James105

Labour MPs can be bought so, so cheaply. It cost YouTube the price of glastonbury tickets to get Labour to ditch the promised 10% digital service tax hike. https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/labour-ditched-digital-service-tax-hike-after-reynolds-enjoyed-a-free-pass-to-glasto-courtesy-of-youtube-383200/ Not just clowns, but corrupt clowns.

History suggests this will end as badly for Europe as it did for Lebanon.

It's not just the telegraph though is it? Labour have lost: 1. The pensioners 2. The working class 3. The leftists Even the likes of Novara media and Owen Jones are anti-Labour now. According to a times YouGov poll 1 in 7 people who voted for Labour regret doing so. His popularity ratings have already sunk lower than Sunak. Those Labour MPs you cite probably want to stay as MPs for longer than a single term and with such a hypocritical, weak, incompetent, lying grifter of a leader who is trashing Labour's reputation and making the UK a global laughing stock, just how long do you think they will put up with this?

Stop excusing the behaviour of murderous scumbag terrorists. Everyone knows what the problem is and appeasing/excusing them will not save you should you encounter one of them on one of their religious murderous rampages as they try and achieve martyrdom. There is only one problematic religion in this world. All the others are actually "religions of peace".

Anyone see a pattern here: "In 2009, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), then led by Sir Keir Starmer, elected not to prosecute Mr Al Fayed following claims he had sexually assaulted a 15-year-old girl in Harrods." https://www.breakingnews.ie/world/al-fayed-billionaire-whose-alleged-abuse-has-been-under-spotlight-for-years-1674336.html He was a useless in his role in the CPS as he is as PM.

Does pensioner harmer Starmer have different security to previous PMs? Sunak had no security issues when he went to watch football in the stands with the normal folks whilst he was PM: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-12080333/Prime-Minister-Rishi-Sunak-pictured-stands-St-Marys-stadium.html Considering the cost of a box at Arsenal is about £9000 per game the benefits in kind tax will at least cost him a lot. He does pay benefits in kind tax on this like anyone else would, doesn't he?

The clown is a full on grifter: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/sep/18/keir-starmer-100000-in-tickets-and-gifts-more-than-any-other-recent-party-leader £100,000 of free gifts and he takes away the winter fuel allowance from vulnerable pensioners who needed that £300 just to heat their homes and not die of the cold this winter.

They were imprisoned for hurty words. They confessed to making hurty word posts. It doesn't matter what mental gymnastics you put yourself through it is undeniable that they typed some hurty words into facebook and were jailed for it. I think where you are getting yourself turned in knots is that you are expecting to see 'hurty words' in the legislation as though this is a formal term rather than just a colloquialism for Section 127 of the Communications act.

sending a grossly offensive message = hurty words breach of Section 127 of the Communications Act = hurty words They posted hurty words and were jailed for it. They didn't have category A images of 7 year olds on their phones. They didn't physically assault anyone. It's literally hurty words they were jailed for.

Yes, they have. This guy posted some memes. https://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/24513379.sellafield-worker-jailed-sharing-offensive-facebook-posts/ This one posted emojis: https://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/24506682.maryport-man-jailed-facebook-post-police-bid-stop-disorder/ Perhaps you can enlighten everyone why these characters deserved a harsher punishment than a pedophile who had "category A" images (the most extreme kind) of children as young as 7 on his phone.

Her father would have been a terrorist which is the only explanation for why she would have had a terrorist issued pager. Maybe now he has lost his daughter he will reflect on his poor life choices that led to this and change his ways.

Maybe the innocent bystanders will take the FAFO lesson they have received and decide terrorism is a silly game to play.

So just to be clear, he didn't actually do anything then and approximately ZERO gays had to flee to Canada in the same way that hundreds or thousands of gays have to flee to Isreal from Palestine? So in Trumps America gays can still get married even though he was President for 4 years and didn't actually do anything to take away their rights? You're saying this is equivalent to Palestine? If that is the case it's an easy $1m dollars! When are you going to organise the pride parade?

That would be fine if he didn't make such a big song and dance out of it when others broke the rules whilst he was in opposition. The fact he did so makes him a massive hypocrite.

The tories presided over mass uncontrolled and mass illegal immigration despite being elected on a promise to reduce and control immigration. The tories are no longer in power as they did the exact opposite of what people voted them into power to do. If they had controlled immigration and stopped illegal immigration they would be in power today, and reform/Farage would be irrelevant. Those who get elected on false promises have no morals, as we are seeing from Labour today as they demonstrate unparalleled incompetence and hypocrisy. They will serve a single term and be replaced by a Tory/reform coalition I should think unless they follow Europe and start to tackle the uncontrolled legal and illegal immigration problem.

Has anyone checked on Jeremy Corbyn to see if he is okay?

Socialist doing what socialists do shocker. "Those with the broadest shoulders will have to pay" he says, whilst paying for nothing himself even though he is a multi millionaire and removing the winter fuel allowance from vulnerable pensioners. Maybe 5 years of this will wake people up to the fact that whilst socialism sounds good on paper to the young and naive, it destroys lives, wrecks economies and kills millions. Hopefully this will put it to bed for another generation once this 5 years is up.

2 tier policing didn't just start under the clown Starmer. It's been going on for decades. The police were complicit in the rape of children, even arresting the children and fathers of the children instead of the rapists. The chief constable at the centre of this didn't go to jail, he retired in 2016 on a £2m pension. I don't recall seeing any of the police complicit in these rapes going to jail either, but I do recall Tommy Robinson going to jail for contempt of court for reporting on it. Leftists to this day continue to be more outraged about Tommy Robinson for speaking out about these child rapists, than the fact that men from a certain culture were raping children and the police let them do it with impunity.

Honestly, the people supporting this never ending war just sound like proles from 1984 to me at this point, pontificating about something where the only knowledge they have is the propaganda they are fed from the media. It's tiresome. The west is enabling this war by funding it. The sooner this stops the sooner the war ends.

How long is too long for you for this to go on for? Another 5 years? 10 years? 20 years? Forever? Do you want UK and US troops to be involved? Maybe a nuclear bomb or 2? How much money do you think is too much? another $100bn? $1tn? $10tn? If you don't want this to continue forever what do you suggest to stop it? I don't particularly care if someone is considered a 'winner' as I am not a child and think there are better things to do with these resources. Unless the western military get involved (which would be a ridiculous waste of life and money) then it will be a forever stand off. Yes some lines might get redrawn and some people will have to swap one corrupt leader for another but at least they will live. My suggestion to save lives and stop wasting money is to stop funding it. What is yours?

If your goal is a forever war then that is an excellent approach to take. Both Ukraine and Russia are corrupt. The media spreads propaganda suggesting this is good vs evil but I doubt that is even close to being true. What is accurate is there are no winners in war other than the arms manufacturers and those who help themselves to the money being used to fund it. The losers are: 1. Russian people. 2. Ukrainian people. 3. The western taxpayers funding this nonsense. The only reason it continues is that the western taxpayer is funding it. Nobody voted to fund this war in the USA or the UK and I should think taxpayers from these countries could think of many, many better things to spend the money on. Remove the funding and Zelenski and Putin will be forced to negotiate.

Jeez these psychopaths are determined to escalate this into something bigger. How about being radical and seeking de-escalation and peace negotiations instead of keeping the war going.

They haven't enacted it yet. Hungary was fined 200m euros and a 1m euro fine a day for not allowing cultural enrichment into their country. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clww729180po So erm... being a member of the EU will cost them, but it is an absolute bargain in comparison to how much illegal immigrants cost a country both financially and socially.

Assumed based on his performance thus far, yes. He didn't even bother to carry out an impact assessment for the winter fuel allowance and how many old people he will kill prematurely as a result of its removal, nor did he bother to actually confirm the details of the so called "£22bn black hole" as the treasury are still "checking this for accuracy" and won't release details so it is reasonable to assume he didn't bother considering alternatives to this as well. Releasing criminals onto the streets before their sentence is complete to cause mayhem is the kind of behaviour I would expect to see from Joker in a batman movie, not the PM of a democratic country.