Jump to content

Cameroni

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    7,831
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Cameroni

  1. Wilders was extensively discussed in leaked American diplomatic cables. In a briefing to president Barack Obama, he was described as "no friend of the US: Wilders has been bleaching and dyeing his hair to peroxide-platinum blond since at least the mid-1990s. He gives even anti-Islamists a bad name as his hatred for Islam is so extreme he distorts the Koran, a book he wanted to ban in Holland, he quotes verses and misinterprets them with the aim to incite hatred of Muslims. He is so extreme he was banned from the United Kingdom. Home Secretary Jacqui Smith banned Wilders from entering the United Kingdom, labeling him an "undesirable person" He is married to a Hungarian Jewess and bends the knee to Israel. He called for Judaism to be recognised as a state religion in Holland. Wilders also is very good friends with that charlatan and fraud Ayaan Hirsi Ali, as she is also a fellow anti-Muslim fanatic. He strolls around with his plantinum blonde dyed hair like a hatred-filled peacock. I've never seen anyone more contemptible rise to high office in Europe who was so extreme. Nigel Farage is a moderate by comparison.
  2. I do not get people who want to do it in public. You pay money for narcotics, surely the only way to enjoy them is in your bed at home with a lady? Why would you waste it by getting high in Big C? It makes no sense.
  3. I had acupuncture from a highly trained Western professional. I could not believe it, but boy does it work. You really notice the difference.
  4. Every relationship in every country is transactional. Parties enter into one when they want something from the other, or else there would be no relationship.
  5. Wilders unfortunately is an incompetent fanatic. It was miracle he got to the top in the Netherlands anyway. What a turn from left to right Holland has made. But he was never going to have support for long. He's a thoroughly dislikeable dirt bag.
  6. Exactly right. Where else was it gonna go, after having been down in the toilet for so long? Dollar going up again now. Was taking UJ short but that's coming to an end. There's big US news tonight anyway that will further push up the dollar.
  7. For once she does something useful. I dislike her intensely, but I respect her intentions in this case.
  8. All of them. Even your receipts for the hotel mini bar. Hide it all. She will try to go through them.
  9. In my case non-stop for 8 hours. Pure carnal bliss. But hide your papers.
  10. HIs Gold medal has to be withdrawn. This is cheating.
  11. Between 4000 and 5000 Baht. Not small change for many young Thai women.
  12. It's the lack of aircon I don't like.
  13. Well, we do not the trauma or situation the mother was in, perhaps she had no money to get a legal abortion. We don't know the facts.
  14. Absolutely. It's like with this Thai girl that told me she didn't want to update me every hour anymore. Once I accepted that she did not send videos anymore. After I accepted that she did not take my phone calls anymore. Lesson learned. Never accept any offensive actions. It's a slippery slope.
  15. I do agree with this. It is quite easy to develop a good vibe with a Filipina. Because he likes her and to have sex, just a wild guess.
  16. Yes, Malaysia is very cheap. Still, too rainy a place for me.
  17. Well, they had a tough time ever since they saved democracy single-handedly and had 20 million people die. Never really recovered from that. Communist insanity didn't help either.
  18. They can destroy the whole planet in 5 minutes. So more powerful than you and your daddy.
  19. It's amazing how tolerant Thais are of the "other". It really is. Personally I find it a bit repelling how they try to milk the LGBT cow, but it's certainly tolerant. Too tolerant maybe, our Thai friends?
  20. Always wanted to visit Labuan. I wonder if they got the financial centre of the ground now.
  21. No. You need to examine reality. The reality is that Russia is a very large and powerful country, and Ukraine is an orbit state that kept poking Russia in the eye with a pointy stick. Much like Panam did with the US. Guess what? In both cases the net result was the same, invasion. Panama too was a sovereign state. So what? Weaker nations have to accomodate to the sensitivities of stronger nations. That's just the way reality works.
  22. Who gave the US the right to invade Panama after it displeased the US? Reality.
  23. That's complete nonsense. Putin has repeatedly said the exact opposite, affirmed Ukraine's right to exist, denied the USSR can be revived or should be revived, all that is cheap NATO propaganda Russia has no intention to invade the Baltics or Poland, again just more scaremongering nonsense. No, as was made clear , despite claims of "non-alignment" Ukraine was very deeply co-operating with NATO in the many ways listed above. An explosive New York Times exposé by Adam Entous and Michael Schwirtz sheds light on major developments preceding the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. According to the report, the Ukrainian government entered into a wide-ranging partnership with the CIA against Russia. This cooperation, which involved the establishment of as many as 12 secret CIA “forward operating bases” along Ukraine’s border with Russia, began not with Russia’s 2022 invasion, but just over 10 years ago. Within days of the February 2014 Euromaidan Revolution that culminated with the ouster of President Viktor Yanukovych and ushered in a firmly pro-Western government, the newly appointed head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, reportedly proposed a “three-way partnership” with the CIA and MI6, the UK’s foreign intelligence service. Ukrainian security officials gradually proved their value to the U.S. by feeding the CIA intelligence on Russia, including “secret documents about the Russian Navy,” leading to the establishment of CIA bases in Ukraine to coordinate activities against Russia and various training programs for Ukrainian commandos and other elite units. https://responsiblestatecraft.org/cia-ukraine-russia/ I think the key issue is that Russia, for many years prior to 2008 made it clear that Ukraine joining NATO was as red line that could not be crossed. At the Bucharest announcement Putin voiced his clear opposition. He was ignored. When Ukraine persisted in co-opearting with NATO, whilst telling Russia it was non-aligned, obviously Russia could see what Ukraine was really doing. This was a grave concern because Ukraine is the key to the great European plains, which are impossible to defend if Ukraine joins NATO. So yes, it was legitimate on every level.
  24. Don't worry, she came back. She was here a few days ago.
×
×
  • Create New...