placeholder

And, of course what makes all these claims truly nuts is that Biden is pushing very hard against the Chinese. Far harder than any President since China opened up to the world. So hard that China is invoking the possibility of war. And yet Biden is not afraid of being blackmailed?

Show us where Biden received payment from the CCP.

Comer's claim that he has evidence means nothing until he actually provides the evidence. What's more, I don't see any claim that Joe Biden was involved. Among rational people, It's not a crime to be related to a son or brother. Or do you believe that's a matter of choice?

Thanks for proving to us that you don't understand the meaning of the word "almost". But even if Biden hadn't said "almost" re you seriously claiming that a state law can only be judged sinful if it violates a specific Biblical precept? Like allowing stores to open on the Sabbath?

Much has been made about the fact that a bank or banks have filed Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) on transactions with Hunter Biden and others. While the name of the report sounds incriminating, most of those reports never amount to anything How many SARs would a large bank file in a year? A BPI study found that, in 2017, a sample of the largest banks reviewed approximately 16 million alerts, filed over 640,000 SARs, and received feedback from law enforcement on a median of 4% of those SARs. Ultimately, this means that 90-95% of the individuals that banks report on were likely innocent. https://bpi.com/the-truth-about-suspicious-activity-reports/ If anyone cares to read the report from which this information was derived, here's a link to that: https://bpi.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/BPI_AML_Sanctions_Study_vF.pdf

More lunacy. Apart from MAGA diehards, virtually no one in the legal community believes that Pence had the legal authority to send the election count back to the states to decide.

For what it's worth, I have actually linked and quoted that article. I specifically cited that "emphatic no" To date, none of the usual suspects here on aseannow.com have acknowledged this.

Do you believe that Fox is somehow going to get "removed" If not, why raise the issue. On the other hand, "if every newsstation or station got sued"...to have a good chance of succeeding, the evidence in those cases would have to be as strong against them as it is against Fox News.

There are peace talks?

You have to keep in mind that MAGA members live in oppositeworld. So to them, an "emphatic no" means a "resounding yes".

Well, if Stephen Miller says so... You've got to be kidding. And what exactly does "CCP connected" mean. Is it like a 6 degrees of separation thing?

Chomper Higgot beat you to it. But thanks, anyway.

Deflecting much? You've got nothing.

Let's see how many banks crash due to Trump's undoing much of the Dodd Frank law.

In the USA there's no such thing as being licensed as an entertainment channel or a news channel or any kind of channel. Maybe it's the case elsewhere.

There's also this which reveals the ethical standards of several of those involved in the study: Correction: Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for COVID-19: A Citywide, Prospective, Observational Study of 223,128 Subjects Using Propensity Score Matching It has come to the attention of the journal that several authors failed to disclose all relevant conflicts of interest when submitting this article. As a result, Cureus is issuing the following erratum and updating the relevant conflict of interest disclosures to ensure these conflicts of interest are properly described as recommended by the ICMJ: https://europepmc.org/article/med/35371877 Among the authors cited was Pierre Kory probably the preeminent ivermection supporter and a notable lowlife.

The hypocrisy of Frank is really not significant compared to the actions of Trump and the Republican Congress.

Resorting to conspiracy theories is a sure-fire indicator of intellectual bankruptcy.

There's a famous line from Walt Whitman "I contain multitudes" I don't think he believed it literally. Apparently, you do. Clearly you haven't a clue as to how clinical studies work.

As numerous legal experts have pointed out, Dominion has an exceptionally strong case. Legal experts say Fox News on shaky legal ground in Dominion lawsuit Dominion argues the vignettes contained in its court filings demonstrate how top hosts and executives at Fox knew the claims being pushed by Trump’s associates about Dominion were false but aired them anyway. “One just doesn’t see cases like this in defamation,” said Catherine Ross, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University who specializes in First Amendment issues. “Fox does not appear to have any plausible defense, particularly in light of what Dominion uncovered in discovery of real-time knowledge of falsity,” she said. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3881278-legal-experts-say-fox-news-on-shaky-legal-ground-in-dominion-lawsuit/

Here's hoping.

Actually I was partly wrong. Such a judgement would put probably put Fox in the red, but not seriously. There is a bigger lawsuit that's asking for 2.7 billion. Even that wouldn't put Fox under but it would definitely hurt a lot.

Given that doctors run the risk of life imprisonment if convicted of performing an illegal abortion, they really can't be blamed for their reluctance to do so when guidelines are so unclear. And then there's the issue of bounty hunters: Texas has authorized private citizens to look for infractions of the law and sue.

Actually, even Duterte ultimately repented of his stance on China. Duterte’s Dalliance With China Is Over The mercurial leader has realigned Manila with Washington as tensions rise in Asia. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/11/02/duterte-china-philippines-united-states-defense-military-geopolitics/ It was the one policy of his that was always unpopular with the Filipino people. Given that China continues to commit aggression against the territorial waters,islands, and people of the Philippines, there isn't much chance that Duterte's China rapprochement will be revived.

Even a judgement of 1.6 billion won't result in bankruptcy. Or even put Fox in the red for the year.