Liverpool Lou

Why, when the OP specifically states... "he was reported by Immigration for not attending the required education classes for his visa. Chiang Rai Immigration canceled his visa on November 3rd, 2022..."?

Just because there is no extradition treaty in force for Poland does not mean that extradition from Thailand cannot be requested and/or granted.

Interpol does not have the authority to do that.

These reports are relevant because the IB has announced that they were having a crackdown between Dec 1st and today...as the OP clearly states and as has been reported in many other connected threads. These cases are the consequence of that crackdown.

"Student visa" generally refers to an ED visa, it doesn't mean that they're school/university age and 37 is not an unusual age to want to learn something. If he'd attended the classes he was supposed to, even at age 37, he probably wouldn't have had this issue.

No, that wasn't reported anywhere.

How?

Those offences were given as examples, not as the only offences that qualify.

Yeah, at least I only have one. What?

Not to be pedantic but the bank will only return your ATM card to you if it is embossed with your name, many are not, otherwise it is returned to the bank head office which can be a laborious and time consuming process. Absolutely. How can any third party bank identify which card belongs to whom without contacting every bank that has a retained card in it's ATM and investigating? That's something that the banks will not do on the spot. I can't understand why some members claim that banks will just open their ATMs and dish out cards, willy nilly. Banks sometimes issue retain instructions because an account is being misused and they do not want that person to have the card, that's another reason that banks do not generally open ATMs to return retained cards.

Yes, that is actually what happens, not what JackGats suggested is normal, unless he lost his card in an ATM of his own bank and branch where they could check the reason for the card being retained before handing it back. Retained cards are generally destroyed.

Not anymore for retail customers, and Citi, Bangkok, is a Thai bank, as are all banks operating in Thailand.

You're the exception that proves the rule.

That's a state owned Thai bank, what makes you think that it's an "international bank"?!

I have accounts with five different Thai banks and, in 28 years, not one of them have "sucked", shown any evidence of not being trustworthy or have proven to be petty thieves as you libellously label them all.

as I've said a few times already, i used passport and driving licence And, as I've said, it's the requirements that he needed to meet that were being discussed here.

The percentages are debatable, but I would say the percentage of failed businesses here, historically, is a lot higher, by a long way, to those that are successful. Are you suggesting successful businesses, historically, outnumber failed businesses? "I would say the percentage of failed businesses here, historically, is a lot higher, by a long way, to those that are successful". Based on what evidence? "Are you suggesting successful businesses, historically, outnumber failed businesses?" You're the one doing the suggesting with a complete lack of evidence, not me. Are you suggesting that you're right in your assumptions? With nothing to back it up.

Oh my god! Are you not going to ask for example and proof, like a kindergarten child? You know how it is. Big news when a person is fishing in the wrong place, swimming with corals and happens to hit one or collecting already broken and fallen down ones. Ops! fine 100k, no problem. You have an odd idea about the mind of a kintergarten child! 1. None of those were jailed then deported for flashing/urinating. 2. None of them were fined B100k.

Thanks, that's fine, so why do they have the things they put your debit card into? I noticed one at every counter. Maybe they're for credit cards or cards linked to their "Wallet" systems.

7-11s do not accept payment by debit card, they've told me that several times. Several times because I've asked different staff during different shifts the same question.

Not needed for me, i must be special You're right, of course you're special, but we were discussing the requirements that were needed for him.

You are correct ..and the importer has been issued an import licence!

He should have added..."unless an import licence has been issued to the importer".

Because the importers have been issued an import licence!

https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3639027 "Thailand is now preventing travelers from carrying any meat products directly into the country unless an import permit has been obtained".