James105

"Brooklyn Motorist Arrested for Threatening to Kill Jews" Those pesky "Brooklyn motorists". Do all "Brooklyn motorists" want to kill jews? Is it related to the traffic conditions over there? Wonder if there is anything else afoot that would cause this resentment towards jews.

This was indeed painful to watch. They should really try scripting it in advance rather than attempting to ad-lib something thrown together at the last minute without any kind of rehearsal, especially if they could not find any comedians to participate in this sketch.

I'm anti-terrorist. Whoever is killing terrorists gets my approval. If you would prefer the bombings to stop then it will once either the terrorists are killed or they surrender and return the innocent civilian hostages who are most likely being raped and tortured on a daily basis by their captors. Why is it do you think that neighbouring muslim countries have not opened their doors so that the "innocent" Palestinians can take refuge there?

And leave the terrorists on their doorstep to plan and carry out more rapes, murders, kidnappings and mutilations of innocent Jews? Do you really hate the Jews so much that you do not wish them to be able to defend themselves from these kind of atrocities?

What kind of punishment do you think this guy deserves for his nazi salute?

Hamas can stop the killing right now, today, by returning the hostages and surrendering. Why is it on Isreal to stop when they were the ones who had people raped, maimed, butchered in cold blood? Do you really hate Jews that much you don't want them to be able to defend themselves against the terrorists on their doorsteps? If the Palestinians are all so innocent why is it do you think the neighbouring muslim countries are not opening their doors and welcoming them into their countries?

The UN rulings are non binding advisories and are not law so there was no need for the UK to do anything. It was the wrong thing to do. They didn't even ask the islanders. Mauritius has never owned the islands and have no claim to them and not just that, they are an ally to a strategic rival in China. On top of that the UK will now be paying rent on this which will be an embarrassing amount of money which is why Labour are not telling how much as though they can keep it secret indefinately - that is how stupid they are. This Labour government has made many stupid, ill conceived, embarrassing choices since they gained power that make the UK poorer, weaker and less secure. This is just one of so, so many. They are out of their depth and out of control. Absolute clown show.

Don't forget solar panels!! Look how green these fields are:

Rerun the islands? Bit early to be drinking isn't it? If you meant to say "return" then that would be equally nonsensical considering that Mauritius has never actually owned them. As the article says, starting negotiations is not the same as concluding them, and Labour have form for being pathetically weak negotiators as we saw from the capitulation with the train drivers who were given everything they wanted for absolutely nothing in return. Now Labour will have to face the embarrassment of owning up to their incompetence and how much more taxpayers money they have squandered for nothing in return. Utter shambles of a government.

There fraudsters are not asking for your money though as they are taking it regardless to enrich themselves, and as long as there are enough useful idiots who believe humans have any significant impact on the climate then they will continue to get away with it. Labour in the UK are wasting £22bn of taxpayers money on ludicrous, unproven nonsense such as "carbon capture", which aims to capture just 2.4% of the total emissions per year of the UK's emissions and bury them in the ground, and the UK are responsible for just 1% of the global emissions anyway. They could have planted trees which have been doing this job free of charge for millions of years, but of course that would not make the rich people richer.

He does not represent the interests of the British people or the country. Every action taken so far has been to weaken the UK. The clowns are now going to create a £22bn black hole by spending this amount of taxpayers money on carbon capture (an unproven technology) so their friends in the oil industry can keep burning oil. Was this in the manifesto? Of course it wasn't. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/oct/04/labour-to-commit-almost-22bn-to-fund-carbon-capture-and-storage-projects At some point even you will have to concede that these people are clowns who are either outrageously corrupt or outrageously stupid.

Give what another go? You want a link to a labour politician stating that the only reason they did this was to distract the attention away from a weak PM who has a penchant for receiving gifts from sugar daddies so there was no choice but to weaken the UK by giving away strategic territories to strategic rivals at great expense to the tax payer? I highly doubt that even these clowns would admit to such a thing, but anyone with a double digit IQ can see the obvious for what it is. I can't it if you cannot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_cat_strategy The UN? No country abides by their motions unless it benefits them as their rulings are non binding. The fact the clowns in government did just shows how weak they are. The clowns transferred sovereignty of a strategic territory to a state it never belonged to who is an ally of a strategic rival and agreed to pay for the privilege. Still, it gives the media something else to talk about other than Free Gear Keirs sugar daddy gifts as that story was not going away. Oh, and the Chagos islanders feel betrayed too, so there is that.

This pointless and needless action is going to cost money: "As part of the deal, the U.K. will retain sovereignty of Diego Garcia for an initial period of 99 years, and will pay Mauritius an undisclosed rent. It will also create a “resettlement” fund for displaced Chagossians aimed at letting them move back to the islands other than Diego Garcia." https://apnews.com/article/uk-mauritius-chagos-diego-garcia-base-37d13bf54f9769f3621bd41d08a448f8 How much will it cost the UK then to rent these islands then? There is a reason it is "undisclosed" as it will be an embarrassing amount of money. There was no urgent need for this. Nobody was making lots of noise about it. The only reason for it is a distraction. I understand their need to change the news agenda as they are getting hammered for Free gear kiers penchant for gifts from sugar daddies, but this will cost yet more taxpayers money being frittered away abroad for nothing in return. Argentina will be next demanding the Falklands, followed by Spain with Gibraltar as they have seen how weak and useless these clowns are.

It's not a return as these islands were never "owned" by Mauritius, who will now be charging the UK 'rent' on something given to them that they have never owned. This is why the Tories never went through with it as even they are not daft enough to do this. The reason this has happened out of the blue is to move the media away from discussing free gear Kier's sugar daddy, which will no doubt end up costing the tax payer countless billions as he is a weak man unable to cope with justifiable criticism. These clowns are out of their depth and out of control.

Did they even ask the people that lived there before giving it away? It's not even just giving it away, it is giving it away and then paying them to have it with taxpayers money for an undisclosed amount. I presume this is yet another thing that wasn't on the manifesto and doesn't face a vote in parliament? How are they even allowed to do this? Every day Labour does something that makes the UK weaker, less secure and poorer.

Literally nobody cares. They were used to take out terrorists with almost zero civilian casualties and did a fine job of it.

The only reason it targets climate protests is that they are the ones committing crimes instead of just peacefully protesting about their nonsense. If they could just hold up their "end of the world is nigh" signs peacefully without obstructing other people as they go about their business they will be just fine.

Except their policies and behaviour are a surprise to everyone. Labour didn't face scrutiny in the build up to the election as the legacy media focused their attention on Reform who were never going to win, so it came as a surprise that Free gear Keir has been on the take from his billionaire sugar daddy in return for what, we don't know yet. Adults don't receive presents "one way" as they are not children so lets call it what it is, a bribe. This is especially galling considering how sanctimonious he has been towards the Tories over the last few years. Also, there was no winter fuel allowance removal on their manifesto so that also came as a surprise. He also said he would freeze energy bills so its coming as a surprise to people they are going up by 10%. Students are next to be surprised I should think if they go ahead with the 13% rise in student fees. So yes, I would say their policies are a surprise. How many of that list above were on their manifesto? None. They obtained power by fraud as if these were manifesto promises and/or his desire for him and his "wife" be bought clothes by sugar daddies had come out earlier I very much doubt they would have received the 33% of the vote that got them into power.

People haven't learnt a thing. They bought the lies that took away their freedoms and caused devastation to the economy, caused countless unnecessary deaths and will do the same next time. Most people are just incredibly susceptible to propaganda, especially the kind that relies on their fear.

The lib dems received less votes than reform.

They owe their victory to the Tories and the freakish nature of the electoral system. Starmer received less votes as leader than Labour did previously under Corbyn. It's fascinating that people give Starmer the credit for happening to be leader of the Labour party when this freak of circumstances occurred but also suggest he bears zero responsibility for being the leader of the CPS when they chose not to prosecute Jiimmy Saville or the Harrods owner - another position he clearly failed at. He should be riding high in the polls with a Tory party without a new leader and the opportunity he has been given but he is tanking. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/sep/28/keir-starmer-hits-new-low-in-personal-popularity-ratings

Every day there is a new story out about the sanctimonious hypocrite. It's not by accident and it most likely is coming from within the Labour party. The rumour is that there is something much bigger being hidden by a super injunction and that is probably being held back to ensure it is released at the most ruinous time. He's already toast I think, just a matter of when, not if.

It's not really wishful thinking though is it as there is no chance of an election to get rid of these clowns for another 4.5 years, and whoever follows this hypocritical tedious clown is going to be worse, probably a lot worse as they are a talentless bunch at best. Apparently the next targets on their list for "those with the broadest shoulders" is going to be the students, with a 13% increase in fees. It's almost as though they are determined to never govern again after seeing out this term.

"the virus was not dangerous to those under 80 and in reasonable health" The majority of those that the virus killed were unhealthy in some way, particularly the obese. Making people stay indoors, closing gyms, parks, turning the NHS into a covid only service has killed more people than doing nothing ever could.