Cameroni

Yes, stainless steel is far superior to the mostly plastic ones sold in Thailand. If I were to get one, not that I will, but if I did, this is what I would get.

Nor was this woman raped. She had a hand down her trousers. I think she'll live. Yes, that's what she says. Apparently it's worse than losing both your legs.

Well done for admitting to being wrong publicly, never easy to do. What is so appalling about this case is not that the perpetrator was convicted. The appalling thing here is that the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme was set up to compensate victims of crime who've suffered serious criminal injuries. Very obviously the intention here was to compensate people who suffered physical injuries, got shot, stabbed, or lost a limb in a criminal negligence factory incident. However, this woman is trying to game the system by claiming her hand down the trousers incident was a "criminal injury", and thus have the taxpayer pay her out tens of thousands of pounds. These types of frivolous attempts by gold diggers to game the system and abuse a criminal injuries compensation fund that is funded by the taxpayer should be made illegal. It is absolutely disgusting for this woman to complain she doesn't get a penny, of course she shouldn't get a penny. It's outrageous she even tried to get a payout, given that she did not sustain any criminal injury of a physical nature that is in any way seirous.

Of course not. it's taxpayer funded. That's right, only men can be convicted of rape in England, it's a terrible injustice. But don't fear, parliament may implement changes that would allow women to be charged with rape: https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/300270

That's exactly what she's doing. She was hoping for a massive cash payout from the taxpayer funded compensation scheme and is not getting a penny. It's hilarious.

A small token of reciprocity for the billions the US threw at Ukraine.

Well done for SPECTACULARLY missing the point, the UCR definition of rape is supremely irrelevant in this instance. This is not an American, the crime did not happen in America, the airline is not American. American codes, laws and definitions do not apply one way or the other. In this case English laws apply. And in England, guess what, there are SEPERATE offences for rape, on the one hand, and for assault by penetration, whkch includes fingering. In England this is what applies: "Rape The legal definition of rape is when someone puts their penis in another person's vagina, anus or mouth, without the person's permission." "Assault by penetration Assault by penetration is when someone puts an object or any part of the body other than their penis (for example fingers) into another person's vagina or anus, without the person's permission." https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/ro/report/rsa/alpha-v1/advice/rape-sexual-assault-and-other-sexual-offences/what-are-rape-sexual-assault/ So total "fail" jvs, well done. The assailant here was not convicted of "rape". He was convicted of "assault by penetration", ie fingering.

Respect.

That "clown" is the only one who's made real efforts to stop the war, unlike von der Leyen, Boris Johnson, Macron and all the other Euro losers in charge. May there be many more "clowns" like this who try their best to stop wars.

AFTER NATO broke its promises and announced it would accept Georgia and Ukraine as new members. AFTER NATO broke its promises and announced it would accept Georgia and Ukraine as new members. After Ukraine made clear they will switch sides to join the US and the EU and NATO, thereby invalidating any and all agreements with Russia which were made on a wholly different premise.

Again, stop talking nonsense, the guy already paid the consequences. He was convicted. That's not what this thread is about. This tread is about how this woman is outraged that she can't get 50,000 pounds FROM THE TAXPAYER compensation for the hand down her trousers.

Hand down the trousers, then she got up. Almost nothing happened, but she wants 50,000 pounds compensation. And these people are defending her! Lol.

Yah, this doesn't work for the chosen one. He needs a new shtick.

It clearly was not rape, read the article, it was sexual assault. If it had been rape it would have said "rape". It doesn't. It says "sexual assault". The guy put a hand down her trousers and she got up. They were sitting in an airplane.

It's just disgraceful, these women being outraged because she can't cream tens ouf thousands of pounds off the taxpayer for a hand down her trousers. Sickening. And of course the usual enablers defending this sick behaviour.

What a try-hard this Newsom.

Stop talking nonsense, the guy was caught and paid the price. Clearly he faced the consequences. The sick thing is how this woman thinks she's entitled to tens of thousands of pounds from the tax payer because she's had a hand down her trousers.

My pleasure, just click through the pop-ups.

The perpetrator was caught, he's paid the price. Why on earth should this woman get taxpayer's money? To compensate her for what exactly?

This is why we live in such an effed up world, because people like you defend these gold diggers. She can't get 20,000 pounds for having had a hand down her trousers, your heart bleeds.

Digital penetration, he put a hand down her trousers. So she should get compensated by the taxpayer, what did she lose her clitoris? Did her labia get amputated? This is insanity,.

Note, she's most upset about not getting a cash payout to "compensate" her for the hand down her trousers. Disgraceful she would get compensated by the taxpayer anyway. For a hand down the trouseres? This is like some Woody Allen movie.

"I the nation's favourite..will save America again" Is he mentally ill?

Not a huge fan.

None of those weird giant windmills in the country side. What a great president this is. He must be sent from up above.