placeholder

https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/datasets.html

And did that research ever proceed to ivermectin being used as a treatment for pseudorabies? Most pharmaceutiicals that do well in vitro don't succeed in actual trials. So this is proof of nothing. It's the same kind of nonsense that claims that because ivermectin worked in vitro against the covid virus, albeit at much much higher concentrations that are normally administered to humans and other mammals, that is proof that it will work clinically. As for your not soliciting my comments...do you understand that this is an open forum? Do you understand what the means?

Actually, your comment gave me the idea to go look at a few sample test reports. None of them mentioned time. Only the date the test was taken So if that's the case, it shouldn't be a problem. Anyway, thanks. Possibly you were wrong about the time issue, but without your line of thinking, I wouldn't have thought even to look for a sample. In my case I'm leaving 3 days after the test but more than 72 hours. So I think it will be fine.

Thanks.

As I understand it, Thailand specifies 72 hours between PCR test and boarding. Are they strict about that. It can take 3 days and possibly a bit over 72 hours to get test results.( I know the CDC rule is 3 days with the express reason for that to allow more than 72 hours.} Anybody know if 3 days is okay even if it runs over 72 hours?

Ringworm treated with Ivermectin? Really? Despite its name, ringworm is not medically considered to be a parasite. It's a fungal infection.The "worm" in the name is from an obsolete use of "worm" to mean disease. And it's transmitted by contact not through wounds. What viral diseases is ivermectin indicated for?

I went on the Thaivisa visa etc forum and that's what Ubonjoe said. Ubonoe may be the world's leading expert on Thailand's visa rules. Sheryl confirmed it. And then a very knowledgeable person who is not a member of the forum confirmed it as well. I hope they're wrong. But i would double check it. You might want to go to that forum or contact Ubonjoe. True or false, I'm sure he would appreciate the update.

But the insurance has to last as long as your visa does. So if you're in thailand with a retirement visa and it expires sep 22, 2022, your covid insurance is going to have to cover that entire length of time.

Any chance that even though you don't have covid, the vaccine will help? Fingers crossed.

In a bizarre kind of way, GreasyFngers makes half of a good point. Pravda shouldn't trust any anonymous posters. Instead the OP should look at the analyses by scientists, particularly medical statisticians, of the raw data that has been collected by VAERS and similar systems. Of course, the difference between folks like GreasyFingers and some of us, is that we recommend looking at what GreasyFingers calls "Government and toady media" and what we call "science".

Mix-and-match COVID vaccines trigger potent immune response Preliminary results from a trial of more than 600 people are the first to show the benefits of combining different vaccines. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01359-3 Five things to know about: Mixing and matching coronavirus vaccines https://ec.europa.eu/research-and-innovation/en/horizon-magazine/five-things-know-about-mixing-and-matching-coronavirus-vaccines

What don't you understand about an official FDA press release that says the pfizer vaccine is now fully approved for people 16 and older?

Thanks for your generous grant of time. After some investigation, It looks like not only did we get it wrong about full FDA approval, but so did the FDA: "Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals." https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine I do grant you that I wrote the full approval was for 18 years and up, but it turns out it's for 16 years and up. Anyway, thanks for correcting us and the FDA. You might want to drop them a note informing them that they are mistaken. As for boosters: "Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration amended the emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to allow for use of a single booster dose, to be administered at least six months after completion of the primary series in: individuals 65 years of age and older; individuals 18 through 64 years of age at high risk of severe COVID-19; and individuals 18 through 64 years of age whose frequent institutional or occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 puts them at high risk of serious complications of COVID-19 including severe COVID-19." https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-authorizes-booster-dose-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-certain-populations Once again thanks for the corrections. Be sure to get on the FDA about this as well and save them from persisting in error. I just hope that in the future the FDA will send you proposed versions of its press releases before they go ahead with releasing them and foolishly contradicting you.

Because for whatever the reasons are that lie in the past, it needs all the vaccines it can get now.

Yours is not a great example of clear thinking. On the one hand, you claim that governments should promote healthful living. And from that observation, somehow you segue to the fact that people who support the government restrictions believed in the Chao Phraya scheme. Maybe an overdose of sunshine explains your post?

Facts, shmacts.

Well, it's male 12-15 year olds. Not all 15 year olds. And it's you who contradicted others who pointed out that vaccination requirements in general were a thing for children to attend school. And if you're referring to the US FDA, in fact it has approved boosters 1)For people aged 65 or older. 2)People aged 18-64 at high risk for severe covid-19. 3)And those in institutional or occupational situations that put them at high risk of coming down with severe complications of covid-19 including severe covid-19. And as for predictions, they're about events that may happen in the future. Difficult to know about that with certainty, unless, of course, you're a time traveler. As for your contention that "we have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines", the Pfizer- Biontech is no longer an EUA vaccine for those aged 18 or older.

To be more precise, the question actually should be where do you pull your information from? Stop spreading falsehoods. https://ourworldindata.org/childhood-vaccination-policies

they deleted it because you didn't include a link to the source.

Here's a quote from the article you linked to: "The only reason the number of vaccinated people is higher is because more people have been vaccinated. For example in unvaccinated people over the age of 50, 6.5% of cases resulted in death compared to 2% of fully vaccinated over-50-year-olds." What your simplistic approach doesn't take into account is not only that most people have been double vaccinated, but the age breakdown of those who have been vaccinated. The younger someone is, the less likely they are to have been vaccinated. So the valid comparison would compare how, in a specific age range, the unvaccinated fare compared to the vaccinated. The ONS analysis found that after adjusting for age, the mortality rate from Covid-19 among fully vaccinated individuals in the week ended July 2 was 0.2 per 100,000 people, an eighth of the rate among the unvaccinated. Age-standardized mortality rates allow statisticians to exclude the possibility that differences in age between vaccinated and unvaccinated people explain discrepancies in death rates between the two groups. https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-study-in-england-shows-few-deaths-among-vaccinated-11631549453

Similar lifestyles. Diet, exercise etc..

And not just that. But about symptoms that pop up months afterwards. That's far different than symptoms appearing within 48 hours of the injection. If those 2 relatives did experience such symptoms, it makes a lot more sense to look at possible similarities in the way they live or genetics, rather than looking for a connection to vaccination.

And questioning the validity of comments and questions is not allowed because to some people's way of thinking, that equates to hostility?

And you think that you are going to get useful information or corroboration from a website where the contributors are anonymous? Links like the one offered by Chomper Higgot above actually are authoritative and obviously lead to the kind of websites that actually will offer reassurance or, perhaps, in the case of some symptoms, not. But looking for that here makes no sense at all.

What possible use is it to raise this issue in this forum? There are scads of medical statisticians combing VAERS and similar raw data aggregates and looking for unusual frequencies of various symptoms. Given that there are lots of people with an agenda to undermine confidence in the vaccine and given that they are anonymous, this seems like an oppurtunity for them to participate.