placeholder

When I was a little kid, I thought was the height of wit to say I'm rubber you're glue whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you. And once again you've got nothing. Take the case of jippy tone who claimed that immigration was okay as long as it was legal. That was his claim. I pointed out that just because something is legal doesn't make it okay. In this case I was using something called reasoning. Your critique of my reasoning just consisted of insult and empty characterization. No it's him I had logical argument was made by you.name c You never offered any counter argument about why being legal in itself justifies a policy. To date, you've still offered nothing. Apparently, nothing is one thing you've got plenty of. And to your credit, you keep on generously sharing that nothing with the rest of us.

I was on the team with denied that Biden was suffering from dementia. I'm still on that team.

So long as you keep on coming up with comments that are devoid of reasoning or evidence, "you've got nothing" will continue to accurately characterize them.

Instead of applying any kind of logic to address my comment comment you just offer an empty characterization. You've got nothing. And an empty and irrelevant claim about my nationality to boot.

Trollism.

It's not when those organs occupy the place a btain should be.

I'll discuss that with you on the thread about Biden even though I'm not sure of what you're referring to.

Wjat you offered is claims about my comment history. But but no actual evidence to back them up.

Another empty comment.

So, according to your construal, it's actually a kind of conspiracy. Or similar to professional wrestling, but only on a much larger and stupider scale.

Another empty insult from you.

So all you've got is a characterization unbacked by any actual evidence.

Well, are you callling jippytum a leftist? He's the party who claimed that immigration is okay so long as it's legal. I don't believe that just because something is legal, that makes it okay. Do I really have to cite cases where something that was illegal was also morally and ethically wrong?

I attacked and belittled their arguments and claims. I did not make it a practice to attack them personally. I made no claims about the motives for their arguments nor about their personal lives.

In other words you've got nothing except personal comments to back you up.

Wrong about what?

You mean, not remembering how the price of petroleum skyrocketed thanks to OPEC?

Again, another personal comment. If it were possible to have less than nothing, you would have it.

Trump did something far more amazing. He didn't choose his "sugar daddy", he chose his "biological daddy.

Proof of your lack of initiative is that you didn't have a father to leave you half a billion dollars. I hope you're properly ashamed.

If that's the case, then he's got very few correct beliefs.

A sure sign of intellectual vacuity is resorting to personal comments. You've got nothing.

I'm sure your comment means something to you. But to those of us dwelling outside of your mind, not so much.

Just because it's legal, that makes it good? So if something is legal therefore it's good? In that case why bother to change laws at all?

He inherited half a billion dollars from his father and trashed the business his father left to him. He epeatedly got outnegotiated to pay too much for businesses he required. He took on too much debt to acquire those businesses and they went bankrupt. As for the rest of your nonsense, it's just personal attacks. You've got nothing.