Jingthing

No it isn't.

You're not sorry.

I call BS. You're just trying to make excuses.

Yes I used to be a hippie but the reactions to the genderF presenting was massively more extreme.

I'm telling you lots of people do care about different gender presentations and you come up with your personal opinion on Mohawks. Weak.

Biden has a choice unfortunately. He won't be Article 25ed if he continues.

I share your admiration for Joe Biden and his first term. But for the good of the country now it's time for him to accept reality. Of course Harris is the most logical replacement but personally I think Whitmer has a real chance of landsliding maga that Harris doesn't.

So my friend and I were just walking down the street. People reacted with extreme hostiliy to the way he was dressed, which admittedly was rather bizarre. People assumed I was with him sexually and harassed me too. I wasn't really comfortable with the situation as I'm totally cisgender but my friend showed up that way and a real friend supports their friends regardless. If I had said, I don't want to be involved in this, I would have been almost as bad as the bigots. In what way were we in their faces? Needless to say I think your POV is full of it. A total denial of reality. BTW, this lovely guy influenced a major decision in my life in incredibly consequential ways. I will always cherish his memory GenderF clothes or not.

Harris has a better chance than Biden. Whitmer would be better as she'd sweep the Midwest. But I think Biden's chances are complete toast. People aren't nearly as logical about issues as you seem to think

For Traditional, you can withdrawal as little or as much as you want after age 59 1/2 (before there is a penality) until the age of required minimum withdrawals. You need to consult charts to determine your specific required minumum. There is no consistency rule. I think you might be talking about mainstream financial advice saying that at the starting age of your "retirement" that you should start at 4 percent withdrawal and then step up a little bit annually to account for inflation for the purpose of PROBABLY avoiding ever running out of money while alive. In other words as you get older that will rise to 5 percent, etc. But in reality there is no logical reason to keep those levels if you don't need the money to live in and markets are way down, etc. Or, on the other hand, there may be very good personal health/financial reasons to increase with withdrawal percentage one or multiple times. So those suggested guidelines are really just suggestions, and everyone would be wise to monitor their own personal situation.

I had a close college friend who enjoyed playing around with what he called gender(F word). I guess that was like being gender fluid. One time I walked around Boston with him while he was in a genderF outfit. I felt like both of us were going be murdered as we were being constantly harassed so that was eye opening. We weren't each others types sexually but that highly intelligent guy who was working on becoming a psychiatrist and was the least promiscuous gay man I ever knew died very young because of a broken condom with his boyfriend. I found that ironic. Why does defying gender presentation expectations trigger so many men to hatred and violence?

I seriously doubt that.

No! 73 for traditional. There is no withdrawal required for Roth.

Yeah the expected cuts unless they reform it are scary. A fix is easy but would require bipartisan action which is the maybe impossible part.

No. It's later. https://www.fool.com/retirement/plans/ira/distributions/ What are required minimum distributions for IRAs? Required minimum distributions (RMDs) are mandatory withdrawals that you must take from all of your retirement accounts, except Roth IRAs, beginning in the year you turn 73.

Polls about a black swan event that is probably going to happen (Biden exiting) are obviously of no value. Any democrat (except Biden) can beat Trump. Not saying they will, but to pronounce nobody can at this point is completely insane. Yes it will be challenging for Harris for sure, assuming it will probably be Harris, but she'll have a chance to reintroduce herself to the public and hopefully present a more popular face and her VP pick will be important. Good chance it will be Josh Shapiro who is a fiery communicator and will bring in swing state Pennsylvania and hopefully the midwest swing states as well.

No the focus is on this election, and I don't accept your fictional narrative that only Michelle can win. But I accept that Biden can't win.

Apparently, he only listens to his wife Jill. I kind of get it. He's come back miraculously before. Namely in his first nomination fight where he was written off as over before South Carolina. But you can't count on miracles when it comes to the ravages of age.

Hardly as Michelle has no interest in running.

The place reportedly has good hygiene. The large pot is cleaned well daily and only part of the "old" broth is added to continue the chain.

This guy liked it anyway. Review: Wattana Panich's 50-Year-Old Soup in Bangkok - Business Insider He compared the goat version to Malaysian / Singaporean bak ku teh, (a dish that I like). So maybe Sanctioned Ivan and the lovely Evalina are yahoos with no taste? I think they had the beef version.

If I am, I would be very surprised.

Wearing a Biden hat is not a thing because the democrats are not a CULT! Unlike Trump. So a false equivalence. So much so that most democrats including me want Biden to withdraw from seeking the nomination ASAP.

The restaurant was not pleased. The highlight of this video is the look on the lovely Evalina's face at the first taste of the famous broth. Have you tried the famous (approximately) 50 year old soup? Do you agree with Ivan and Evalina or not? I have a question. Is this like a boat noodle soup where they add fresh pork blood? I ask because of the color of the broth.

You can't wait for that, huh?