placeholder

Your question clearly establishes how fact-proof is the new bubble you inhabit. There's a saying that attorneys in a court shouldn't ask questions they don't know already the answer to. Because it's very embarrassing. Maybe you're embarrassment-proof? Here's something from the Marxists at Fox News: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-investigation-ag-garland-taking-hands-off-approach-leaves-charging-decisions-weiss And from the Maoists at the Washington Times: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/mar/1/merrick-garland-says-delaware-us-attorney-david-we/ And here's a bit of general informatIon: "On February 15, 2018, his nomination to be the United States Attorney was confirmed by voice vote. He was sworn in on February 22, 2018. Weiss has been in charge of the investigations into the financial dealings of Hunter Biden and was asked to stay on during the Biden administration.[4]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_C._Weiss#:~:text=He currently serves as the,Attorney from 2009 to 2011. And now that I've complied with your request, I am confident that you will do the honorable thing and comply with mine, I await your response with eagerness. EDIT: Well, it looks like 2009 has fled the scene. What a crucifix is to a vampire, facts are to Trump supporters.

Because it's an uninformed question based on a misconception. And it's compounded by the fact that we're in a thread that was based on a misleading premise.. Instead of asking us to inform you about the concept, why not look it up for yourself? Via a thing called google. or maybe GPIChat...

And there would just as good or as little a reason to raise a similar question if the indictments had occurred before Trump kicked off his campaign viz... "Is it a genuine coincidence that these charges have come a few days before Trump begins his election campaign? .Were these charges advanced to spoil the official launching? (Advising me to drink "Kool -aid" isn't an acceptable reply)"

The sad thing is, I can't tell whether or not thaibeachlovers is making a joke.

Well, then we agree.

There's a difference between an inadvertent error and a deliberate one.

Can you please share with us the evidence of hundreds of crimes. In fact, there's nothing in that laptop tha is sufficient evidence of any crime But hundreds? Stop making things up.

You're the one who claimed that his being released to a halfway house established his innocence. That the court believed it. There is nothing in Chanseley's incarceration treatment that was unusual or that justifies your assertion.. As the comments in the article you cited made clear. You are the one making things up.

An emergency situation that turned out to be mostly a false alarm led a lot of schools in Los Angeles to install air filters, and something strange happened: Test scores went up. By a lot. And the gains were sustained in the subsequent year rather than fading away. https://www.vox.com/2020/1/8/21051869/indoor-air-pollution-student-achievement

I'm assuming that you are referring to the burisma "scandal". As has been repeatedly proven, Joe Biden was acting on the instructions of none other than the president of the United States and the state department in pushing for the removal of a corrupt prosecutor who later claimed that he was pursuing burisma. His own staff says that was a lie. In fact, he wasn't going after any of the oligarchs including the owners of burisma.

If he flipped. A New York Times appears to say that he hasn't flipped. For one thing, even though Weisselberg switched lawyers, the Trump Organization is still paying for them. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/30/nyregion/allen-weisselberg-trump-hush-money.html

To date, there is no good evidence that Biden committed a crime. As for Hunter Biden, are you referring to the former non President and current non ex-President?

I agree. You would imagine that. Such a fertile imagination. Fertile because it's fed by...fertilizer.

If it was determined by the legal system that he had been wrongfully imprisoned, then his sentence would have been vacated. Instead, he was sent to a halfway house.

FBI and Secret Service collusion? Didn't the Durham investigation completely fail at proving collusion at the FBI in regards to investigations of Trump? Despite his obviously being highly motivated to find it. As was his backer, William Barr.

Some? And if they were just idiotic that would be bad enough. But apparently it's not newsworthy when the President publishes his own words via the internet. Don't you just hate it when THE MEDIA slanders and libels Trump by quoting his own tweets? Oh, I guess now it's "truths".So unfair!

First, here is a record of how much costs have declined Today, solar panels are 94% cheaper than they were in 1989. As the production and energy-generating capacity of solar panels has improved over the last few decades, the cost has dropped significantly. This is a quintessential example of economies of scale in manufacturing. Dating back even further to the mid-1970s, every time the global cumulative capacity of photovoltaic cells doubled, prices saw the same relative decline, according to cost and capacity data analyzed by Our World in Data. https://www.rocketsolar.com/learn/energy-efficiency/how-cost-solar-panels-has-fallen In a way, it's true but only because the cost per kwh is already exceedingly close to zero. Less than 50 cents per kwh. And you seem to be making the assumption that the only kind of PVs are silicon based. Other non-silicon based technologies are being developed such as perovskites that can be sprayed on a window at a further reduction in cost.

The Obama Administration did send military aid to Ukraine. But not weaponry. And I see you have no answer your claim that Obama "allowed" Russia to enter Ukraine. And yes Obama should have gone ahead with the missile program.

Are you saying that the Left wing media is authoring Trump's tweets? No wonder they so frequently sounded insane. No genuinely rationaly person could ever compose such lunacy. Shame on those lefties!

What do you mean by allow? Do you think American forces should have entered the fray? Yes, Obama could have done more. On the other hand, he didn't illegally refuse for months to send arms to Ukraine that were authorized by legislation. It was only after extreme bipartisan Congressional pressure and a request from Trump to investigate Hunter Biden and his likely political opponent, Joe Biden. And Obama certainly never said, unlike Trump, that he would considering recognizing Russia's annexation of Crimea. Such actions and comments on Trump's part must have left Putin shaking in his boots.

You seem to specialize in making generalizations that while they can't be prove false, are innately trivial. Given that there are hundreds of millions of Americans it's virtually a certainty that Republican presidents have been called Hitler. And I'm sure that by the same light, every Democratic President has been called Stalin or Mao or something similar. What's your point? And of course Biden has been making gaffes since he was young. Maybe you think slips of the tongue or occasional forgetting are a way of evaluating a President's grasp on policy. In fact, it's Republicans who focus on the slip-ups and not the speeches in their entirety. His talks are certainly a lot more rational and more factual than another ex-President I could name. In fact, aides to a previous president were frequently shocked by how ignorant he was and persisted in being so. And,as far as I know though, there's only been one major President who repeats the same lies and the same vicious insults over and over again. He even led the bizarre movement that questioned whether or not a previous President was native born. No, I'm just kidding about that. Because that would be unbelievable, right?

From the same article: "Presently, we are experiencing an abnormally long interglacial called the Holocene that has lasted nearly 11,000 years. A new glaciation has been expected to begin; however, due to human induced climate change or anthropogenic climate change, the next glaciation is being delayed anywhere from a few thousand to hundreds of thousands of years. Therefore, it is expected that the Holocene interglacial may last at least another 150,000 years.[6]" https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Glacial_and_interglacial_periods

Putin was behaving himself? He continued funding the civil in Ukraine.. While Trump for months illegally refused to provide armaments to Ukraine to battle Putin and the separatists. Did Kim stop developing nuclear weapons while Trump was President? Despite what history shows us. there are still lots of folks who believe that the USA has the power to control the actions of other nations. And if somehow some adverse event occurs, it's because of some failure on the part of whoever the current President happens to be.

I offered the results of a study by someone who actually researched the scientific literature to see what was being said about climate change back then. You offer your recollections. It's absolutely clear that a rational, objective observer would go with actual confirmable evidence. Except to those under the sway of a strong bias.

So far, none of Musk's fanboys here have protested his censorship of MTG. Double standards much?