EveryG

It appears you lack reading comprehension skills as well. Hitler was LITERALLY saying we are not socialists, we are stealing the term and separating it from Marxism. He then went on to imprison and kill people who fall under the common definition of socialists. He literally told you this is an orange, not an apple. Your inability to comprehend this shows how much you are blinded by ideology and allergic to facts. Nazism was not socialism and it was not left-wing. You have not proven your claim at all.

I am of the OPINION that socialism and communism will always result in totalitarianism. I don't need to rewrite history as you have attempted to do to have that opinion. Your post is an attempt to make a simple point super complicated for what appears to be no reason at all. Let me prove you wrong in a more simple way: AND https://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/hitler-nazi-form-of-socialism-1932/ So above you can see Hitler himself refutes your equivocation of nazis with bolshevism and/or socialism. He later made good on his promise: So...again I say that your op is total nonsense.

You claimed "National Socialism was a Left Wing Socialist Political Movement" and you failed to prove that in your OP. Period. You refuse to address your logical fallacies directly because they are so incoherent, therefore you pose a new series of questions to deflect. Find me one serious historian who agrees with this premise. Anyone who makes this claim is a political sycophant engaging in revisionist history. And let's all be logically cohesive. The fact, and it is a fact, that the Nazi party was a right-wing branded party does not mean all right-wing parties are like Nazis. Even even it was a left wing party, it doesn't mean left-wing parties are Nazi parties. This is a fallacy looking for an illogical argument. Thus, total nonsense.

Your first post proves you are incapable of response anyway. And the fact that you could format a response however you want shows that you are making excuses. Rather pathetic, much like your original 6th grade book report

Line by line, here you go: All of your many misspellings in red, my responses in green.

I have literally argued against every one of your points. You are the only one incapable of response. More nonsense. You think that in your world if everything can be neatly put into left and right boxes the world makes sense. My point is that this is a childish view of the world, not worthy of serious debate, and completely illogical. Again, I feel like this is coming from a 12 year old.

You seem to be under the impression that I am interested in your response- let me assure you I am not. My previous post was for people who may have mistakenly thought you wrote something serious- I demonstrated clearly that what you wrote was incoherent nonsense, superficial, and the pointless ramblings of a political sycophant. You can't handle my point, which is that by the logic of your OP, the entire foundation of the US was also equivalent to socialism. I'm not making that argument, but it shows how flawed what you originally wrote is. None of your points add up to the conclusion- not even close. The irony of you asking for clear definition of common terms when you seek to distort commonly known terms in your op is hysterical. I do not have time to explain logic to those who have demonstrated already they do not comprehend it....try using Google. I find it comical that anyone would think your original post has anything close to a substantial argument. Take any statement you made, but just as an example saying "Revolution is a tool of the left" when the country you claim to be so proud of was born of revolution. The OP is completely ridiculous on its face, worthy of nothing but mockery.

And no matter how bigly he fails, you will find your scapegoats in the boogeymen that you have created in your imagination. Right now we have 2 parties playing the same game, which is counting on their sycophants to tow the party line. Democrats will scream at Trump's every move and MAGAs will defend him despite the fact that he has no vision other than staying out of prison. I dare say between the two of you, the US future looks bleak.

Your posts are one logical fallacy after another, this one being the appeal to ignorance, which is the entire MAGA approach to the world. You are simply attempting a revisionist history based on your political views, not on history at all. Your entire first post is based on the Historian's fallacy and Presentism. Let me show you: So, there...I have demonstrated how your post is complete and total nonsense. You will no doubt come back and move all of your goalposts to argue how the US is different. Again, just continuing your series of one logical fallacy after another.

Nonsense does not need disputed

I put this at about the level of a 12 year old giving a social studies report and I would give it a C-

So in conclusion, you think the US should annex and control a free nation because you have decided Denmark is woke (a completely idiotic idea) and therefore Greenland must chose between good guy-MAGAs or woke-villains. The writers of Idiocracy could never have dreamed. lol

Right, cuz this forum is not littered with MAGAs doing the same thing

When Don dies, the party will collapse because it stands for nothing.

Easy with all of that evidence! Why deal with reality when you can hate people for things you make up about people you hate because of lies you heard on Fox?

Of course Donald has backed off of Tic Toc and he told us why above. Don Sr is easily understood-his only parameters are his malignant narcissism. He has no moral compass. He has no policy positions. He has no ideology. Donald is about himself and he is incapable of being anything else. These are the actual facts that support how Don Sr's narcissism influence a major policy position. Period. You can put up charts, talk about elections and polls...but he said tictok was a national security threat, now he says they're fine cuz he gets lots of likes and stuff. Pure narcissism, not a single rational policy point.

TV used to be the idiot box, now the idiots have gone to social media.

This has nothing to do with what I posted. Plus, I'm not a democrat, and never said a nice thing about Biden on this forum or anywhere else. You are incapable of following a simple line of thought and show your colors by going off on some irrelevant tangent. Donald is a malignant narcissist and nothing you posted contradicts that.

This just demonstrates that Trump world is completely incapable of engaging real issues. This is what happens when a generation of Hulk Hogan fans find a new hero in politics. You may as well find a forum of fake athletes and go argue who has the best finishing move Of course Donald has backed off of Tic Toc and he told us why: Don Sr is easily understood-his only parameters are his malignant narcissism. He has no moral compass. He has no policy positions. He has no ideology. Donald is about himself and he is incapable of being anything else.

At least the creepo cokehead is out of congress and where he belongs...one of Trump's BS media/ propaganda machines Maybe he and Don Jr can regularly cut lines together now

It's easy to see that you are not actually interested in evidence, but the evidence was already presented at a trial, seen by a jury, and Trump lost. There is no point in relitigating a jury trial here because you are not interested in arriving at the facts, as the jury was instructed to do. That's why he's been ordered to pay $5 million for sexually assaulting E Jean Carroll. Trump's defense was proven completely false - laughably so. You sound like a child denying obvious facts such as Trump cannot claim to have never met E Jean Carroll (which is what Trump actually claimed) when a picture shows them together. Some people here do not comprehend rules of evidence and how that relates to findings of fact, much like they don't understand how statistics and probabilities relate to polls.

And you can scream this until you are blue in the face, I never said he was. This is a literal strawman...oh wait, logical fallacies are like the MAGA SOP.

Wrong. There was that picture of them together shown at the trial. You. Are. A. Clown. Ironically, as Trump was lying saying that he never met her during his deposition, Carroll's lawyer showed him this picture. When asked who that woman was, he said it was Marla Maples. So Trump blew his entire defense up because they proved he did know her and that he would have been attracted to her at least in the same manner he was his own wife. The jury saw the taped deposition of Trump getting caught lying.

Again, your reading comprehension shocks me over and over. I was not accusing YOU of denying the fact of his convictions, but saying MAGAs will deny all of the evidence contained in those convictions. Same for all of the other examples. It's hard to tell if you are incapable or if you mind is just so twisted by ideology that you cannot read. Either way, no evidence will convince you that Trump committed sexual assault, that he committed criminal fraud, and that he committed fraud.

I know what all of the evidence was, and it was much more than just her word. Most notably was Trump's deposition where he was caught lying twice...with photographic evidence. Oops. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump So given how easy it is to find the evidence against Trump, what you wrote below only proves that you are really bad at lying.