Stiddle Mump

You are not talking straight Sir. You have posted waffle and nonsense. Simply parroting MSM rubbish. Show where a virus exists firstly. Show then evidence that an illness can be passed from one to another. Can't rubbish nature with me and get away with it.

You are talking like a confused person. It is you that is making the claims that pathogenic germs /viruses exist. Where is there any evidence? 100s of years of research eh! Point me to a paper then. Of course germs are real. Who has said otherwise? Pathogenic germs are a new argument however. Show where they are capable of transferring illness from one to another causing the same illness. Stop the waffle. Stop the nonsense and point to a paper, anywhere, at any time that shows pathogens exist. In Dr Roytas' book he closely examines past studies, many by the US Navy Medical. Take a read Sir. Plenty of evidence is out there. By the way Sir your examples '',,,,Measles, HIV, Covid, Flu?'' are not caused by a virus, and the symptoms of them are not pathogenic. Nature has all the answers we seek.

I too have had access to electron microscopy. Although not in the last 30 years. Where is there a paper that shows, in humans, that a pathogen can be passed on from one person to another?

Never mind posting nonsense. Where is there a paper that shows a disease, caused by a virus, can be passed from one person to another?

Absolute anti-science nonsense. Where is there one paper that shows that? You are posting anti-nature stuff.

Viruses may exist as a form of cell and tissue debris. However, IMO, there is no such thing as a pathogenic virus. It may well be possible to transfer viruses from one person to another, but do they cause sickness? I say no! However; show me any experiments that show they do and I'll eat my words. Dr Roytas' book 'Can You Catch a Cold', researches over two hundred papers to get at the truth. This is analytical research looking at hard science. Not like your anti-science stance Sir. Made up nonsense from the white-coats. The evidence for there not being a pathogenic virus is there for all, and yourself, to see. None so blind as will not open their eyes. Observing nature would help you. I reckon the onus is on the person making the claim that pathogenic viruses exist, to present the evidence. Not see any yet. Love nature. Love yourself.

I'm here for three things really Sir. If you are not willing to take on board what I'm saying; well good for you. It's OK. Firstly; I'm encouraging people to do their own research. Plenty out there that tells a different story to the main line. www.CanYouCatchaCold.com Secondly; to help people. Even the vaxxed who have bad effects. You are forgiven. Thirdly; and perhaps most importantly. To love and appreciate ourselves as an integral part of nature. We are much a part of nature as a owl, flower or a storm. Without nature we are nothing. The white-coats would have us believe they can alter it, improve it and better it.

It's just a giant money spinner. Of course the money accumulated by Big Pharma trickles down through the regulatory authorities, the universities and to individual white-coats. They all support the vax programme. Been going on since the Rockefeller days over 100 years ago. Listened to a Dr Tenpenny interview last week. While she is fully supportive of Kennedy's work she emphasises that the politics are the progress stumbling block. Heads can roll - as they already have - but Big Pharma has political people in its back pocket. I'd like to see Dr Tenpenny on the advisory board. Along with Dr Kaufman. The US is one of the sickest- if not the sickest - countries in the world. The parents are so brainwashed they continually allow the white-coats to inject poison junk into their kids; 30+ times before many can even walk. It's sad. The US should be leading the way instead of falling over themselves to hurt the future generation. As for the white-coats; they should hang their heads in shame. Hopefully their walking-the-log days are to come. We are nature. Nature is us.

I think over 30 jabs are given before the toddlers are 18 months old. No vax is safe. No vax is effective. No vax is necessary. All simply anti-science. Dr Kary Mullis was right about the fraudulent Fauci. Spelt out by Kennedy and Mikovits in their books.

If you think giving 90 jabs to kids before teen years is good then you are smitten. Vaccines are not only anti-science, they are anti-nature.

Climate Change will be the reason for the big divide. The final, and deciding reason, why the west has to curtail the rest's ambitions. The UK and US leading the charge.

Let's here it for the humble pineapple. Agree with the IO. Very easy to grow.

Well, I love it here. Don't think there is a better place to be in the whole world. Beautiful nature. Beautiful people. Beautiful life.

Indeed! But some members will try to turn the conversation that way. It is the celebration of women. Get men out of their faces.

Fauci eh!? He knows less than RFK or me. Or rather, he does know stuff, but can't go against his Big Pharma masters. Hope you don't mind me quoting Dr Kary Mullis; "Fauci don't know what he is talking about.''

Some of the nubile ladies do.

Brilliant! Top of the class.

Disciple of nature Sir. Nature has all the answers.

It's great here. Comfortable, cheap and rewarding.. For me; there is no better place to be in the world. Not without its challenges of course. But they are minor when one considers the plus points. The locals are always kind and friendly to me. When I slipped over in the mud a while back, at least 5 ladies rushed over to pull me up. Just came back from the monthly market. Can go in looking like a tramp and come out like a prince for 300 baht. That includers new shoes and a nice hat.

You are rubbish. Call yourself an Owl. More like a turkey.

I just completed this quiz. My Score 0/100 My Time 215 seconds  

Money is King.

I kind of agree with you on saying it is good to sometimes suppress symptoms. I'm sure it would be a good thing to do if one has to work, and the symptoms are making that difficult. Suppressing symptoms leads to problems down the line. With your eye Sir. PM me with the problem details. And a bit of history.

The guys are faster for a number of reasons in swimming. They are generally bigger; with longer limbs and torso. Hands and feet are bigger. They have the ability to produce more energy. Their aerobic capacity is greater. The best of the females are roughly 10% behind the better males in all events, any distance.