Jump to content

James105

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    2,550
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by James105

  1. Yes, they have. This guy posted some memes. https://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/24513379.sellafield-worker-jailed-sharing-offensive-facebook-posts/ This one posted emojis: https://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/24506682.maryport-man-jailed-facebook-post-police-bid-stop-disorder/ Perhaps you can enlighten everyone why these characters deserved a harsher punishment than a pedophile who had "category A" images (the most extreme kind) of children as young as 7 on his phone.
  2. Her father would have been a terrorist which is the only explanation for why she would have had a terrorist issued pager. Maybe now he has lost his daughter he will reflect on his poor life choices that led to this and change his ways.
  3. Maybe the innocent bystanders will take the FAFO lesson they have received and decide terrorism is a silly game to play.
  4. So just to be clear, he didn't actually do anything then and approximately ZERO gays had to flee to Canada in the same way that hundreds or thousands of gays have to flee to Isreal from Palestine? So in Trumps America gays can still get married even though he was President for 4 years and didn't actually do anything to take away their rights? You're saying this is equivalent to Palestine? If that is the case it's an easy $1m dollars! When are you going to organise the pride parade?
  5. That would be fine if he didn't make such a big song and dance out of it when others broke the rules whilst he was in opposition. The fact he did so makes him a massive hypocrite.
  6. The tories presided over mass uncontrolled and mass illegal immigration despite being elected on a promise to reduce and control immigration. The tories are no longer in power as they did the exact opposite of what people voted them into power to do. If they had controlled immigration and stopped illegal immigration they would be in power today, and reform/Farage would be irrelevant. Those who get elected on false promises have no morals, as we are seeing from Labour today as they demonstrate unparalleled incompetence and hypocrisy. They will serve a single term and be replaced by a Tory/reform coalition I should think unless they follow Europe and start to tackle the uncontrolled legal and illegal immigration problem.
  7. Has anyone checked on Jeremy Corbyn to see if he is okay?
  8. Socialist doing what socialists do shocker. "Those with the broadest shoulders will have to pay" he says, whilst paying for nothing himself even though he is a multi millionaire and removing the winter fuel allowance from vulnerable pensioners. Maybe 5 years of this will wake people up to the fact that whilst socialism sounds good on paper to the young and naive, it destroys lives, wrecks economies and kills millions. Hopefully this will put it to bed for another generation once this 5 years is up.
  9. 2 tier policing didn't just start under the clown Starmer. It's been going on for decades. The police were complicit in the rape of children, even arresting the children and fathers of the children instead of the rapists. The chief constable at the centre of this didn't go to jail, he retired in 2016 on a £2m pension. I don't recall seeing any of the police complicit in these rapes going to jail either, but I do recall Tommy Robinson going to jail for contempt of court for reporting on it. Leftists to this day continue to be more outraged about Tommy Robinson for speaking out about these child rapists, than the fact that men from a certain culture were raping children and the police let them do it with impunity.
  10. Honestly, the people supporting this never ending war just sound like proles from 1984 to me at this point, pontificating about something where the only knowledge they have is the propaganda they are fed from the media. It's tiresome. The west is enabling this war by funding it. The sooner this stops the sooner the war ends.
  11. How long is too long for you for this to go on for? Another 5 years? 10 years? 20 years? Forever? Do you want UK and US troops to be involved? Maybe a nuclear bomb or 2? How much money do you think is too much? another $100bn? $1tn? $10tn? If you don't want this to continue forever what do you suggest to stop it? I don't particularly care if someone is considered a 'winner' as I am not a child and think there are better things to do with these resources. Unless the western military get involved (which would be a ridiculous waste of life and money) then it will be a forever stand off. Yes some lines might get redrawn and some people will have to swap one corrupt leader for another but at least they will live. My suggestion to save lives and stop wasting money is to stop funding it. What is yours?
  12. If your goal is a forever war then that is an excellent approach to take. Both Ukraine and Russia are corrupt. The media spreads propaganda suggesting this is good vs evil but I doubt that is even close to being true. What is accurate is there are no winners in war other than the arms manufacturers and those who help themselves to the money being used to fund it. The losers are: 1. Russian people. 2. Ukrainian people. 3. The western taxpayers funding this nonsense. The only reason it continues is that the western taxpayer is funding it. Nobody voted to fund this war in the USA or the UK and I should think taxpayers from these countries could think of many, many better things to spend the money on. Remove the funding and Zelenski and Putin will be forced to negotiate.
  13. Jeez these psychopaths are determined to escalate this into something bigger. How about being radical and seeking de-escalation and peace negotiations instead of keeping the war going.
  14. They haven't enacted it yet. Hungary was fined 200m euros and a 1m euro fine a day for not allowing cultural enrichment into their country. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clww729180po So erm... being a member of the EU will cost them, but it is an absolute bargain in comparison to how much illegal immigrants cost a country both financially and socially.
  15. Assumed based on his performance thus far, yes. He didn't even bother to carry out an impact assessment for the winter fuel allowance and how many old people he will kill prematurely as a result of its removal, nor did he bother to actually confirm the details of the so called "£22bn black hole" as the treasury are still "checking this for accuracy" and won't release details so it is reasonable to assume he didn't bother considering alternatives to this as well. Releasing criminals onto the streets before their sentence is complete to cause mayhem is the kind of behaviour I would expect to see from Joker in a batman movie, not the PM of a democratic country.
  16. He didn't even look for alternatives. He immediately settled on the easiest option because he is a moron. Jailing people for posting mean words on facebook is wrong on every possible level, even more so when real criminals have to be released early as there isn't enough space. Anyone who has an IQ in double figures would recognise that.
  17. 1. He didn't need to lock up people who posted hurty word tweets on facebook. 2. He could have released early and deported foreign criminals. I think the real problem though is that his weakness as a leader and a as a man is now on full display to the public. Every day there is a new instance that demonstrates how much of a hypocrite he is, or how thoroughly out of depth he is. He was able to get away with his catalog of mistakes in the CPS (Jimmy Saville, Rochdale etc) as no-one really knew who he was, or as opposition leader where there were no consequences to his actions but now he is PM he is under the spotlight, and it is proving disastrous for him and his party as he cannot hide or blame someone else like 'the government'. I think if he is not already, he is going to be the most hated PM in modern history by all sides of politics.
  18. His popularity is tanking so he needs a war, just like every other weak leader in history.
  19. Here is a link for you: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13848473/Prisoner-charged-sexual-assault-ONE-HOUR-freed-jail-Labours-scheme.html He couldn't wait even 1 hour before sexually assaulting someone after his release from prison early. They are going to release thousands more in the next few weeks as well. What an amazing government we have. You must be so proud.
  20. If you want your life controlled by an authoritarian, tyrannical government wouldn't you be better moving to a country that already offers such a thing? North Korea and China would offer the kind of lifestyle you would wish to impose on others. I have no problem with fatties being weighed and charged extra whenever they need to use a health service, just as I would have no problem with airlines charging those for 2 seats if they cannot fit into one, but taking away personal responsibility is ridiculous and healthy folks should not have to be treated like children just because some people cannot control what they put into their mouths.
  21. And parents watch TV after 9pm when these adverts will still be shown making this intervention pointless. Are you ready to admit these clowns in government are completely out of their depth and have no idea what they are doing yet?
  22. Oops. No wonder they are nervous about Twitter as it contains their posting history. I wonder when she will start to hold herself to her own standards?
  23. He is also doing well with the criminals. All those that were released early will be lifelong Labour voters so I would expect to see legislation introduced that will allow serving prisoners to vote at some point in the next 5 years as he won't want to lose their vote when they are put back inside after they next get caught committing crimes.
  24. The problem is that when a party does as badly as the current Labour party is doing the only thing the opposition needs to do is complain without offering any solutions. This is how Labour achieved their huge majority by whinging at everything the then government did and offered no solutions - they were not electable but got elected anyway on a lower vote count than Labour received in 2019. What is fundamentally clear is they had no concrete plans of what to do when they got into government and it is showing. Starmer is a weak man and is so far out of his depth he is drowning, and they don't have anyone else who is capable of taking over.
  25. Musk won't step foot in the UK whilst this government is in charge as he is fully aware of white people being imprisoned for mean tweets and hurty words in the UK and it would be a needless risk to take. The UK government are a laughing stock around the world. Nobody, especially not Musk, will take their requests seriously.
×
×
  • Create New...