James105

Isn't this the same person who has just given £10bn worth of inflation busting pay rises to the public sector despite their productivity being nearly 7% lower than 2019 levels? The clowns in the big top continue to be clowns. Quelle surprise.

That may have been the case in the past, but I do not think that is accurate now.

It's this lack of acknowledgement that there is a problem amongst certain communities (not present in others such as Atheist, Jews, Christians, Pagans, Millwall supporters etc), that come from cultures that treat women/children 'differently' to how women are treated in the west that is making the west a more dangerous place for women. Take the following story about violent crimes against women on public transport which has increased 50% as an example. What do you think the reason for this is if you were to hazard a guess? https://www.itv.com/news/2024-08-14/violent-crimes-against-women-on-britains-trains-jump-by-more-than-50?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1723614464 If the UK is to ever become a cohesive and safe society again the bigotry of low expectations really needs to stop and highly uncomfortable conversations acknowledging the problems need to take place and then potential solutions can be debated fully. Instead of doing this the proposals I am hearing is to give women separate carriages, something that has not been needed since the 1830s.

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

The people have lost respect for the police you say? I just cannot imagine why...

Perhaps because he wasn't PM and wasn't in his control. How do you think government actually works? Based in this comment then I presume you must think a single minister can decide to do something off his own back without any kind of support from anyone else in government. He did the only thing within his power he could do and resigned his position as the government wasn't going as far as he wanted.

Always with the lies. No wonder you didn't post the actual links. Searching 1185 migrants in google does brink up a match....from 4 weeks ago

Factual comment you mean? "And then there was Stephen Parkinson, the director of public prosecutions for England and Wales. He took to social media to warn the populace against sharing news of the country’s riots online. Law enforcement is “scouring” the internet for harmful content, he said. " https://nationalpost.com/opinion/amy-hamm-free-speech-isnt-a-threat-to-the-u-k-censorship-is

You are going to need to back that up. This link says 5000. https://www.gbnews.com/news/migrant-crisis-nearly-5000-cross-channel-small-boats-since-election-labour-keir-starmer

The police are busy scouring the internet for hurty words. Their role has changed so the UK will be more reliant on security guards going forwards.

How would I a link for something "that appears to be"? Just take a look at the news if you need evidence.

According to Robert Jenrick, each illegal immigrant that gets to the UK costs the taxpayer £400,000 on average. So the 5000 illegal immigrants who arrived since Labour took power will cost the taxpayer £2bn - imagine how many nurses and carers that could pay for, and other things the left pretend to care about. Doing nothing to stop them is expensive in comparison to protecting the borders I would think.

Money. There is money to be made from the movement of humans. Contracts for housing them, contracts for feeding them, contracts for imprisoning them when they stab someone. People make money from this and not just the people smuggling gangs. Labour won't stop it either, but their goal appears to be destruction of society as we know it rather than greed.

If cigarettes are more concerning than vaping then why is vaping illegal and cigarette smoking legal then?

It doesn't have anything to do with religion either but those on the left highlight he is a muslim (example provided). Did you complain about this comment? If the left do not want Islam to be associated with the thousands of bad things they do then perhaps avoiding bringing their religion into the occasional good thing they do might be a start, otherwise that is known as 'having cake and eating it'.

No need to cry. It's just 2 guys having a conversation that share similar political views. Harris can have a chat with one of the (many) leftist outfits that will have a similar conversation with her that share her political views.

The people cheering on this tyranny seem to think they are safe from this as they are on the "right side" of it. They are not. It's only the elites that are protected under tyrannical regimes and they would do well to remember that. "A man who falsely claimed on a live-streamed TikTok video that he was “running for his life” from rioters in Derby has been jailed. Dimitrie Stoica had been livestreaming to 700 followers as he walked around Derby on Wednesday 7 August – the same evening that potential protests and disorder had been feared might take place in the city." https://www.derbyshire.police.uk/news/derbyshire/news/news/south/2024/august/man-jailed-after-fake-claim-on-tiktok-video-that-he-was-running-for-his-life-from-rioters/

There is a large enough contingent of the white population who think the only people who can be racist are white people, which is obviously ridiculous, but that is how it happens.

Well Yousaf is a racist, so I am not surprised you are not surprised that I think so.

He called Yousaf a racist, which is an entirely accurate description. Musk also clarified in the second part that: "Legal discovery will show that however big a racist he’s been in public communications, he is vastly worse in private communications." Yousaf clearly has been an even bigger racist in his private communications on X (that Musk will have access to) than he is in public. Musk is not racist and if you are claiming he is then back it up with evidence.

The reason that the imaginary monsters were not in the street is that they are imaginary. The gullible left fell for fake posts on telegram that were written exactly like the left wing middle class think that working class people would speak like. It seems you fell for it too. Bless.

Well, the fact that there was no "far right" on the street, only muslim thugs armed with weapons damaging property and intimidating BBC and Sky news reporters should be evidence enough, but since you ask... https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/aug/07/thousands-of-anti-racism-protesters-take-to-streets-to-counter-far-right-rallies " Earlier Earlier Nick Lowles, a long standing expert on the British far right, and who now leads Hope Not Hate, told the Guardian that he was sceptical there would be widespread trouble on Wednesday evening. The expectation was triggered by a list of targets found on social media. Lowles, speaking before this evening said: “I think it’s a hoax, designed to spread fear and panic. “The list has been compiled by one man in Liverpool, who simply googled immigration law firms etc." Only the really gullible fell for it though, so it could have been worse.

You seem to have posted an article about the "far right" hoax by left wing agitators that the gullible media fell for. There was no "far right" on the streets that evening, but there was plenty of violent muslim thugs armed with weapons out on the streets. There is plenty of evidence for that if you would like to see it. The BBC and Sky accidentally recorded it too. Like I said, the problem with imaginary monsters is that they are really hard to find.

So now they are just "right wing" thugs? Seem to be changing your tune. Is that because despite frantically searching for evidence of far right and nazi saluters you can only find pro hamas protestors doing so? Oh dear. The trouble with imaginary monsters is that they are really hard to find.