James105

Well done Labour. Well done. Economically illiterate morons.

Let me simplify for you. He was in prison because of a 2 tier justice system. He has never previously been in trouble with the law and as his very first offence, despite pleading guilty and showing remorse and the fact the judge even said he committed no violent acts, he was thrown into prison for 2 years 8 months and killed himself. If he was a muslim it is very clear he would not have spent one day in jail (as per the example I provided you ignored for the exact same guilty plea to the exact same offence) and would be alive today.

I'm just confused as to why you think it is your job to copy/paste in an AI response to something you admit you know little about without even giving credit to the AI that formulated the response for you. Is it a little hobby of yours or something?

What erroneous statement did I make here? I pointed out you used AI for a response and that you didn't credit the AI for providing you with it. Seems fairly accurate to me. If you don't have the knowledge or wherewithal to formulate a response of your own then perhaps don't bother?

Why don't you credit the AI you clearly used with the response rather than pretending it was your own?

Why you using ChatGPT? You don't have thoughts or opinions of your own?

So because you are unable to address any of the uncomfortable truths you resort to the vacuous phrase of "inflammatory political point scoring".

This was a horrific crime and the public have a right to know what the government and police are doing to protect their daughters from the very real threat of Islamic terrorism, not covering it up and spreading misinformation that it was a Christian boy from Wales who did this. Starmer could have spent the 3 months dealing with the very real threat of Islamic terrorism rather than the imaginary threat of the "far right", but instead - being the weak, cowardly man that he is - chose to appease Islam even giving them more taxpayers money to protect the mosques even though that is where the real threat is. This police/justice system let predominantly Pakistani men rape young white girls/children for many, many years before reluctantly addressing the problem after pressure from the press and certain MPs. This is why the police/justice system cannot be trusted and left to "proceed", especially when it involves islamic terror as they are too scared to do their jobs properly and the pressure needs to be continuously applied to make sure they do so. See Manchester airport thugs as another example of what happens when the police/justice system is left to simply "proceed" unchecked.

Why are you deflecting? I provided an example case (with a BBC news link) that went to trial of a person wrongfully arrested on behalf of this tyrannical government for posting on social media who was rightly acquitted by a jury. If he had caved into pressure the same way Wayne O'Rourke did then he would be currently spending 2+ years in jail. Peter Lynch is dead. A grandfather with no previous convictions who pleaded guilty to "violent disorder" despite not committing any violence and for his very first offence in his 61 years was sentenced to 2 years 8 months prison. Here is an example of other people pleading guilty of "violent disorder" who received suspended sentences and no jail time. Can you spot the difference?

Nonsense. Since these are not career criminals we are talking about here and most have never been in trouble before then they would have trusted the poor advice from their public "defender" and caved into the pressure of a promise of a more lenient sentence. The only one who refused to cave in to this pressure was acquitted by a jury. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpqd9ljgqd9o The "crime" that he was wrongly arrested for, remanded in custody and then bailed with a tag, was for posting (correctly as it turns out) that a muslim had carried out the attack. He was also pressured to plead guilty for a more lenient sentence. Everyone currently in jail who did not commit any violence or looting should be immediately released. Obviously it is too late for the grandfather (with no prior criminal record and committed no violence) since he is now dead because of this tyrannical government.

Don't worry yourself. No trials will ever be in danger from the kinds of vacuous statements you post on this forum. I'm sure if you ever did dare to give an opinion not regurgitated from the government or your leftist media overlords it would have about as much impact on a trial as the £22bn Ed Milliband is planning to fritter away on "carbon capture" will have on the environment. That impact being none of course.

So the fact that Starmer lied to the public and in doing so incited more civil unrest, the fact the government and police covered up the true nature of this crime and accused others of misinformation when they were saying facts, the fact that ricin was found in his home and it appears nothing was done to address the safety of the neighbourhood, the fact that people are in jail right now for crimes that would not have been crimes had the truth been revealed immediately. All of that and your hot take is to accuse Jenrick of playing politics instead of lambasting Starmer for his lies? If your comment was parody (which I actually assume it must be) then I take the above back and would say your comment was amusing.

This whatsapp message was doing the rounds shortly after the attack. It sounded plausible at the time but with all the misinformation being spread by Starmer, the home secretary, the police and people like you it was largely ignored. I have little doubt in my mind (especially after the recent revelations) that it is most likely credible. It's certainly more plausible than he was a Christian with mental problems now that they have reluctantly revealed (part of) the truth isn't it?

The troubling revelations continue. Why is Starmer shutting down the press? The man is clearly a tyrant and he needs to be removed from his post. He simply cannot continue.

It's also troubling that this ricin development has only just been revealed. When Novichok was discovered in Salisbury the town was immediately shut down and decontaminated. What action was taken here? Were the neighbours informed and evacuated following this discovery or was their safety compromised to prevent the truth from coming out? Starmer and whoever the home secretary is should be resigning and facing the consequences of their lies to the public and apologising to the likes of Farage who correctly raised concerns about important information being withheld.

Your post was never correct, it was just a regurgitation of the misinformation spread by the police and Starmer. I rightly said that it had the hallmarks of Islamic terror and information was being suppressed. What other culture/religion kills kids in this way? It's not the real or imagined far right is it? The mostly peaceful protests following the terror attack in Southport could have been quelled very easily if Starmer had told the truth from the beginning, and promised to address the very real problem of Islamic terror. This monster came from a 2% Islamic country to a 6.7% islamic country and was radicalised into killing little innocent girls. He was given every opportunity to live a normal life even appearing in Dr Who, yet the Islamic problem is so severe in the UK now even at that percentage he was able to be Islamised. Starmer should face consequences here. So should the home secretary. Everyone in jail for the mostly peaceful protests should immediately have their sentences reviewed.

You are guilty of misinformation. Here is an example from one of your 108 posts on this topic.

Of course it was an Islamic attack on those little girls, literally no-one with a brain cell is surprised in the slightest. The PR team for this monster deserve an award for making him out to be an innocent christian schoolboy from wales who once appeared in Dr Who. Even now we are seeing pictures of a 10 year old rather than a photo of what this monster looks like now. So all those jailed for spreading "misinformation" (which wasn't misinformation at all) about his motives have now been proven correct and I have little doubt that both the police and Starmer knew it within the first hours/days afterwards. Would there have been civil unrest in the following days if the police and Starmer had been transparent from the beginning and promised to address the very real threat of Islamic terror rather than the imaginary threat of the "far right"?

"supportive of due process in the administration of law and order" is not a view on what happened, its a deferral to a system that has so far failed to charge those muslim thugs who smashed a female police officers nose yet sentenced a women to 31 months imprisonment for a facebook post. A "view" of what happened would be to state whether or not his feral behaviour was acceptable as an MP who has the prefix "the right honourable" in front of his name. As I mentioned I don't expect you to be able to provide such a view as it falls outside of your capabilities here.

The only defence he could have for hitting someone is self defence, but since the person he attacked had his hands in his pockets and showed no threatening behaviour that defence is out, especially so as he didn't walk away after sucker punching the man to the ground but continued to rain down punches on the man like a feral animal. I don't have a problem with what you said in much the same way that I don't have a problem with what NPCs say when I am playing Grand Theft Auto as it's just a pre-programmed response from a character that doesn't hold any views of their own. It's expected and predictable, but sometimes I still engage with them for mild amusement to see what their programmers have told them to say given a particular scenario.

So you think the MP could have been justified sucker punching his constituent and then continuously punching him when he was on the ground based on words (possibly even unpleasant words) the constituent may have said? Where in the law does it allow a person to do that?

Investigate what? You don't need to get Sherlock Holmes involved here to look for clues as its literally on video. He sucker punched a guy who had his hands in his pockets and then proceeded to continue to punch him whilst he was on the ground and looks to have thrown a few kicks in for good measure. The Labour MP is an absolute thug and if Peter Lynch can be given a 2 year 8 month sentence for holding up a placard with uncomfortable words and shouting at police then this should be a much more significant jail sentence. People have died after being sucker punched after all so a strong message needs to be sent to inform leftist thugs that this kind of behaviour is unacceptable. This Labour government is and continues to be an absolute clown show. The 20% of the electorate who voted for these morons should be hanging their heads in shame.

Removal of racist policies and not participating in the climate scam is hardly controversial. Trump has been president before. He is not president at the moment. What does that tell you?

Shame she doesn't have the same energy when 2 actual law abiding citizens from the "black community" are killed. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/sep/02/notting-hill-carnival-deaths Unfortunately for these people from the "black community" they were not killed by a white policeman, but instead by fellow black people so these black lives do not matter to her and nothing whatsoever needs to be done to prevent similar deaths occurring in future. Sadly for Ms Abbot the agonising wait for the UK's George Floyd moment continues.