Liverpool Lou

No, it is not five years minimum, five years is the maximum This was theft by pickpocketing, anyway.

The owner gets them back as they are his property, regardless of the "good faith" of the pawn shop buying non-Thai gold pieces from an LB.

With lots of practice. Ask an LB pickpocket.

It's a warning to those who do not know that many of them operate that way.

"Tranny" is still the correct word, I believe

The picture does not show me that it is illuminated before the accident..... That's why I said pre-smash but neither does it show that it wasn't illuminated.

Because they didn't have an email address for you, perhaps, and it's not a service that is offered?

That's fine, if you use one you know. With win orange taxi bikes you think they are legal and many are not As an entity, the orange-jacketed motorbike taxi service is 100% legal. Some individuals may not be. As an entity, Bolt isn't legal, apparently, so none of the riders/drivers can be.

Even the ones that are regular Win drivers when they're not picking up Bolt customers? Does the required licence cover them whoever they're working for? As the OP stated, Bolt is not licenced/certified/legalised in Thailand. Licenced 'win' riders are.

Here we go. He's off again. Lets hear it then smarty pants? "Let's hear" what?

All the Bolt bikes are illegal.

Not in this case, the accompanying photo clearly shows a large, illuminated (pre-smash) sign.

"...and they would all be like those Soi 6 girls". You mean 700 prostitutes demanding paid-for drinks and money for them to blow you or they wouldn't even talk to you? Yeah, great party.

Is that the one where the girl, herself, tampered with the circuit-breaker causing her own death?

Thailand does not have jury trials, judges decide here but, if it it did, a stupidly biased jury such as you suggest would be ridiculous.

Never mind what anyone here guesses at, what AIS (1175) says when you ask them is what matters and is the only way to know for sure.

Nonsense. https://www.rusaviainsider.com/russia-enhances-continued-airworthiness-system/#:~:text=Transferring such aircraft into the,oversight functions for these aircraft. Why do you think that they have no correct spare parts?

Why must they be lying? Are there any confirmed reports of their Airbus and Boeing aircraft being compromised by being defective in any way or failing to meet international safety standards? Do you really think that airlines do not keep stocks of spares for aircraft on their fleets or do you think that they wait until they need a part, after sanctions have been imposed, and then try to order them one by one?

Some companies' "Unsubscribe" instructions take some time to be activated but until it is effected you don't have to read the emails, you can just delete them from your inbox. You can also block them and report them as spam.

Good idea, could be one of so many in Soi 1!

I don't know which hospital in Sukhumvit Soi 1 you could be referring to, but my personal experience with Bumrungrad and Camillion is that they do their best to work in detail to find out exactly what is going on and treat it as perfectly as possible, to use your words. Unless there is evidence to the contrary, suggestions that they are conning patients shouldn't be made.

Those of us using Wise to receive their pensions (or any other remittances) or retain credit balances of any consequence, because they do not have access to a bank account, should bear in mind that Wise offers no deposit protection. As I understand it, its only regulatory obligation is to hold all of our money in cash and secure liquid assets. I'm not suggesting that our funds deposited in Wise are at risk but we only have Wise's reassurance that it "will look after our money by using safe investments and reputable banks with strong liquidity" for protection. It is worth bearing that in mind for the bankless.

Not strictly true. there have been reports of people using Wise to receive payments and that is not a Bank. You're right, if the DWP does accept Wise details for pension payments, but the distinction that I was making was between bank accounts and credit card accounts into which DWP will not pay pensions.

Why not? There's no law making that location restriction but under-21s are not permitted in those shop by law already.

Safe to assume by meeting the requirements at the time to have a licence issued. Now the shop isn't fulfilling it's reporting obligations.