Danderman123

From the link: 2019 3.7% (Trump) 2022-23: 3.6% (Biden) It looks like your Internet friends gave you the link, but you never actually looked at it.

You're repeating the same opinion piece by a convict who intentionally disclosed national security classified information. Shampoo, rinse, repeat. Do you believe that Joe Biden stole the 2020 election from Donald Trump?

That's not an argument, that's a fact.

That's an easy one, the writer intentionally disclosed classified information. That's about a 100% shot at being indicted. Biden's staff inadvertently mixed in a handful of classified documents in with other official papers. When discovered, the classified documents were immediately returned. There's about a 100% chance of *not* being indicted in that circumstances. At this point, the issue on the table is your grip on reality. This is a very well understood area of criminal investigation, with plenty of precedent. You can recognize reality, or, do what a lot of crazy people do, which is ignore data that doesn't fit into your worldview. Let's see how you react.

Are you talking about a handful of doctors, or thousands?

If Biden has dementia, but can appear normal if provided drugs, how can other people with dementia obtain the same drugs?

Could you list the criminal statutes that Biden has violated?

How many doctors do you think participated in the COVID "scam"?

You love your conspiracy theories. How many doctors do you believe were in on the conspiracy to fool everyone about COVID?

I guess you think that Biden will be barely hanging in there during the debate.

You don't understand that the scientific consensus is that human produced pollutants are warming the planet.

Cluster bombs are used to attack airfields. In this case, a HIMARS shell was deflected by the Russians and landed on a beach But, you knew that already.

You misread. Your linked paper stated that human caused climate change is real. Do you disagree?

From your link: "we emphasize explicitly and unequivocally that human-caused climate change is real, that it poses significant risks to society and the environment, and that various policy responses in the form of mitigation and adaptation are necessary and make good sense." Do you agree?

You are clearly not well educated in the sciences. However, the proposed carbon tax may well be a scam.

Says the guy who has made 1,000s of posts about Ukraine, and close to zero about Sudan, Congo or Burma.

If the Trump fans here tell us after the debate that Biden was on drugs, two things are certain: Biden won the debate, and Biden will win the election.

Biden is too tough on Immigration for you.

Trump couldn't fill the arena at Temple University. He is going to get slaughtered in Philadelphia in November. Joe Biden has taken Pennsylvania in 3 national elections, it's a lock for him in November.

From your link: "In cooperation with internet censorship in China, Sina sets strict controls over the posts on its services. Posts with links using some URL shortening services (including Google's goo.gl), or containing blacklisted keywords, are not allowed on Sina Weibo. Posts on politically sensitive topics are deleted after manual checking. Users with few followers may be able to post on censored topics with relative freedom until they reach a critical mass of followers, which triggers enforced content supervision." In other words, you are wrong.

Drones are not artillery shells.

Reports are that the Vovchansk pocket still exists, but the front lines are receding from it. The longer the trapped Russian soldiers hold out, the farther away the front lines will move. The Russians are building a defensive line near the border, on the Ukrainian side. I suspect that in a month or so, that will be the front line. The Russians will have accomplished creation of a border defense that will stop incursions into Belgorod region.

Do you have any information on these North Korea drones being used in Ukraine?

You seem new to this election thing. First off, the situation in June will be totally different in November, so citing your perception of the environment today is pointless. Secondly, you ignore other factors in the election, such as the Senate race, the state campaign organizations, and voter registration. For what it's worth, current polling does not agree with you: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/minnesota/

He came out for fundraisers. Do you seriously believe that Trump will be competitive in California?