Dan O

That only works if there are US mfr making exportable goods the world wants at a price they can afford. Today's service economy in the US doesn't support that scenario very well and it will take quite a long time, if ever to rebuild the infrastructure in mfr to think about being competitive on the global stage. The cost of labor alone in the US is prohibitive to global mfr.

Thats because he's just a troll trying to stir up replies and then he has no facts or substance to support his delusional position so claims screeching and whining from posters. He isnt worth replying to anymore as he hasn't got the intellect to discuss the replies that he solicits.

Again nice try at twisting the situation to support your flawed thinking

Conveniently leaving out the fact that the ruling stipulated that the individuals must be notified and given due process in front of a judge first. That was the defect in the original deportation made by trumps admin and caused the original stay being placed by Boasberg.

That was a really nice try Perry Mason but you failed. Copy and pasting from Kristi Noem's filing is not a court ruling but I give you credit for at least attempting to make your argument. He was given the right to stay and not to be deported to El Salvador in his case in 2019. That is a legal right as he was not removed to a 3rd country or held in detention. He was released with an Ice Supervision Notice. No other court case was heard before he was deported revoking that right granted in 2019, correct? He was in fact illegally deported to El Salvador by the trump admin and they admitted such in the court case before the Supreme Court which was against the judges ruling in Oct 2019 was he not? You can claim "admin error" but in fact it was illegal until ruled otherwise in court not in your head or with your word salad. Again the admins own lawyers admitted that in the Supreme Court Case! You can claim DHS could deport him to a 3rd country after a hearing but he was not now was he? Did the Supreme Court rule yesterday it was a legal deportation and to leave him there without redress or put a stay in place on the return date while they rule LEGALLY what is the correct action. End of story. You have a nice day

You really are special arent you. He had legal status to stay in the US per the presiding judge in his case. The judge also ruled he could not be deported. That did not grant him citizenship nor did I say it did. He was legally allowed to be in the US until ruled otherwise. That never happened now did it? The ICE Order of Supervision is a tracking document like being on probation and having to report routinely. It does not mean he was here illegally. The deportation is being characterized as an "administration error" but in actuality it was illegal deportation and the lawyers for the admin admitted that in court. They are arguing that they dont want to agree to taking back anyone deported legally or otherwise. If they agree to return him it sets a precedence for all future cases and may create a loop hole the trump admin cant close. The Supreme Court agreed and put a stay on his return will they debate the issue of what to do LEGALLY. That does not mean they agree he was in the US without a legal standing. Check you google law degree as it might have expired

Thats just a load of mumbo jumbo bs so you can feel good that you contributed something even if its meaningless. The topic isn't about Russia or China but Trump and the US

Absolutely correct

No i think you proved you own point when you posted this topic.

News flash, when we geared up for world War II we had a manufacturing base in place already. Today we don't have that we are a service based economy. We gave that up in the 70's and 80' in place of expanded corporate profits for using offshore mfr due to tax issues and then as a follow on importation of cheap products. So yeah it would take about a decade to recover that full scale mfr base and infrastructure. I've never said we don't need to deal with the problems of the US but there's a smart way to do that with proper planning and execution. And then there's the utterly stupid, burn everything to the ground all at the same time and hope for the best to please a narcissistic megalomaniac that doesn't care of the impact to anyone as he's no in the same position as 95% of the US or world population

Nice try at presenting slightly distorted information. He was granted legal status in 2019 so yeah he was here legally after that ruling. DOJ already admitted he was deported in error so not sure what your on about other than you want to gloss over whats happening now. You go with that though

You and many others here act as if you can just stop imports and open a spigot and manufacturing will magically appear. Do you realize the lack of manufacturing capacity and infrastructure in the US don't you? How long do you think that it would take to gear up more capacity to be able to produce products? What do you think the cost for products would be and the impact on inflation as a result? Its easy to say just do this but in actuality it would be more than a decade to get completely off the ground

This has nothing to do with leftist so stay on topic. This is a trump create fiasco as usual.

Read the link the facts are there. The Supreme Court ruled on the case yesterday. Do some real research and you would know all this already but instead you only listen to the propaganda put out by Trump and his minions which is seldom close to reality.

No it actually relates to a legal alien that was deported in error. They admit it was an error but they are arguing they have no responsibility to repatriate anyone removed to a foreign country or black site. This action couple with the recently used Alien Enemies Act to deport anyone deemed an Alien Enemy being argued in other cases creates a scary scenario where anyone can be tagged as an enemy and there will be no due process in court. The group deported already were never proven to be connected to any gangs. While many probably were gang members there were a number that very well may not have been and they admitted that already

Its from the legal argument presented to the Supreme Court yesterday. It stems from the deportation order under the Aliens Enemies Act used earlier this year and the deportation of a legal alien which they admit was an error. Trumps admin is arguing that they can tag anyone as an illegal alien or terrorist and not have to prove it in court in other the other connected case. In this Supreme Court Case they are claiming once removed to a black site or foreign country they are not legally required to repatriate that person. Facts just keep getting in the way of many on this forum.

I believe the word is very accurate in the context of what is outlined by trump and his admin. If you have a better word that's accurate feel free to use it but you need to ask yourself how honest you are being about what's really going on and the massive impact trump's craziness is having on the US and the inflation, world economics, global supply chains, foreign relations, human rights, and world governmental power structures. Do you have any moral character and compass, or do you truly not care? Ask yourself

You hate when facts get in your way of continuing to live in your delusional world. When confronted with facts you post nonsense as a way to avoid what's really going on. Use your brain or have you lost it completely?

The OP is about Trump and America not China or Russia. Nice try at gaslighting the conversation. Try staying on topic even if the facts show the truth you refuse to admit.

How is pointing out the thai's behaved equally bad or worse with using a bottle to hit the foreigner making things up ? Or stating that it wasn't just 1 fat foreigner against 1 small thai guy, there were 3 thais fighting him. Or pointing out that you or I weren't there so we don't know what started the whole thing. Facts don't lie but they certainly get in the way of your faulty logic.

He said you you post bs and idiotic replies on AN forum.

I never said that so don't be a retard. There was interaction before that short video clip to start with. It wasn't just 1 thai fighting with the fat foreigner, there were at least three if you even watched the video. But none of that fits your narrative and we know you cant ever admit when your wrong.

What do you expect them to do? They have to try to protect their economies and global trade. How many countries economies are significantly impacted and dropping like a rock? You dont have a clue or care because it shows the flaws in your position and also trumps position.

Exactly my point. If you dont see the whole interaction you can't judge from a short video on what actually happened or what instigated the conflict. The media's job is to get readers so they tend to sensationalise everything to accomplish that goal.

You have no idea if I can speak thai or not. You post moronic bs when called out for your nonsensical posts.