stevenl

Isn't deportation a standard punishment for working illegally?

11 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I judge others on their posting record, not what they later claim.

 

My view is you constantly present pro-Trump legal arguments.

Others, I am sure, have their own view.

 

I do have other views.

He is posting factual, you're posting opinion mixed with facts. And when he posts an opinion it is clear he's not supporting trump. I'd say moderate democrat, like Biden, but that's speculation.

Lol, 10  years later you find this post in the Phuket forum. I suggest you repost in the Pattaya forum.

53 minutes ago, Tug said:

Why would her personal life put the trial in jeopardy?there is ample evidence to convict trump over the top evidence no brainer evidence guilty dog standing in the middle of the evidence video evidence recording evidence confession by lackey evidence trumps a naughty boy and deserves punishment lock him up!

Not her personal life, but possibly unethical behaviour as DA.

14 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

 

And at the time, Trump was tall, arguably handsome, rich and famous and seemed to be doing okay with the ladies. 

 

Now this has-been writer is getting rich and famous after saying nothing for 30 years. 

So he should have appealed in stead of defaming.

47 minutes ago, Mike Lister said:

We are obliged to not advocate anything that is illegal.

Which is a far cry from my point.

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

All those posters who are not concerned about the legal aspects of passing on their fortunes to their intended beneficiaries should bear in mind that if their wife can bypass the system and persuade the bank to go along with her by dishing out the cash without the authority to do so (only 'probate'/administration gives it that authority) then other third  parties (who were not supposed to be beneficiaries) could also do that and get money that they intended to go to their wives.  It's a two-way street.

So my wife having the pincode, thereby being able to access the account without probate, allows other third parties to do the same?

10 hours ago, Mike Lister said:

Strange!!! What do you suggest we do Steven, recommend to member's that they break the law? How about tax, should we advocate tax evasion also? 

You really see that as the only option?

And again one 

https://tass.com/emergencies/1735087?embed=true

But how can a Greek flagged tanker be there, are they not part of the boycott?

3 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

You can keep telling yourself that, but it won't make it true.

You're right, it won't make it true because it is true.

6 hours ago, impulse said:

She was the beneficiary of the people's money that she arranged to pay him.

 

Big showstopper. 

 

Not only that, it goes to her ethics, and what other ethical tenets she'd be willing to cast aside. Clouds every case she's ever been involved in.

"Not only that, it goes to her ethics, and what other ethical tenets she'd be willing to cast aside. Clouds every case she's ever been involved in."

Way over the top.

Stupid behaviour on her part, whether true or not, that puts this trial in jeopardy.

53 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Why? I know what he said, what I said and what you said. 

 

That you are not able to put it all together does not surprise me. 

I think kindergarten doesn't teach this, but redoing lower primary for some reading lessons would be useful for you.

1 hour ago, lungbing said:

From whom?

Exactly, another poster said he experienced that didn't happen. Conveniently ignored by all claiming 'bank will not release funds'.

5 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

Cmon I was being a wise ass. Point being, just let the kids or old lady have bank pins and simply transfer money out. All I hear here is, it's not legal.

Legal is all one very loud poster here seems to care about. Strange here in Thailand.

37 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

https://apnews.com/united-states-presidential-election-9dfb1e4c381043bab6fd0fa6dece3974

 

So no promise to end fossil fuel any time soon.

From your link

"The activist, 24-year-old Rebecca Beaulieu, later said she appreciated that Biden took her question seriously, but that he was not satisfied with Biden’s plan to eliminate net carbon emissions by 2050."

9 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

No, now you're making things up.

Maybe read my post and your quotes again, slowly this time.

8 hours ago, Hakuna Matata said:

All of them are long stayers in Thailand, on illegal ED visas.

 

First of all, stop selling ED visas to foreigners!

That's right, sell those ED visa to Thai only.

1 hour ago, steven100 said:

welcome to Phuket ladies and gentlemen ....

now if you look on the right hand side you'll see our lovely temple ....

now on the left we have .... oh '  a boxing match between two van drivers  !!  

At the departures.

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

He knows the media will only use it to ridicule him, so IMO he is doing the right thing by not showing up. I remember the time when the moderator was openly biased against him in the 2016 debates.

He won't lose any votes by not going on them.

Nothing at all to do with the media.

He just can't allow himself to be challenged on stage. He only has to lose by debating.