feeble government. In fact is there a functioning government?

You'll get it right eventually. 😃

Uh, the freaking presidential election. I case you were unaware the Prez gets to name his own cabinet. Or are you worried the border scam isn't working, again?

Small village in the South. We have the absolute pleasure of having a very talented Thai/Italian chef. Of course I would. And do 😋

The Atto 3 is about the same size as a BMW X3. Nowhere near Mirage size.

🤣🤣🤣 How is something happening evey week still reported as "landmark". Anyway, it is a standard fraud case. He allegedly, illegally, used campaign funds and reported them as "legal fees", rather than what they were intended for. Landmark my behind. SOP for 45 for his entire life. If he had never run for Prez, he could have continued to to teflon... Now, not so much.

No one is asking for another prohibition. It doesn't work for alcohol, cannabis, or guns. That is well established, as you noted. But you, and many others, fail to take the next logical step - what did and does work? Surprise! When alcohol prohibition ended, laws and regulations were enacted to control the industry. Do you currently feel overly restricted in purchasing alcohol in the USA? Is there a logical reason the same solution won't work for guns?

Dig as deep as you want to confirm your bias. You won't find it on this forum or anywhere else. Why do you feel the need to be accusatory, immediately, without reason? Anyway, I'm a realist. The ICC can do very little to nothing to the actual perpetrators of the raid - they fled back to Gaza. Israel needs no help from the ICC in either tracking, or bringing to justice, the Hamas leaders. It is politically demonstrative and toothless, just as was South Africa's action.

The ICC has NO enforcement arm. They must rely on the cooperation of sovereign nations national police to enforce any warrant they issue. Hamas IS Gaza's government AND police force. Do you see the problem with your statement? Also very possible it was a typo by the poster you responded to. Why so agro?

Can ANYONE here list the high crimes and/or misdemeanors this guy committed? I am referring to actual crimes, not policy you do not like.

Nice spin, but polling had this race within the margin of error. The Dem won by 7. That is news, whether you like it or not.

🤣🤣 did you not understand, "updates this year will be dominated by AI—much of it from Google." 🤣🤣 What does your turning off WiFi do to stop AI apps running? Do you think Samsung doesn't use AI embedded in Apps?

And that's OK. We all gravitate towards those who speak to us. For me, I was done with Bill in the early oughts.

Being harsh because of your first paragraph. If he dors not want to get out of his bubble and experience what this great big world has to offer, I have no time for him.

Unfortunately Bill has not been relevant, or even relevant adjacent for decades.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/how-many-countries-has-the-us-invaded

I was replying to Jon and your jumping in had nothing to do with my response. R u OK?

No. But I can tell the difference between a narrative constructed for the gullible masses and a man hankering for a legacy.

You need to understand that access is not journalism. So far you haven't addressed your original point. Real journalist are not consumed by access, which was your point. Or are you gonna deflect again?

Why are you posting this reply to me? I agree on this point. Weird.