Red Phoenix

BEST NEWS of the week! We already knew that Senator Ron Paul wants Fauci to be summoned for his role in the illegal Gain of Function saga. But this news is of a totally different caliber. When Doc Pete Chambers would win the seat and become governor of Texas, he vowed that on Day One of his tenure that he would issue arrest warrants for those who have committed crimes against humanity—starting with Anthony Fauci. So the heat is on, and looks like Fauci and all his complicits won't escape the jail sentences they rightly deserve. Source: https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/exclusive-texas-gubernatorial-candidate Retired Green Beret Doc Pete Chambers just announced he’s running for Texas Governor, vowing to issue arrest warrants for those who have committed crimes against humanity—starting with Anthony Fauci. He says he witnessed vaccine injuries firsthand among his own soldiers and is determined to hold the architects of the COVID pandemic accountable, no matter how powerful they are. “They will be afraid to come into Texas,” he warned.

For those that still believe that Public Health has 'our best interests at heart'... DISTURBING: He Tried to Report Vaccine Injuries — and Realized It Was Putting His Patients in More Danger Dr. Patrick Phillips tried to report vaccine injuries — then watched the system turn against his patients. Source: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/disturbing-he-tried-to-report-vaccine After submitting adverse event reports, Dr. Phillips discovered they were never filed. Public Health bypassed him, called his patients directly, told them their reactions weren’t real — and pushed them to take another dose. This wasn’t safety monitoring. It was gaslighting. Even Tylenol gets flagged in your chart after a bad reaction. But for these shots? They buried the report — and doubled down. This is malpractice. Documented. Dr. Patrick Phillips is a physician from Ontario, Canada, who has faced disciplinary actions from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) due to his social media comments and actions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. His licence was temporarily suspended, and he was later found to be incompetent by the Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal. The tribunal ordered that his certificate of registration be revoked, effective immediately, and he was required to pay $6,000 in costs. = = =

To mark the fifth anniversary of the first UK mask mandates, Smile Free have released a short film – ‘Masking Humanity’ – focusing on the harms caused by mask requirements in health and social care. Source: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-gary-sidley-watch-out-mask-mafia = = = By Dr Gary Sidley June 23, 2025 To mark the fifth anniversary of the first UK mask mandates, Smile Free have released a short film – ‘Masking Humanity’ – focusing on the harms caused by mask requirements in health and social care. THIS month marks the fifth anniversary of one of the most blatant reverse ferrets in public health history. Within little more than a month our political leaders, senior doctors and government scientists flipped from a stance of imploring us all not to wear a face covering in community settings to a totalitarian one of imposing mask mandates. The abrupt transition from a stance of ‘masks do more harm than good’ to the imperative that ‘we all must wear one’ was undertaken in the absence of compelling evidence that face coverings reduced viral transmission. Worse still, this abrupt change of policy had negative consequences: perpetuation of fear, speech-impaired toddlers, the social exclusion of the hard-of-hearing, reduction in the quality of health and social care, and the re-traumatising of those with histories of sexual and physical abuse, to name but a few. Given the pervasive and unnecessary suffering caused, we should not let those responsible for this cruel restriction slip quietly away. So, five years since the first UK mask mandates, let us remember the complicit. The article then continues by naming and shaming all the complicit ones, in five categories: The unhinged fanatics The power-intoxicated The manipulators The idealogues The weak You can read the full article here > https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-gary-sidley-watch-out-mask-mafia

= = = Article by Michael Nevradakis - July 1, 2025 Source: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-vaccine-lowered-chances-of-conception-study-of-1-3million-women-finds/ = = = THE rate of successful conception – a pregnancy leading to live birth nine months later – for women who received the covid vaccine was ‘substantially lower’ than for unvaccinated women, according to a new peer-reviewed study. Brian Hooker, chief scientific officer for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), called the study’s conclusions alarming. He said: ‘This preliminary analysis shows that much more information is needed to understand both short- and long-term implications of the different types of covid shots on fertility and pregnancy parameters. This information should have been obtained prior to any public use of the covid vaccine.’ The results showed that by June 2021, approximately six months after covid vaccines became available to the public, successful conceptions per 1,000 women were considerably lower for vaccinated women. The researchers observed an increase in the rate of successful conceptions for unvaccinated women beginning in June 2021, which ‘was maintained over the subsequent six-month period’. In 2022, the rate of successful conceptions ‘stabilised’ among both vaccinated and unvaccinated women but remained ‘about 1.5 times higher’ for the latter group. The preliminary analysis, by five researchers from the Czech Republic, Denmark and Sweden, was published last week in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine. The study examined data obtained from the Czech Republic, one of the few countries where nationwide birth data for women who were vaccinated or unvaccinated for covid are available. The researchers analysed data on 1.3million women aged 18-39 between January 2021 and December 2023. The authors said their reasons for undertaking the study included existing research showing that covid vaccines have adverse effects on ‘menstrual characteristics’ and the lack of data on the effect of covid vaccines on birth rates. You can read the full article here > https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-vaccine-lowered-chances-of-conception-study-of-1-3million-women-finds/ And here the link to the study > https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09246479251353384

Scientists make surprising discovery about drinks stored in glass bottles: 'We were expecting the opposite result' Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/scientists-surprising-discovery-drinks-stored-111521693.html Researchers studying microplastic contamination in common beverages made a startling discovery: Drinks stored in glass bottles contained between five and 50 times the level of microplastics as drinks in plastic bottles. "We were expecting the opposite result when we compared the level of microplastics in different drinks," said Iseline Chaïb of the Aquatic Food Safety Unit, which conducted the study at the ANSES Laboratory for Food Safety. = = = My comment > A somewhat conflicting message in the article: > Drinks stored in glass bottles contained between five and 50 times the level of microplastics as drinks in plastic bottles. > by avoiding single-use plastic containers in the first place, we can send a message to companies that we value more environmentally friendly packaging.

In America what we call bread can't even be considered food in parts of Europe. See, here in America, it's not so much the gluten as what we've done to the grain About 200 years ago, we started stripping the bran and germ or the fiber in nutrients to make flour shelf stable, also nutritionally dead Because the nutrients were gone, we enriched it with folic acid, which a large majority of the population can't even metabolize Therefore many people experience fatigue, anxiety, hyperactivity and inflammation. But then the bread wasn't white enough, so they bleached it with chlorine gas The bread didn't rise enough, so they added a carcinogen called potassium bromate, which is banned in several countries like Europe, the UK and even China Then we wanted to ramp up production, so we started using glyphosate to dry out the wheat before harvest, causing endocrine disruption and damaging your gut So now you're bloated, brain fogged, tired and blamed gluten. But gluten is just the scapegoat. The real issue is ultra processed, chemically altered, bleached, bromated, fake vitamin filled wheat soaked in glyphosate. This isn't bread.” You just want normal food? Well, you will have to grow it… Otherwise, enjoy your daily poison…

Joe Rogan Calls Out American Bread… “Our bread is so fcked — We're fcking poisoned”…

MenQuadfi Approval and the Pyramid Scheme of Vaccine Safety Source: https://substack.com/home/post/p-165864586 Recently, FDA shamefully approved Sanofi’s MenQuadfi (a meningococcal vaccine) to be injected into infants 6 weeks to 2 years old based on a trial that compared it to Menveo (another meningococcal vaccine). In the trial, 5.3% of infants receiving MenQuadfi and 3.6% of infants receiving Menveo had a serious adverse reaction (which means something very serious, see the FDA definition). But because these rates were “similar,” this product was deemed “safe” by FDA—because it assumes Menveo is also “safe.” But Menveo was licensed based on a trial in which Menactra (among other vaccines) was used as a control; and Menactra was licensed based on a trial in which Menomune was used as a control; and Menomune was not licensed based on a proper placebo-controlled trial either. In fact—and this is mind-twisting—the package insert for Menomune lists the clinical trial for Menactra (in which Menomune itself was used as the control) as the basis for its safety. I couldn’t even dream of making this stuff up. This provides a good example of the vaccine safety pyramid scheme ( … ).” You can read the full article with all details and references here: https://substack.com/home/post/p-165864586

Just saying, but the fact that you need medical care is already testimony for the success of the vaccines and allopathic medicine in general...

I fully agree with @rumak and @rattlesnake that the free Newsletter issued daily by Jeff Childers is very highly recommended. His Newsletter 'Coffee and Covid' is one of the first mails I read every morning with Jeff's take on 4-5 hot current issues. Need I say that I am far better informed from reading that free Newsletter than reading or listening/watching the mainstream media? And not only that, but Jeff often has a scoop on events that MSM are trying to gaslight you on, and he is as good as always first before any of these worthless media are even reporting on it. > Here the link to subscribe to the Free daily Newsletter, so that you get it daily in your email-box. https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/ Note that you can also read his Newsletters on his substack (same link > https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/ } where you can access the archive of all his postings. But it is only when he posted a new Newsletter, that the previous one becomes accessible on his substack. So it's well worth subscribing to that Newsletter.

Cannot bring myself to read one more report on the Bat or Lab discussion. Imo the obsession with determining the 'origins of the virus' is nothing more than a deliberate fabrication to distract from far more important Covid-19 related questions.

Big Pharma and the Media are at it again. Pushing faulty tests and harmful drugs. Source: https://ianbrighthope.substack.com/p/big-pharma-and-the-media-are-at-it = = = > Articles in the media are surfacing that serve as a thinly veiled pharmaceutical propaganda pieces, peddling fear and misinformation under the guise of public health guidance. Their core premise—urging individuals to "know" their risk for severe COVID-19 and "act quickly" with a plan—rests on a foundation of scientifically dubious practices and profiteering motives that have plagued the COVID-19 response from the outset. Specifically, the reliance on PCR tests with their notorious false positive rates and the aggressive promotion of toxic, overpriced antivirals like remdesivir represent a scandalous betrayal of public trust, prioritising corporate gain over human lives. I want to dismantle these practices with an unapologetic clarity, exposing their flaws and the harm they’ve inflicted. First, let’s address the PCR test debacle, which has been the linchpin of the COVID-19 "case" narrative. The articles implicitly endorse the use of PCR tests to identify COVID-19 cases, a methodology that has been thoroughly discredited by independent scientists and critical analysts. PCR tests, when run at high cycle thresholds (Ct values often exceeding 35 or even 40), amplify genetic material to the point of absurdity, detecting minute fragments of viral RNA that are often non-infectious or even unrelated to SARS-CoV-2. A 2020 study published in The BMJ highlighted that RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 were not validated against a gold standard, with design flaws leading to non-specific amplification and rampant false positives. The Swiss Institute of Microbiology noted these tests’ propensity for erroneous results, yet they were weaponised to inflate case numbers, creating a phantom pandemic of "asymptomatic" carriers. Posts on X have echoed this, with users citing false positive rates as high as 95-99% due to the inability to isolate the virus itself, rendering the entire testing regime a fraudulent exercise in fearmongering. This misuse of PCR tests had catastrophic consequences. By labelling healthy individuals as "positive" based on meaningless results, hospitals and governments justified draconian measures—lockdowns, forced quarantines, and unnecessary medical interventions—while funnelling billions into testing industries. These article’s call to "act quickly" upon a positive test ignores this context, perpetuating the myth that a PCR result equates to a genuine health threat. It’s not just misleading; it’s a deliberate obfuscation of the test’s limitations, designed to keep the public in a state of perpetual panic and compliance. Now, let’s turn to the insidious push for antivirals, which reeks of pharmaceutical collusion. The recommendation to "act quickly" with a plan likely points to drugs like remdesivir, a toxic and exorbitantly priced antiviral that has become a poster child for COVID-19 profiteering. Remdesivir’s track record is a horror story: during Ebola trials, it was known to cause organ damage, particularly to kidneys and livers, yet it was fast-tracked for COVID-19 under Emergency Use Authorization by figures like Anthony Fauci, despite its dismal efficacy. X posts have detailed how remdesivir’s use in hospitals was linked to worsened outcomes, with patients placed on ventilators and dosed with this drug suffering higher mortality rates. The drug’s cost—often thousands of dollars per course—stands in stark contrast to cheaper, safer alternatives like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and zinc which were vilified or suppressed to protect remdesivir’s market share. These articles fail to question these antivirals or acknowledge their risks are not just journalistic negligence; it’s complicity in a system that monetised suffering. By urging readers to seek treatment for "high-risk" conditions without scrutinizing the drugs involved, the article becomes a mouthpiece for Big Pharma, steering vulnerable people toward interventions that may harm rather than heal. The financial incentives are glaring: hospitals received bonuses for COVID-19 diagnoses and remdesivir use, a fact highlighted in X discussions about the Fauci hearings. This created a perverse cycle where false positive PCR tests fed patients into a pipeline of toxic treatments, enriching pharmaceutical giants while patients paid the ultimate price. The broader implications are chilling. The article’s fear-driven narrative—know your risk, act fast—relies on a distorted reality where flawed diagnostics and dangerous drugs are presented as salvation. It sidesteps the inconvenient truth that early treatment protocols, natural immunity, and basic supportive care (like vitamin D, vitamin C and zinc) were often more effective and far less harmful. By omitting these alternatives, these articles perpetuate a one-size-fits-all medical tyranny, stripping individuals of informed choice and critical thinking. The slick presentations and authoritative tone mask the role as a cog in a machine that has eroded trust in science and medicine. In conclusion, the articles are a damning indictment of the industry, embodying the worst excesses of the COVID-19 era. Uncritical endorsement of false positive PCR tests and toxic antivirals like remdesivir reveal a reckless disregard for truth and human welfare. These practices didn’t just mislead; they fuelled a global hysteria, bankrupted economies, and cost countless lives under the pretence of public health. The articles failure to question the establishment narrative makes it not just misleading but morally bankrupt, a shameful artifact of a time when fear and greed trumped reason. The public deserves better—they deserve the truth, unfiltered and unapologetic. Ian Brighthope

And it's Aussie17 on his PharmaFiles substack that is bloody furious. Let’s put this in perspective. Operation Warp Speed—the big, flashy U.S. government push—had vaccines developed, tested, and rolled out in under a year. Pfizer’s “safe and effective” trial for the jab was done and dusted by late 2020, with emergency approval by December (with 44,000+ participants no less!). Less than 12 months, and they were slapping it into arms worldwide, telling us it was all good. So why, oh why, do they need 10 years—from 2021 to 2030—to tell us if this thing is causing myocarditis, a nasty heart inflammation that’s been popping up in young blokes especially? And this study only enrolled 300 participants!! It’s like they sprinted to get the jab out, then decided to crawl when it came to checking the damage. Something stinks here, and I’m not buying the excuses. I reckon Pfizer’s dragging this out because by 2030, the bigwigs like Bourla and his mates will be retired, living it up in some cushy, lawsuit-proof hidey-hole. With only 300 participants in this study, it’s a tiny sample to stretch over such a long haul—sounds more like a cover-up than a proper investigation. I’m gobsmacked that they can push a product on millions, rake in billions, and then say, “Oh, we’ll get back to you in nearly a decade on whether it’s wrecking hearts.” Fair dinkum, it’s a slap in the face to everyone who trusted them! Let’s dig into some real data, because I’m not just ranting for the sake of it. There’s a massive study out of Israel by Tuvali et al. < https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35456309/ > (which was already out in 2022!) with 196,000 cases and 590,000 controls. They found no excess rate of ICD-10-coded myocarditis in unvaccinated folks who had natural COVID infections. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Yet, we’re supposed to believe the vaccine’s the safe bet? What about this Oxford preprint that looked at over 800k kids in England who got the Pfizer jab < https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810v1 >. They found a higher incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis linked to the vaccine, especially in boys, with rates jumping after the second dose (up to 27 cases per million doses). Healthy kids getting heart trouble? That’s a bloody wake-up call! Why the Long Delay? So, why the ten-year wait with only 300 participants?? If they could smash out a vaccine trial in under a year, why can’t they nail down myocarditis risks faster? My guess—and it’s not a pretty one—is that they’re stalling. Maybe the data’s not looking good, and they’re hoping people forget, move on, or worse, that the statute of limitations kicks in. With only 300 participants, this study’s a joke compared to the millions who’ve had the jab. It’s like testing a new car model on three drivers and calling it road-ready. I reckon they’re buying time to protect their profits and their necks. Source: https://www.aussie17.com/p/pfizer-drags-myocarditis-study-to

Pfizer’s just kicked the can down the road again, extending their COVID vaccine-induced myocarditis study by a whopping five years. Yep, you heard that right—it’s now set to wrap up in November 2030, up from the original 2025 finish line. Check the study yourself here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05295290 10 years from the vaccine’s launch to figure out if it’s torching people’s hearts? Are you kidding me?

You seem fine after your many safe vaccines also. The heading of the topic reads... Will there ever be a safe vaccine? Now go away and annoy someone else. Lots of safe vaccines. Stupid question. ... Now go away and annoy someone else. Thanks for your interesting facts and evidence based take on the issue. It finally convinced me that SAFETY FIRST is the main concern in vaccine matters.

A double NO > No, my response to your incorrect statement was not 'something that I just made up as usual' > No, ChatGPT is definitely not my ultimate source of truth. But it's a handy tool to check non-controversial topics. And it provides the source for any statements that it makes, so can delve deeper there.

Congratulations, that's a first. Never before did I came across a poster using the argument that when many people don't agree with you that this means that you are wrong.

I simply queried ChatGPT about the current 2025 status of those 9 new vaccine-billionaires Here the response of the program (with source reference in small print at the end of each paragraph). Here’s the status as of mid‑2025 for each of the nine “vaccine billionaires” you listed. Note that in my earlier querky that the program responded that all 3 Chinese CanSino Biologics executives were still billionaires as of now. But that in my renewed query - rendered below - that it now states that it could not confirm the financial status of Mao Huihua at present. 💉 Moderna & BioNTech Affiliates Stéphane Bancel Estimated net worth has dropped significantly. GuruFocus places it around $570 million (June 2025) indiatimes.com+3lynnwoodtimes.com+3usa.life+3gurufocus.com. No longer a billionaire. Uğur Şahin Still firmly in billionaire territory, with ~$4 billion (Forbes, March 2025) forbes.com+12forbes.com+12africa.businessinsider.com+12urfanatik.com+1forbes.com+1. Remain a billionaire. Timothy Springer Foro­bes lists him as a billionaire (~$1.1 bn April 2025) forbes.com. However, alternate estimates drop his worth to ~$98 million marketscreener.com+6insidertrades.com+6marketscreener.com+6. Uncertain—Forbes labels him a billionaire, but other sources dispute this. Noubar Afeyan Estimates vary widely: MarketScreener ~$65 million (April 2025) forbes.com+4meaww.com+4billionaire.oftheweek.com+4marketscreener.com+4marketscreener.com+4marketscreener.com+4; Grizzly Bulls index ~$1.17 billion grizzlybulls.com+2grizzlybulls.com+2grizzlybulls.com+2; Forbes still lists him as a billionaire in 2025 marketscreener.com+15forbes.com+15forbes.com+15. Unclear, but evidence leans toward no longer a billionaire, though some rankings disagree. Moderna Investors & Executives Juan López‑Belmonte Passed away in mid‑2021 usa.life+8moguldom.com+8indiatimes.com+8forbes.com. Therefore, not currently a billionaire (owned ~60% of Rovi before death). Robert Langer Still widely recognized as a billionaire: Forbes 2023 ~$1.6 billion forbes.com+2moguldom.com+2realtimebillionaires.de+2boston.com+1financeai.com+1. Remains a billionaire. CanSino Biologics Founders Zhu Tao Net worth ~$1.2 billion (as of June 2025) per GuruFocus grizzlybulls.com+10quiverquant.com+10benzinga.com+10. Remains a billionaire. Qiu Dongxu Also estimated at ~$1.2 billion (June 2025) . Still a billionaire. Mao Huihua I couldn't find any current verifiable net worth data. Status unknown, but no evidence supports billionaire standing today. 📊 Summary Table Name 2021 Status 2025 Status Stéphane Bancel $4.3 B ~$570 M — Not billionaire Uğur Şahin $4 B ~$4 B — Still billionaire Timothy Springer $2.2 B ~$1.1 B (Forbes) / ~$98 M — Unclear Noubar Afeyan $1.9 B $65 M–$1.17B — Likely not Juan López‑Belmonte $1.8 B Deceased 2021 Robert Langer $1.6 B ~$1.6 B — Still billionaire Zhu Tao $1.3 B ~$1.2 B — Still billionaire Qiu Dongxu $1.2 B ~$1.2 B — Still billionaire Mao Huihua $1 B Unknown

Dr Gerry BRADY comes to a completely different conclusion than what you wrote. ... There was no discernible “Pandemic of Death” in 2020 caused by the Covid virus and only one chart is necessary to reveal that. It is the Euromomo chart for Deaths from All Causes compiled week by week and published weekly from the death data of 27 nations in Europe. A short, sharp spike in All Cause death numbers did occur in the early months of 2020 but it was not extraordinary in size or volume. In fact, it was not dissimilar to what happens every winter with seasonal Influenza outbreaks. Seasonal Peaks of All Cause Death occur every winter and have done for decades. EUROMOMO CHART — DEATHS FROM ALL CAUSES IN ALL AGES Source: https://euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps The chart clearly shows that by May of 2020, the death numbers had collapsed back into the normal range. So, by then, anyone watching the published numbers knew that there was no “horrible, rapidly infectious, fearful” pandemic virus killing extraordinary numbers of people everywhere and anywhere. The weekly published numbers from Euromomo revealed the ugly truth. We were being lied to by almost all governments worldwide. There was no Pandemic of Death. And they continued to lie for the next 3 years, promulgating the argument that massive excess deaths were continuing to occur globally and that drastic measures were required to “contain” the “deadly” virus. Those governments then proceeded to offer only one “solution” – an injectable product, inadequately researched, containing synthetic genetic material (RNA) that was constructed in a laboratory and designed to hijack the body’s protein manufacturing mechanisms. And that product had never been manufactured previously in large volumes globally or trialled on large numbers of people. The rest is now history. Some reputable estimates of death from these products are between 15 – 30 Million globally (and still counting). And reputable estimates of serious adverse events are somewhere in the range of 20 times that number – possibly 600 Million people – HALF A BILLION injured and suffering serious ill effects. ... Source > https://boomfinanceandeconomics.substack.com/p/genetic-medicine-nightmare-for-investors

The 5 Moderna guys that became billionaires overnight, are not billionaires anymore as the Moderna stock has indeed lost more than 90% of its hot air balloon value from early 2021. But they are still very very wealthy. Note that the BioNTech CEO and the 3 Chinese CanSino Biologics executives are still billionaires.

I possibly did receive same 3 before becoming adolescent (don't recall and can't query my parents about it anymore). But what I do know is that since becoming adult I have NOT taken any vaccine for more than 50 years. And have ever since avoided to the extent possible any allopathic 'medicine' for the extremely rare cases that I was under the weather. That served me very well, as I am never sick.

The 9 new vaccine billionaires, in order of their net worth are: Stéphane Bancel, Moderna’s CEO (worth $4.3 billion) Ugur Sahin, CEO and co-founder of BioNTech (worth $4 billion) Timothy Springer, an immunologist and founding investor of Moderna (worth $2.2bn) Noubar Afeyan, Moderna’s Chairman (worth $1.9 billion) Juan Lopez-Belmonte, Chairman of ROVI, a company with a deal to manufacture and package the Moderna vaccine (worth $1.8 billion) Robert Langer, a scientist and founding investor in Moderna (worth $1.6 billion) Zhu Tao, co-founder and chief scientific officer at CanSino Biologics (worth $1.3 billion) Qiu Dongxu, co-founder and senior vice president at CanSino Biologics (worth $1.2) Mao Huihua, also co-founder and senior vice president at CanSino Biologics (worth $1 billion) Note that 5 of those new billionaires have Moderna ties. On top of the new billionaires, another 8 vaccine-billionaires saw their wealth in 1 year rise with several more billion $ Also that wealth-increase is based on the early april 2021 Forbes report. So that's only 4 months after the very first approved and publicly administered Covid-19 vaccine was provided.

Was it published in an accredited peer-reviewed journal, or RFK Jr.'s new governmental in-house medicinal tabloid? The CDC report mentioned in the link to the MSN story, was posted on the CDC's website. The report stated a.o. that evidence does not support a link between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism or other neurodevelopmental disorders. Why does this matter? The report posted by CDC is part of the information package that the CDC provides to the ACIP panel, that will meet in course of next week and advise on vaccine policy. The incorrect statement in the CDC report ignited the ire of RFK jr who for in response posted a long rebuttal on X. Thimerosal - a vaccine adjuvant - is anything but 'safe' Here the link to RFK jr's X-post > https://x.com/SecKennedy/status/1937696602996576528

"Listening to him is like listening to a bicycle repairman explain how to make a rocket." So a bit like listening to you... You can also read the original X-post that RFK jr wrote on that issue (see link higher). Ooooh. but he is a lawyer too. Maybe ask Fauci to shine his darkness on the matter...

HHS Secretary Kennedy unleashed a 1500-word MOAB of a tweet yesterday about vaccines, stenographic corporate media, and white coated lies. It is far too long to republish the whole thing (read it for yourself). His theme featured a common vaccine ingredient, thimerosal, and his targets included luminaries such as The Guardian, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and “the vaccine industry” writ large. Source: