James105

I would bet large sums of money that Starmer is practically salivating at the prospect of bringing them into the UK as well, and has already had discussions about this.

This is the person labour sent to "negotiate" who would not look out of place super glued to the road in a just stop oil protest. She is taking credit for "amazing" negotiation skills which involved giving them exactly what they asked for without asking for any improvements to their archaic working practices. So to push the button to make the train go and pushing another button to make the train stop is now a £70K per year job. A 5 year old could and would have done better.

I don't understand why there isn't universal compliance when encountering the police in America as they all carry guns. Also, since the citizens are allowed to carry guns this makes every interaction a police officer faces potentially a deadly one, which means their hands are going to always be on their guns until they know they are safe. Every time I see one of these stories I'm left scratching my head as to why the individual that was shot didn't just comply with their requests.

Home office getting ahead of themselves here by calling arrested people "criminals" before they have even had a chance to plea their case. How are people going to get a fair trial when being judged by the home office as criminals before they have had their day in court? Has there been a change in law to allow them to do this? Didn't Tommy Robinson get sent to jail for potentially prejudicing upcoming trials for doing similar?

You didn't read the report did you? If you agree with this then you would be agreeing that every single person that attends a pro hamas hate march being imprisoned (regardless of their own actions) when some of them start being violent for simply being there.

It's the fact that instead of investigating why these crimes might be on the increase they treat the symptoms (e.g suggesting women should have their own carriages). Has anything changed culturally in the UK over the last several years that would cause Englishmen to suddenly start assaulting women on trains, when there is no history of them doing this in the preceding century? There is no indication in the report I linked so I guess it is just a mystery...

Judge Linford should be removed from his post. Any normal person would suggest that anyone not involved in rioting was not involved in rioting, they were involved in a protest. It was the opposite of a challenging decision. The court of appeal are going to be busy bees in future as some (most) of these sentences are insane. The demand for "far right" does not come close to meeting the supply so they are locking up innocent people who have the legal right to protest without engaging in violence. If any of these judges were have been found to have been "carried away" removing peoples liberty they should face equivalent punishment. What a way to "thank someone for their service".

Ok here is a clue. It's not the "far right".

They wouldn't even allow the use of dental checks to verify if someone who was pretending to be a child was actually a child. https://dentistry.co.uk/2022/03/10/government-defeated-on-dental-age-checks-for-asylum-seekers/ How do you even manage to breath with your head planted so firmly in the sand?

Well...

How? If someone has thrown away their passport and will not tell you where they are from, then where are you going to deport that person to?

Isn't this the same person who has just given £10bn worth of inflation busting pay rises to the public sector despite their productivity being nearly 7% lower than 2019 levels? The clowns in the big top continue to be clowns. Quelle surprise.

That may have been the case in the past, but I do not think that is accurate now.

It's this lack of acknowledgement that there is a problem amongst certain communities (not present in others such as Atheist, Jews, Christians, Pagans, Millwall supporters etc), that come from cultures that treat women/children 'differently' to how women are treated in the west that is making the west a more dangerous place for women. Take the following story about violent crimes against women on public transport which has increased 50% as an example. What do you think the reason for this is if you were to hazard a guess? https://www.itv.com/news/2024-08-14/violent-crimes-against-women-on-britains-trains-jump-by-more-than-50?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1723614464 If the UK is to ever become a cohesive and safe society again the bigotry of low expectations really needs to stop and highly uncomfortable conversations acknowledging the problems need to take place and then potential solutions can be debated fully. Instead of doing this the proposals I am hearing is to give women separate carriages, something that has not been needed since the 1830s.

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

The people have lost respect for the police you say? I just cannot imagine why...

Perhaps because he wasn't PM and wasn't in his control. How do you think government actually works? Based in this comment then I presume you must think a single minister can decide to do something off his own back without any kind of support from anyone else in government. He did the only thing within his power he could do and resigned his position as the government wasn't going as far as he wanted.

Always with the lies. No wonder you didn't post the actual links. Searching 1185 migrants in google does brink up a match....from 4 weeks ago

Factual comment you mean? "And then there was Stephen Parkinson, the director of public prosecutions for England and Wales. He took to social media to warn the populace against sharing news of the country’s riots online. Law enforcement is “scouring” the internet for harmful content, he said. " https://nationalpost.com/opinion/amy-hamm-free-speech-isnt-a-threat-to-the-u-k-censorship-is

You are going to need to back that up. This link says 5000. https://www.gbnews.com/news/migrant-crisis-nearly-5000-cross-channel-small-boats-since-election-labour-keir-starmer

The police are busy scouring the internet for hurty words. Their role has changed so the UK will be more reliant on security guards going forwards.

How would I a link for something "that appears to be"? Just take a look at the news if you need evidence.

According to Robert Jenrick, each illegal immigrant that gets to the UK costs the taxpayer £400,000 on average. So the 5000 illegal immigrants who arrived since Labour took power will cost the taxpayer £2bn - imagine how many nurses and carers that could pay for, and other things the left pretend to care about. Doing nothing to stop them is expensive in comparison to protecting the borders I would think.

Money. There is money to be made from the movement of humans. Contracts for housing them, contracts for feeding them, contracts for imprisoning them when they stab someone. People make money from this and not just the people smuggling gangs. Labour won't stop it either, but their goal appears to be destruction of society as we know it rather than greed.

If cigarettes are more concerning than vaping then why is vaping illegal and cigarette smoking legal then?