Jump to content

Jingthing

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    129,385
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jingthing

  1. More games. He was against a two state solution when he was 20 years old. Since he's been a politician he's had a mainstream view supporting it. Yes it's obnoxious to assume his views on Netanyahu aren't sincere. If he's not picked it will indicate that any Jew that supports the right of Israel to exist and defend itself holding the same views of the majority of all Americans on that issue is somehow not OK for the highest offices. I say that because it's obvious that he was going to be picked and if he's not it's about him being a Jew not his views on the conflict. I'm for Harris regardless but it's funny not ha ha that Mexico has a Jewish president before the US even has a Jewish vice president. No I'm not suggesting at all that Harris is a Jew hater. Not picking Shapiro because he's a Jew as that might hurt her chances to win is a reasonable political decision but a sad reason. Not to mention she's married to a Jew.
  2. As before you have obnoxiously distorted Shapiro's position on the conflict. He's in the mainstream of democratic politicians on that yet you again obsess about his ethnicity. He does not support apartheid or genocide. "A dangerous and destructive force" "One of the worst leaders of all time" Shapiro about Netanyahu
  3. Well both Bernie Sanders and more significantly Nancy Pelosi are pushing for Walz. So either way we're seeing a finishing line drama. I don't know much about Walz but the feeling is that he would be better for the demographic that Biden did better with than Harris can (older white men) OR Shapiro can. So from a purely electoral POV even though Shapiro probably brings Pennsylvania, Walz could bring more in close swing states.
  4. This isn't really a spoiler alert because the pick hasn't happened yet and this news is out there. Reportedly, believe it or not, the choices have now narrowed to only two. Walz and Shapiro. Yes it's going to be awkward for Pennsylvanian Shapiro if the announcement isn't him at the Philly event. Harris' running mate choice narrows to Walz, Shapiro, sources say (usatoday.com) WASHINGTON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has narrowed her search for a vice presidential running mate to two finalists, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, three sources with knowledge of the matter said on Monday. Harris, the U.S. vice president, is expected to announce her selection by Tuesday, ahead of her first scheduled public appearance with her running mate in the evening at Temple University in Philadelphia.
  5. If there was going to be two women on the ticket, it would have been Whitmer who really should be on top of the ticket, but that's another story.
  6. You sound upset that dear leader is losing. Maybe find a safe space.
  7. Not feeling it. It was about Trump. A man who can and does dish it out by the ton.
  8. Without checking any reviews, I gave The Emperor of Ocean Park tv miniseries a try. Didn't make it even half way through Episode One. Found it had no hook, boring, and low quality. But maybe black republicans will like it. MGM+'s Messy The Emperor of Ocean Park Rules Over Convoluted Empire | TV/Streaming | Roger Ebert MGM+'s Messy The Emperor of Ocean Park Rules Over Convoluted Empire
  9. Avocado toast. Breakfast of champions.
  10. I think Buttigeig is brilliant, but I am hearing he is a sellout to corporate interests. Walz is attractive but actually to the left of Harris. Standard political advice is to balance the ticket. Shapiro is to the right of Harris. Other advice is that Harris must be bold now to keep her momentum up. In that sense Kelly is probably the least bold choice. The others are probably bold enough. As far as my own prediction I still think it will probably be Shapiro but because Walz is trending I picked him. But I think she can make any of those six work so I would only be shocked if it's someone else.
  11. Total B.S. I've dealt with the issue. Those two boxers are women. I have NEVER said that any "self proclaimed "woman" can compete! You know I haven't. Yet you lie thinking you're winning a point. No point in wasting time engaging with posters who constantly lie. You're busted dude.
  12. Please vote. Time is running out.
  13. I'm still waiting for the flying tuk tuks promised twenty years ago!
  14. Shapiro appeared to have a lock but then in the last few days Walz is trending.
  15. You're promoting scapegoating and bullying them because of their superficial appearance.
  16. You're tripping. I said nothing of the kind. The IOC has judged that these specific two boxers are legitimately women and also not transgender women either. The IOC has judged that previous actions against these two women by the corrupt Russia linked IBA hold no credibility.
  17. This pick will happen within the next few days. I have included the names that I know to be the finalists. This poll asks who she WILL pick, NOT who you WANT her to pick. I will try to post the final results at the time of the pick when it happens (if possible). Obviously votes AFTER the pick are garbage so please don't even do that.
  18. That's nice. I'm rebranding as a massively wealthy 21 year old movie star.
  19. I did. Obviously not anyone can be a woman. Some men transition to trans women. Nobody is saying they are the same as females from birth. The two boxers under scrutiny in Paris were born female, are NOT transgender, but are now adult women.
  20. The boxers in question are indeed women.

×
×
  • Create New...