Mac Mickmanus

No, I cannot see where Trump said "planted", I do see the word planted and that is the words of a reporter , but I don't see the words were Trump claimed that the FBI planted evidence in his Mar le go home . (Your links just take me to the Independents home page ) Please point out where the word "planted" is used by Trump *Mr Trump said: “That (the documents) they (the FBI) put there. It’s a set-up. It’s weaponisation. And it’s inappropriate to do. It’s a bad thing for our country.*

Trump was referring to the documents that the FBI left on the floor . The FBI released an image of documents strewn over Donalds floor . Donald said that it was the FBI who put the documents on the floor and took them from storage . Donald isn't claiming that the FBI planted fake evidence , he is saying the FBI took them out of safe storage and left them on the floor (which they did do)

Once again , that doesn't say that the FBI planted fake evidence in his Mar le go home . The FBI took documents out of safe storage and left documents on the floor in his house and claimed that they documents weren't kept in a secure location

Once again, that doesn't say that Trump accused the FBI of planting evidence/documents . The reported wrote that Trump said it , but Trump didn't actually make the claim that the FBI planted anything . Trump did say he hoped that they wouldn't plant anything. Trump did not say that the FBI planted anything

That doesn't say that Trump accused the FBI of planting documents in the Mar le go , it says he hoped that they wouldn't do it

Will you be posting a link to back that claim up ? Trump never did claim that , he said that he hoped the FBI wouldn't do that , which is very different to Trump saying they planted documents . So, will you be retracting your allegation ?

Now you are calling me a troll ? As its now becoming rather abusive , I will bail out the discussion

I haven't ignored that and I have replied previously to that point It makes ALL the difference whether the documents were classified or not . If the documents were not classified, then Trump has no obligation to hand them over to anyone . If the letters between him and NK Kim were his own personal property , then its no business of the FBI's

Am I missing something ? If Trump has been charged with making false statements saying he handed over all the requested classified documents and he's been charged with obstructing the FBI from doing their work . If its found that there were no classified documents , wouldn't that make Trump not guilty of all charges ?

Can we stick to the subject and leave the personal abuse out of it ? Thanks

Can you provide a link to support that claim ? (BTW , Trumps lawyer stating that she was concerned about the FBI planting evidence is not an accusation by Trump that the FBI planted classified documents ) So, can you back up your claim ? (And BTW again, Trump saying that the FBI put the documents on the floor showing they were not properly kept in a safe environment , isn't showing that Trump claims that the FBI planed the documents . So, can you back up your claim ?

If the documents were declassified , wouldn't that make him not guilty of retaining classified document ?

There are anti rabies vaccinations in every hospital /clinic in Thailand

If Trump did de classify all the documents , wouldn't that make him not guilty to having classified documents ? Sounds like a decent legal defence to me

Trump personally made the claim that he de classified all the documents . Has the tape been verified as it being genuine and does it actually exist ? Is it a genuine tape ar yet another "someone told me about it" report ?

Trumps side is claiming that the seized documents had been declassified and thus didn't need to be handed over

Jared Kushner is Trumps son in law, rather than his "son"

It says in that report that that was claimed by two anonymous people and it hasnt been verified as factual FBI found documents containing classified intel on Iran and China at Mar-a-Lago "say two people familiar with the matter." Two people "familiar with the matter" making an anonymous claim wouldn't stand up as evidence in a Court of law

Yes, I am aware of that as it happen one year ago . I did ask what documents were taken . Personal letters between Don and Kim were taken , but what were the other taken documents ? What info did they contain ?

I didn't claim that was all it was , so I cannot provide links to claims I haven't made .

I have only been viewing from afar and may not be fully informed . Could you tell me what other documents are in question ? What were other other documents taken from the Mar le go ? Were they potentially personal documents or were they highly sensitive documents which could have been used mischievously ?

^ Like come on guys, does it even matter what gender hairdressers are ??????

The claim was that they had returned all the relevant documents and Trump regarded the "love letters" to and from NK Kim to be his personal letters and his own property and the FBI thought otherwise . Let the Court decide who those letters belonged to

How long ago was that ? Must have been 20-30 years ago Haven't had fully naked for at least 15 years now , although if you sat in a certain seat at the old Spotlight go go bar , you could watch the girls getting changed from their normal clothes to their work clothes as the changing room had a sliding door and they never used to close it

You have just posted a video of Trump stumbling !!!!!!!! Now you are claiming not to have reacted !!!!!!!!! The video you posted shows that you did