Liverpool Lou

No such weighing service exists, you'll need to do some counting and sorting in order to help yourself. If that is something that you're not prepared to do, take them to a temple and donate them or start spending them in Tops, Lotus's, 7-11, Family Mart. Villa in Bangkok always used to have a notice that small were wanted and they would change (and count) any quantity, Villa Pattaya may sort you out. Alternatively, deposit them in your bank account (there may be a charge for large amounts)...https://www.thephuketnews.com/lots-of-loose-change-50403.php Wherever you go, though, you will not be very welcome if you don't, at least, separate the coin denominations. For future reference, as you'll never normally get more than three or four of the smaller coins in any change (no matter how hard the cashier tries) just keep them in your pocket and use them in the same shops that give them in your change, that way you'll never build up an unwanted PITA collection.

55555! No standard Mazda 3 goes like a bat out of hell.

Huh?

"Shipping mackbook..." Are you sure that it's genuine?

"...shower in the middle of the night?" You've not noticed how hot it has been lately and he had been (presumably) banging the bint in his bed!

Wow man, you're really out-of-touch. Try Google. The case didn't go to court because Fox settled, i.e., admitted they lied and paid off the plaintiff to avoid a long and embarrassing public spectacle. Wow, "man", you're the one who's out of touch. Fox did not admit that they lied and paid off the plaintiff to avoid a long and embarrassing public spectacle.

Party pooper.. I'm glad that I'm appreciated.

"I would bet tucker's audience has an average IQ 1-2 standard deviations left of the mean on the Bell Curve". Clearly you must be part of his audience to have that much (bizarre, false) information.

I guess that you'd be right, definitely more accurate than the false "fired".

That enormously big settlement was an admission of guilt. Actually, it definitely wasn't!...that's just your opinion of something that you know nothing about (unless you're on the FNC board) because it didn't get to court. Don't forget when you're throwing around your "admissions of guilt" that Dominion also accepted not to proceed with the court case!

I thought cancelled was the same as fired! Can you prove with any links as to him not being cancelled or fired please? "I thought cancelled was the same as fired!" Why would you think that? "Can you prove with any links as to him not being cancelled or fired please?" Can you prove with any links as to him being fired please? There's lots of verifiable information about him that's easily available and I'm referring to "firings", not "cancellations", whatever that is. supposed to mean

I would blame the reporters who deliberately titled their article to make it seem they were going to charge 1000 ฿ when they apparently never were going to. This kind of disinformation for profit is a hallmark of our hypercapitalist times in my view. How about blaming those who "read" the copy of the scores of articles and propagated it as fact, none of which reported that the tax was going to be imposed, for the "disinformation"?

Yes, he's done so badly for himself, hasn't he? Incidentally, he was not "fired" from PBS, nor CNN and is still "employed" under his contract with Fox.

So I gathered that you have not stopped watching Fox even after they lose the defamation case for lying and misinformation. No wonder you sound confused. Seems that you're the one who is confused, FNC did not "lose the case for lying and misinformation", it did not even get to court!

Someone has to.

"$20 a year to sit back and do nothing..." He doesn't need it, never mind the $20,000,000 p.a. that was actually mentioned.

"...for lying and misinformation". Huh? Where did you get that gem from, I thought that the case did not get to court?

"...they have more juicy dirt on Carlson than he has on them" Got anything empirical on which to base that story of yours?

Yes, but this was a questionnaire/research about a tentative additional amount.

No, they did not have a change of mind, the only sloppiness was that demonstrated by those posters who misinterpreted (or deliberately misconstrued) the original reports about a questionnaire.

Only those who chose to misrepresent what was actually the case from the beginning.

There was no mind-changing, it was always just an initial questionnaire.

No, it was never anything more than a questionnaire, the RD never said that it was going to be implemented, lots of AN "last-nail-in-the-tourism-coffin-money-grabbing-government" posters, wrongly, assumed it to the case, though.

Indeed but not to transfer funds. Indeed, indeed.

They used to accept faxed instructions from customers to transfer funds.