Danderman123

There is a topic here about people who believe Trump's lies. Perfect for you.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/donald-trump-latest-hillary-clinton-lock-her-up-we-dont-care-us-elections-campaign-promise-a7467071.html Donald Trump has told supporters that his pledge to “lock up” Hillary Clinton had "played well" ahead of the US election but he now doesn't care about it. It was a "pledge", not hyperbole, per Trump.

Are you saying that Trump was lying when he said he would put Hillary Clinton in jail?

But you are personally unaware if any of the 91 charges against Trump are false. Right?

What you are saying is that you personally are unaware of anything false in the 91 charges against Trump (because you haven't seen the discovery material yet).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/06/16/theyre-rapists-presidents-trump-campaign-launch-speech-two-years-later-annotated/ "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."

Let me ask you a simple question: Do you think that Ruby Freeman and Wandrea "Shaye" Moss committed election fraud, as Trump alleged? Yes or no?

That's not what is in the telephone call recording - that's what your internet friends have told you he said. "I just need you to find me 11,000 more votes" is pretty explicit, especially when he said "there could be serious consequences if you don't".

If you can see this now, why didn't Trump see this long ago, and return the Classified documents immediately. You know, keep his nose clean once out of power. Why tempt the FBI by holding onto classified documents?

Trump had boxes and boxes of top secret classified documents. Hillary was sent and responded to long email chains that had some emails with classified markings on them. These emails were largely schedules, and draft press releases. See the difference?

Hundreds of pages of indictments are a pretty decent affirmation. There are no real denials, just mumblings about weaponization.

Weren't you saying "Lock her up" in 2016? If not, were you complaining when Trump said it?

Please advise which of the 91 charges against Trump are false. Let me remind you of an old legal maxim: "When the facts are against you, argue the law. When the law is against you, argue the facts. When the law AND the facts are against you, talk about random stuff like lawfare and weaponization". So you can't argue the law or the facts, apparently.

One major difference: Biden was elected. Also, Trump committed crimes. Although you apparently feel that Trump is above the law.

Would you advocate prosecuting Trump if you thought he committed a crime?

Simple answer: 50% of Americans have below average IQ.

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-paul-manafort-russia-campaigns-konstantin-kilimnik-d2fdefdb37077e28eba135e21fce6ebf A Treasury Department statement Thursday offered a potentially significant clue, asserting that Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian and Ukrainian political consultant, had shared sensitive campaign and polling information with Russian intelligence services. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/15/trump-campaign-chief-paul-manafort-employee-kilimnik-gave-russia-election-data.html Manafort’s associate, Konstantin Kilimnik, “also sought to promote the narrative that Ukraine, not Russia, had interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election,” the Treasury Department said as the Biden administration announced new sanctions on Russia, Kilimnik and others. https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-campaign-chief-paul-manafort-owns-up-to-passing-sensitive-data-to-suspected-russian-agent Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign chairman Paul Manafort on Monday publicly admitted that he gave polling data to Konstantin Kilimnik, a suspected Russian intelligence asset. The U.S. Treasury Department says the data—which it described as “sensitive information on polling and campaign strategy”—was then passed to Russian intelligence services. This was common knowledge back during the Mueller investigation.

Do you agree that we will never see Prighozhin again?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/wagner-boss-prigozhins-body-ided-in-morgue-by-missing-finger-report?ref=home?ref=home Wagner Boss Prigozhin’s Body ID’ed in Morgue by Missing Finger: Report

or the Capitol Police Board, apparently.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/21/politics/fact-check-jim-jordan-nancy-pelosi-january-6-security/index.html "The Speaker of the House is not in charge of Capitol security. That’s the responsibility of the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the US Capitol Police and approves requests for National Guard assistance."

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/3787032-dc-national-guard-deployment-wasnt-purposefully-delayed-on-jan-6-final-report-finds/ "President Trump had authority and responsibility to direct deployment of the National Guard in the District of Columbia, but never gave any order to deploy the National Guard on January 6th or on any other day,” the committee wrote in the 845-page report it released Thursday evening. “Nor did he instruct any Federal law enforcement agency to assist."

You are misinformed. Only Trump and the SecDef had authority to call in the National Guard.

The scientific consensus is not important. What is important is the data the consensus is based on. You can't argue with the data, which is an implicit endorsement of the Global Warming hypothesis.

They are going their separate ways.