mokwit

Not only this but the capture of the institutions is undemocratic, we are having political extremism forced upon us by undemocratic means.

He doesn't live in Thailand either, but posts solely political content on a Thai web board.

Very small size limit to upload. Any sites other than Facebook where you can upload a file and download it as a smaller file B wise?

Exactly this,

'Serwer spoke with several Trump supporters' do you think "several" out of 76.9m risks not being a representative sample? This is MSN relying on the low level of sophistication of it's readers. Not just the small sample size that would be completely meaningless statistically but HOW were they selected. what was the format of the discussion/questions.? They cherry pick several out of 76.9m and claim it is representative. Any bona fide market researcher or scientist would laugh at that (as I am). You keep falling for this. We don't.

These are US tax declaration forms. I have to fill in W8 Ben as a non US/non dom client of a US broker.

Most people think psychologists are whackjobs.

Not everything has a link. Often, that which can be supported with a link is propaganda.

Oh the irony, the pot calling the kettle black.

This is the critical part, selection by the Labour party, in some cases favoured candidates are "selected" and airdropped into safe seats.

Yes, thanks. After researching it seems some fermentations do produce small amounts of methanol and it is also produced in a reaction with stills made from e.g. aluminium (bootlegger type stills). In distillation you also discard the initial lighter fraction which would contain any methanol. It seems it is also wittingly or unwittingly (WRT dangers) added - presumably to increase potency.

Her sister is an MP too, how does that work?

I think you meant: women are more prone to BEING OFFERED free drinks.

Applies to them all. what a truly awful bunch.

'Yes she lied on her CV, but that's a good thing' is surely the headline they were looking for. With a bit of luck the rumours that she will be gone by the end of the day are based, not baseless.

It is the kind of look you give someone when you have conclusively trounced their arguments. HTH.

Absolutely 100% I am speculating, because in the absence of all the facts that is all we can do. It is called a HYPOTHESES. what do you think detectives do? They might form a hypotheses on the information to hand. Again: FYI scientific methodology is speculation, you start with an unproven hypotheses and try and knock it down. Speculation is how conclusions can be drawn. Anyway I have had enough of trying to have a reasonable discussion with someone with your personality profile. I'll bid you Good Day, sir

There's really no point in trying to have a discussion with you and your tactics is there Chomper? FYI scientific methodology is speculation, you start with an unproven hypotheses and try and knock it down. Speculation is how conclusions can be drawn. It's all tactics with you, isn't it? Here is a summary for the benefit of the board.

It's not that it is four, it is that if it just the one person who is not a young woman with blond hair, then you can't rule out accident. It just seems a remarkable coincidence that 5 out of 6 victimes were young women with blond hair rather than a mix of M/F black/blond hair etc. The lower the size of the homogeneous group "blonde women" vs 1 male the less you would think it was a drink picked up in error, 1:1 you couldn't draw any conclusion, same with 2 or 3, intuitively by 4 it starts to look a bit suspicious. If it was one male and 500 blond females you could quite reasonably suspect picked up spiked drink by mistake. remember those stories about a certain Island we can't name where young drunk women were "helpfully" escorted back to their hotel by the young men of the island. There was also the photo of the shed with a mattress in it on the way. Am I able to come down to your level with that?

No it is an understanding of the laws of chance, or are you suggesting that nobody ever picks up the wrong drink, especially when they are likely identical to look at?. See my edited version that I completed before I saw you had replied. What I am saying is if it is one vs 5 we can't rule out wrong drink picked up. Are you saying there is no chance somebody picked up the wrong drink in this environment. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14111525/Laos-methanol-poisoning-victims-drugs-spiking.html

Not if it is just one vs 5, that could easily be due to error. If it were two vs 5 I would have ruled out accident. If it were 5 females and 5 males I would not have suspected what I did. Your accusation is baseless and you clearly have no deductive reasoning power, just spout slogans.

Ah OK, but maybe his drink was spiked in error or he picked up the wrong one.

Oh, I thought you said you didn't make personal attacks?

Alternative hypotheses; Vodka apparently served to 100 guests but only 5 have problems - those 5 are young blond women (no?). Somebody spiked their drinks with alcohol that was actually methanol probably thinking to take advantage of them when they were intoxicated. It must have been a hell of a dose to kill that quickly. Methylated spirits causes people to keel over backwards before they can drink that much, but do it repeatedly and the optic nerve is damaged.