stevenl

Trump will ignore the SC on his deportations. That's cause for impeachment.

I didn't realize this quote was too difficult for you. Maybe next time find an easier source? It clearly says 'both sides a loser'.

Your linked article didagrees with you. "Those comments look like a mutual recognition that a trade war of attrition is a loser for both countries."

I don't think it's an anti China stance for many. It's a pro trump stance, who does the right thing all the time. Threatening tariffs is good, cancelling tariff threats is good, implementing tariffs is good, cancelling tariffs is good, implementing tariffs is good, changing tariffs is good.

Finally facts.

How about stop developing new projects?

Ok, so i understand a recession is good. I presume that's why you voted trump, to get a recession.

Thumping their nose at the SC.

Then what is the loony right talking about annexing Canada and Greenland?

Very reasonable question from Bill. Could it be your source is the IDF?

She was not responsible for capitol security. A maga lie.

Same as your banking app. Online banking has vulnerabilities but it's safe.

There will be plenty of people around at the airport to help the old farts. If they're really old farts living here and still traveling, this won't be the only issue they'll encounter.

Great offer, 4 beer cans for 198 baht. I'll extend the offer, anyone wanting to buy 4 cans is welcome.

Did you read your link? "Georgia election officials have been aware of existing vulnerabilities in the state’s voting software for more than two years but continue to insist the system is safe...".

Thanks for confirming the trump administration is thumping it's nose st the supreme court.

Should be easy then to overturn it with a new amendment.

All nothing to do with the administration refusing to adhere to a SC ruling. The court also ruled AP should be admitted to the press conferences again, also there the administration refuses to adhere to the ruling.

The other way round. US should stop policing the world, which they're doing here by using their veto.

'Can not' and 'are not allowed to be ' are not the same.

Why the obsession with maga for lgbtq?

Without a link that's the only way your post should be read. The first link makes the same claim as you do, i disagree with the opinion.

Do they? Which posts show "We have many people from Europe who feel the US needs to continue to defend Europe at a considerable cost to the US taxpayers."

From the link by placeholder, 2023 numbers. These numbers are more in line with my thinking, albeit i'd have guessed a lower production cost. "The iPhone 15 Pro, depending on storage size, costs between $999 and $1499." "The cost of making an iPhone 15 Pro, Apple's latest iPhone, is $558. Components to make a phone include the screen, the phone casing, the camera, the battery, software, chips, and more. Apple charges a sizable markup on its phones."

No, your numbers just seem unlikely. Hence my question.