novacova

They do, there was women a in a village I used to live in that would go outside for a walk drunk and 100% naked after arguing with her husband, she did it several times a year and I’m sure she is still doing it.

How can they take the gloves off when the hands are the gloves? Remove the hands? ????

Idiot advance divers not informing inexperienced recreaters of the dangers of assenting too quickly.

Wife’s family are the main suppliers of fish and buffalo in their area, they call buffalo “beef” and they’re always trying to shove it down my throat “you want eat beef?” “mai phom beef mai di”

Best solution is to book directly from the airlines. May pay a little extra, but it certainly is better than dealing with those online travel agents

Take her to Beijing for a month so she can experience what a disparaging hectic life looks like. She be thrilled to go back home.

Eat buffalo, it’s cheaper and lasts longer in the mouth ????

Outlaw Torn, by Metallica. As loud as possible!????

Only in some states. And sure if one gets caught with a ton of white drugs. But getting caught with an ounce? No one gets life for that nowadays.

Why are you freaking asking me this question?? I’m not a policymaker in any country on this planet.

Okay dear friend, I’m not denying that there is climate change, as stated previously it’s an ongoing system of perpetual change. From this perspective it’s completely irrational to believe climate is a stable steady uniform system. I’m in defiance of what funded research that has bent the cause of it. No so called “scientific papers” or “links” will ever sway this individual, I’ve read it all over the decades and empirically emphatically concluded it’s a politicized gimmick being played out on the masses. The greatest thing about all this is that we are free to think and believe as we wish.

No that’s not what I said. What I implied is that go to Singapore and bring your entitlements from whatever country you’re from and participate in an anti war on drugs campaign by setting up a dope distribution enterprise. Then please inform of the success. Easy enough to decipher now?

Exactly, now you’re catching on. Those measurements cannot be accurately measured. Though depending on who actually funds these research wins the battle of the narrative and the those that fund the research have an agenda. As I said, it’s political warfare and being in the midst of it is full of fog. It’s big money fueling the narrative because it’s a big windfall for those who profit off it. Therefore, empirically one has to deduce with all factors in its entirety. If one is stagnating in a political sphere their prism range will be remain narrow and hopelessly stuck in a mindset. Therefore claiming climate cycles are the result of human activity is utterly ludicrous and politically motivated. Maybe some minor, very minor influence if any, definitely not the cause to incur tornadoes, hurricanes typhoons, major weather occurrences and all the other insane crazy stuff that is cited. This stuff has been going on for eons and eons. So much for the natural history deniers ???? it’s a religion I tell you ????

It’s irrelevant whether humans have a major influence on climate, because it’s a political issue, therefore the human cause defaults to null. Fact: the major influence of climate is the Sun, oceanic volcanoes and large volumes of methane being released. Nothing we can do about it. But if some bleeding hearts want to blame ourselves for nature pushing forward, then fine, have at it. Meanwhile I’m going to go outside willfully and joyfully burn some fossil fuel, just like what the hypocrites do ????????????????

Obviously the above poster is politically bent. Of course natural history in its entirety most certainly cannot be accurately measured as of today and it certainly has shown major events have occurred before any human walked here, if anyone is unable to understand that and claim otherwise has no understanding of natural history. Science is science, it’s research and discovery, not fact. The science of yesteryear is not the science of today and the science of today will certainly evolve more accurately as future progresses, as long as politics are not involved. Politics pollute the facts. If one is politically motivated for a truth, then the truth will never be known to them, it’s just an opinion and idea. Anyone can cite bs in the name of science, it simply doesn’t make it so. Though in this day and age of political toxicity there are major gaps in knowledge and understanding due to political conformity. People just don’t realize how finite our knowledge is, instead they lean the opposite direction and claim full knowledge and understanding, which is the exact opposite direction of where discovery is. That is where your nonsense begins.

It’s the constituent emotional turmoil that each opposition has about the comedy act that is so amusing ????????????

OMfreakingG! This will really get in the crawl of the Trump haters????????????

Natural history has shown us that events of greater magnitude has occurred long before humans existed, and most cannot be accurately measured. Myself and no one here has anything to prove to anyone. Plain and simple.

Really? Good grief already, look at where these come from, 100% political. Exactly. First it was the global warming hysteria. Then measurements showed the Earth was cooling. Well, then they came up with climate change, which is actually more accurate because the climate has been changing for hundreds of thousands of years, millions actually. It’s a variable moving target that those on that side keep playing with about every one of their hysterical narratives the variable targets keep moving, every single one of them. But what this is really about is manipulating the masses, political warfare. One either buys into it and even to the point of an obsession to win for self preservation, or remains calm with an open empirical independent mind. Personally I really don’t care what an individual thinks or accepts, they own it.

It really doesn’t mean much since it’s politically screwed

Ummm…Chiangmai. Why, is it bothersome?

Rate of change? Good grief, another gimmick. Earths climate has been changing long before what humans are capable of ascertaining from the natural history record with greater variables than what humans have observed. The rest is just politics.

More asphalt and concrete = higher readings and those are included. Get a grip.

What evidence source do you have that shows temperature measurements are not affected by asphalt and concrete? Good grief, get off it already ????

How dare you say such things, don’t you know it will incite hysterical hissy fits of the greenywokiet@rdzies where the belief of solar cycles have no place in that reality and where only skewed political science can exist!