Cameroni

Lol, this is is insane! The world is turning mad. How are fake AI images a "sexual crime"? They depict scenes that are not real. We can't distinguish between reality and fantasy now? Surely this is a clear sign the world has gone mad.

Only if it is shown that they caused harm.

"The equal for the equal, and what logically follows, the unequal for the unequal" Friedrich Nietzsche.

Alzheimer's is the death of the person though. So that effectively kills the person.

Dealing with impotence would definitely make you mentally stronger. Also dealing with depression would make you mentally stronger if it doesn't kill you.

No, if you lose a leg or arm it will make you mentally stronger. Same if you have to deal with a disability. It will make you mentally stronger.

Yes it is, it makes your immune system stronger. If you survive Covid, you can withstand some strains of Covid easier.

Because it's not child porn!!! It's just fantasy art! It's not real! I'm aware of the legal position, but the law is obviously wrong in this case. It's creating a fake construct for policy reasons. AI images are not real. How can it be "child porn"? It's fake!

It does. It makes you immune to Covid strains.

Nice selection. I just heard a song on the radio using a Nietzsche aphorism. "What doesn't kill you only makes you stronger." Imagine this guy Nietzsche writing in the 19th century, and in 2025 people are still quoting him. Now that's longevity.

Obviously fake. But it doesn't matter how realistic they are. Fake is Fake! It's not real! You would punish someone over pixels? That depict things that are not real? Seriously?

They are not real images! They are FAKE. It's not "child porn". It's like cartoons. It's no more real than when you have a giant horse cartoon talking. I'm seriously worried you want to criminalise people based on FAKE images. On Art basically. If this kid had drawn a pornographic image I guess he should also go to jail? That's insane. Criminalise where there is real harm. Not thought crimes.

Why would I care? It's a FAKE image. Plus I could just whip out my Anaconda to any doubters.

You mean the fake images that are not real? Repercurssions for images that are not real? Annoyance? Upset? I'm really trying, but I can't seem to get worked up about it.

Keep telling yourself then that you're not paying. But don't tell me. I know you're paying. Like everyone else.

What lies have I said? Kindly quote it here. The lies come from the women. Not me. And from you guys. I think you are upset you're getting it straight. And you have to admit your relationships are all transactional, without exceptions. I guess that jars your fantasy world, and conflicts with the lies you're telling yourself.

An absolute truth is just a truth that is universal and doesn't change, as we are talking about human beings, we can confine the universal aspect to human beings. We don't need to be concerned if theories like MOND make some exceptions for stars. As regards human beings, all human beings are subject to gravity, it is a unviersal absolute truth therefore. Just like the law that all relationships are transactional.

Or just because it is the f***ng truth. All relationships are transactional.

There are absolute truths, the laws of physics, gravity, electromagnetism, the Pythagorean theorem and of course the law that all sexual relationships are transactional.

Which is also insane. Incarceration should be for instances where serious harm occurred. A kid doing fantasy digital art may cause offence, hate speech may cause offence. But offence is not real harm. If this kind of stuff is prosecuted we're into the realm of thought crimes. Prisons will overflow.

How is this a "disturbing" incident? The images are not real. It's FAKE. It's not like he forced the girls to do the acts depicted in the FAKE photos. Again, these are FAKE images. Not real. Are we going to send people to prison for fantasy and FAKE images now? Do me favour.

Yes it is. Of course you can never mention that it's a transactional relationship. Both parties have to talk of "love" and affection, and have to believe in the love story. But ultimately, the woman wants something from the man and the man wants something from the woman. If that's not the case, then there is no relationship.

Your quibble is that the men actually believe they're not paying. I don't buy it, I think they know they're paying. They're just pretending otherwise. I mean there are a few exceptions. Where the woman is much older and has no sexual market value, she may pay for the guy if he's half-way attractive, if that woman has resources. However, these arrangements are so marginal and so few, I don't even count them. There are instances too where say a solicitor woman will be with a guy who earns less, then the guy is paying her with other means, services, attention, gifts etc. But the man pays. Always. Even with the super rich boyfriend of Taylor swift, he's making her bracelet beads, he's paying her.

It's always a "sugar daddy" arrangement. Sugar daddy just means the man is providing gifts and money. There is almost no man alive that is not providing gifts and money to his girl, whatever the age gap. Even the youngest, fittest influencers with muscles like Schwarzenegger are buiying cup cakes for the girls, believe me. I've seen them say so. It doesn't even have to be money. Maybe the girl is interested in the social standing benefits, or in the looks, charm, or sex, or something other than money. But the man will pay her one way or the other. Because people only enter into relationships if they want something from the other. If they don't then there's no need to enter into the relationship. I wouldn't know, I've never been with a bar girl. But I've been with plenty of non-professional girls that are 20 years old. And even if you don't have to give them a salary, you don't, you still have to give them money now and then.

Everybody has to pay for his woman. "Mojo" only gets you in the door. To stay, you have to pay. All relationships are transactional. Every single one. Any guy who tells you he doesn't pay for his girl is lying to your face.