Dan O

No but explains why you seem to be clueless

That's a nonsense moronic answer and you know it

no idea what your talking about but its not surprising as you are coherent in your postings.

Seems you cant answer the question asked can you? I knew you couldnt so its no surprise. Where is he granted the authority to ignore the constitution, existing laws or judges rulings in legal cases? He cant and he doesnt have that authority does he? Just sit quietly hiding behind your keyboard being duped by a conman. He was elected to be the President and serve the people by upholding the constitution and laws of America correct? Its in he sworn oath and he isnt doing the duties he was elected to do by ignoring laws, judges orders and the constitution is he? No answer will be forthcoming Im sure, If he wants to deport people for valid reason the courts have been crystal clear, give them due process first. He's too stupid to follow the rules because he thinks they dont apply and I guess you are in his same camp.

Interestingly there are no public records available of many of these convictions available other than the claims presented by trumps minions. They also forget to included key information like the sentences were overturned or vacated or sentencing was completed. Perhaps you can fill in the blanks of where and when these convictions occurred and the other details for us?

Yeah it is gonna be a long 3.5 years for you and your buddies to see how many loses he has in court and eventually shut down by congress if he doesnt get impeached first. hang in there and we'll keep you updated when he F's up, in case you miss it.

He is the president and took an oath to uphold the constitution of the United States correct? He spoke those words in his oath at his swearing in. He is not doing that by breaking the law and ignoring direct rulings by the courts is he? Electing someone to that position does not give them ANY authority to break the law , ignore court rulings or ignore the constitution. you seem to be as ignorant about facts as your buffoon idol now arent you. Show us where is given the authority to ignore the constitution or legal rulings by the courts. it will be good reading. Im thinking your trump univ legal degree expired or you missed class that day.

to mr thumbs down explain why when a law is on the books and the court directs you to give due process first before deporting their is no reason not to as the person can be deported if they fail to present valid evidence on why they should be allowed to stay. To ignore a direct ruling and just deport without due process is breaking the law and thats what trumps cultist appointees are doing. now explain how they are not breaking the law and why they cant provide due process? Im betting you cant and wont give an answer

your explanation is flawed as usual. It's clearly split 50/50 unless you are self employed.

voters wanting something changed or fixed does not equate to allowing the president to break the law. there are legal channels to follow to accomplish that same outcome but trump is a buffoon masquerading as a person. if you think intentionally breaking the law when directed directly not to do what he did rather than using current laws or passing new laws is appropriate you are also part of the problem not part of the solution.

check yourself on that. Employees pay in 6.2 % of income to SS and the employer matches that with 6.2 %. if self employed then you pay all 12.4 %

If no one had been driving the car prior as implied and it was just sitting parked its unlikely it would spontaneously combust. Maybe want to check and see who he owes money to and hasnt paid.

That information does not prove anything except speculation and confirmation bias. Without the data you have no idea the level of research being conducted only that there was funding provided by the US and research of some type was being conducted by the Dr you are implicating. Could it have been a lab leak absolutely, could it have been natural occurrence absolutely. you obviously have decided the direction you are leaning and thats your prerogative. I am reserving judgement.

There's nothing to discuss or debate as neither theory can be proven currently, only speculated at. Lack of facts is not confirmation for either theory of source. Since there is no doubt the virus came from China in either scenario, its no wonder that China is less than forthcoming for all the reasons you listed and probably some you didn't list. The same with the absent data about the complete US involvement with funding and support for work in the labs on viral research. You or I can make a case for either being plausible which is what I said but its just opinion and goes nowhere without concrete information. Speculation gets no true answers, only more unverified questions and assumptions

Currently he is in the losing category on cases, fact.. Yes he's appealing them and the outcomes MAY change but currently he's losing on so many fronts. To try to use your logic is faulty as it hasn't happened. I live in reality and that means where we are now. If he had strong enough positions he wouldnt be losing the cases he has had to appeal.

You love to ramble dont you. I was clear on what I wrote. You can string together snippets of information on either side of this issue and then use it to support your own conclusion. Using that Info like that is what you have done and it's called an opinion nothing more. I stated clear either scenario was possible but currently unproven. I never gaslighted anything. You can go back and check the "intelligence sources" and see clearly the information came from the CIA report in connection with other intelligence agencies. Regardless it doesn't change the conclusion that was given, it was one possibility without significant verifiable supporting facts. No argument from the fence just a rational position that you cant verify either scenario currently and I'm not claiming either is correct at this point.

Exactly. The origin banks make the bulk of their fees from the conversions and you always get a better rate converting it at the destination bank. Added bonus with swift is its always coded correctly as an international transfer so no chasing extra documents or reports from inter-banking movements like with many "money movers"

You are stringing together cherry picked information and then supplying your own interpretation of what it means to match your claim. There is no proof either way and both scenarios are a possibility, nothing more. The CiA has not given any substantial conclusion as you imply so go back and fact check that. The rest is guessing based on lack of provable data as your support.

I have never commented on Biden so again you show the liar that you are with that repeated claim. Biden has nothing to do with this topic so stop deflecting You are obviously ignorant or purposing ignoring the widely available news reports of trumps actions and court cases which he is consistantly losing. so if your too lazy to research and understand what Trump has been doing thats on you. Your Trump love has blinded you to facts and you are not worth the time and effort as you dispute facts and truth but can never provide supporting information. You default to deflecting, gaslighting, changing the topic or just calling people trolls when you have no valid response. When all else fails you try to provide your twisted translation of whats been said to something unrelated as if you have superior intellect when in fact your just a lost sheep duped by a conman

The people that hate America seem to be the ones that want to ignore the constitution and bill of rights and not follow the laws that created the USA. You and your cult seem to fall into that category. There are legal avenues to follow to accomplish the issues at hand rather than try to just make a feeble demand justified by an inaccurate claim that Trump is trying to do what he was elected to do. He was not elected to ignore the constitution or established laws and just do anything he wants just on a whim or to flex the stupid belief he can just because he's tge president. Moronic logic you all use with those claims.

There were only a very select few labs in the world in a category capable to study viral diseases like covid so no its not surprising. But when you're guessing without facts anything is possible in your mind

Go to get your eyes checked. You may have a situation that can be corrected

And someone a bit higher in the food change

You shouldn't do the exchange at your origin bank. Do the exchange on arrival at Krungsri. The rate is much better and no additional fees. You can ask the for a Credit Note if you want proof of international transfer. Swift transfers are always coded correctly.

Heavy rain in Cambodia?