I don't care. Merely pointing out that the statement "Pattaya is thriving" despite its biggest tourism market, the Chinese, being absent, is a questionable statement.
In any case, once again, "thriving" compared to what / when?
I agree that zero baht tourists add very little, but there is a flow on effect in the form of employment, fresh produce, fuel, taxes etc etc that benefits the wider Pattaya / Thailand economy.
Yes, China blocks its citizens from travel, does this not create an issue in Pattaya / Thailand's tourism industry? The Chinese were Thailand';s biggest tourism market by a long way. Are you suggesting their absence leaves no void at all?