James105

Perhaps because he wasn't PM and wasn't in his control. How do you think government actually works? Based in this comment then I presume you must think a single minister can decide to do something off his own back without any kind of support from anyone else in government. He did the only thing within his power he could do and resigned his position as the government wasn't going as far as he wanted.

Always with the lies. No wonder you didn't post the actual links. Searching 1185 migrants in google does brink up a match....from 4 weeks ago

Factual comment you mean? "And then there was Stephen Parkinson, the director of public prosecutions for England and Wales. He took to social media to warn the populace against sharing news of the country’s riots online. Law enforcement is “scouring” the internet for harmful content, he said. " https://nationalpost.com/opinion/amy-hamm-free-speech-isnt-a-threat-to-the-u-k-censorship-is

You are going to need to back that up. This link says 5000. https://www.gbnews.com/news/migrant-crisis-nearly-5000-cross-channel-small-boats-since-election-labour-keir-starmer

The police are busy scouring the internet for hurty words. Their role has changed so the UK will be more reliant on security guards going forwards.

How would I a link for something "that appears to be"? Just take a look at the news if you need evidence.

According to Robert Jenrick, each illegal immigrant that gets to the UK costs the taxpayer £400,000 on average. So the 5000 illegal immigrants who arrived since Labour took power will cost the taxpayer £2bn - imagine how many nurses and carers that could pay for, and other things the left pretend to care about. Doing nothing to stop them is expensive in comparison to protecting the borders I would think.

Money. There is money to be made from the movement of humans. Contracts for housing them, contracts for feeding them, contracts for imprisoning them when they stab someone. People make money from this and not just the people smuggling gangs. Labour won't stop it either, but their goal appears to be destruction of society as we know it rather than greed.

If cigarettes are more concerning than vaping then why is vaping illegal and cigarette smoking legal then?

It doesn't have anything to do with religion either but those on the left highlight he is a muslim (example provided). Did you complain about this comment? If the left do not want Islam to be associated with the thousands of bad things they do then perhaps avoiding bringing their religion into the occasional good thing they do might be a start, otherwise that is known as 'having cake and eating it'.

No need to cry. It's just 2 guys having a conversation that share similar political views. Harris can have a chat with one of the (many) leftist outfits that will have a similar conversation with her that share her political views.

The people cheering on this tyranny seem to think they are safe from this as they are on the "right side" of it. They are not. It's only the elites that are protected under tyrannical regimes and they would do well to remember that. "A man who falsely claimed on a live-streamed TikTok video that he was “running for his life” from rioters in Derby has been jailed. Dimitrie Stoica had been livestreaming to 700 followers as he walked around Derby on Wednesday 7 August – the same evening that potential protests and disorder had been feared might take place in the city." https://www.derbyshire.police.uk/news/derbyshire/news/news/south/2024/august/man-jailed-after-fake-claim-on-tiktok-video-that-he-was-running-for-his-life-from-rioters/

There is a large enough contingent of the white population who think the only people who can be racist are white people, which is obviously ridiculous, but that is how it happens.

Well Yousaf is a racist, so I am not surprised you are not surprised that I think so.

He called Yousaf a racist, which is an entirely accurate description. Musk also clarified in the second part that: "Legal discovery will show that however big a racist he’s been in public communications, he is vastly worse in private communications." Yousaf clearly has been an even bigger racist in his private communications on X (that Musk will have access to) than he is in public. Musk is not racist and if you are claiming he is then back it up with evidence.

The reason that the imaginary monsters were not in the street is that they are imaginary. The gullible left fell for fake posts on telegram that were written exactly like the left wing middle class think that working class people would speak like. It seems you fell for it too. Bless.

Well, the fact that there was no "far right" on the street, only muslim thugs armed with weapons damaging property and intimidating BBC and Sky news reporters should be evidence enough, but since you ask... https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/aug/07/thousands-of-anti-racism-protesters-take-to-streets-to-counter-far-right-rallies " Earlier Earlier Nick Lowles, a long standing expert on the British far right, and who now leads Hope Not Hate, told the Guardian that he was sceptical there would be widespread trouble on Wednesday evening. The expectation was triggered by a list of targets found on social media. Lowles, speaking before this evening said: “I think it’s a hoax, designed to spread fear and panic. “The list has been compiled by one man in Liverpool, who simply googled immigration law firms etc." Only the really gullible fell for it though, so it could have been worse.

You seem to have posted an article about the "far right" hoax by left wing agitators that the gullible media fell for. There was no "far right" on the streets that evening, but there was plenty of violent muslim thugs armed with weapons out on the streets. There is plenty of evidence for that if you would like to see it. The BBC and Sky accidentally recorded it too. Like I said, the problem with imaginary monsters is that they are really hard to find.

So now they are just "right wing" thugs? Seem to be changing your tune. Is that because despite frantically searching for evidence of far right and nazi saluters you can only find pro hamas protestors doing so? Oh dear. The trouble with imaginary monsters is that they are really hard to find.

1. Tyranny always starts with the pretense of "security" and your "safety" and then escalates from there. 2. Just saying what I am seeing. 3. There are more then tens of thousands of people in the UK. There is no "far right", hence the reason no "far right" turned up to the supposed 100 organized riots by the "far right" which was a hoax (misinformation if you will) by the "far left". "Far right" just a divisive term used by the tyrant to cause division and justify his tyrannical actions. He won't even define what he considers to be "far right" as to do so in the context of the recent rioting would mean describing them as disaffected working class white people who get angry when little girls get murdered, not the swastika tattooed thugs that spring to mind when that term is used. Whatever the white people did on the streets it pales into insignificance when compared to what the 2nd generation immigrant did to those girls.

The PM is a tyrant e.g 1. The use of police to create a visible threat to any dissent and show trials for dissenters. 2. The use of surveillance to create paranoia 3. Social fragmentation of the population and pitting groups against each other using the imaginary "far right". He is ticking all the tyrannical boxes and he knows his government is built on a house of cards with only 20% share of the electoral vote. I think the UK is on a very dark path.

Can you give me an example of something you think she has said that is transphobic?

Doesn't really need a crystal ball does it? Labour in charge: 1. Remove any kind of deterrent. 2. Have a reputation from the criminal people smugglers as "the friendly man". 3. Appoint a home secretary that advertises on social media that "refugees are welcome". 4. Literally do nothing other rename border force to border control or whatever. 5. Grant 100,000 illegal immigrants asylum (or in Labour terminology - process 100,000 claims). If people are allowed a free vote in 5 years time I imagine more people will make the effort to vote for anyone but this tyrannical Labour regime, especially the ones who didn't vote this time as they didn't think it would make any difference whether it was Tory or Labour.

Well, for starters there hasn't yet been a genocidal civil war in Britain (yet), so there is that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_genocide