mokwit

My observation with my rejection was that it was always overnight - my guess here is that the system is not making comparions in realtime but does it in a batch overnight - if you got a rejection overnight it was an auto rejection and never got as far as an IO is my guess.

So rather than fix it, lets make everyone traipse to their Immigration Office.

What about people attacking entirely innocent children? Any comment for us on that one? How about the other riots, I am sure not mentioning them is an oversight on your part that you will be remedying, or are you going to do a ""TwotierKier" as he has now been Christened.

Let's see how many Stella Artois he can down.

I just pointed out the reality how you are/how you operate, hardly an attack.

That's rich coming from you, yourself the usual source of a slur. That and posting links seems to be all you and your fellow AN Politicos can do. Lets' call it the "Slur and link" tactic - used to avoid actually engaging and making counter arguments.

That's how it was with the original iteration - the window officially was between 15 and 7 days before, although someone said in another thread that if you you did it within 7-0 days it would be accepted.

Only in the minds of some people on this web board and the people who produce propaganda for them.

Look, if I am talking about control of the means of production, a defining feature of Socialism, then I would have thought it would indicate that I have not just seen "Socialism" in the name and assumed it was socialism. The controlled what was produced and which sectors the banks could lend to - there is a detailed description as to how they controlled the financial system out there. It was the fact that they were controlling the financial system for the benefit of their country that put them at odds with another system. For sure it might not be Socialism as defined by a political science academic. Volkswagen means people's car - a car for the masses. People were promoted to positions that only the aristocracy and junkerklasse previously held. Again it might not be Socialism as defined by a political science academic, but it was de facto socialism. I don't need your help to understand because I already do, it is you who don't and thinks because it had Socialism in the name I am thinking it must be socialism purely on that basis. You think I am unaware as to how names are used to pretend something is not what it is, and yes I know Hitler himself is on record as saying we should never have called ourselves "socialist", but they did that to attract votes, but it was much closer to means of production Socialism than laissez faire capitalism or the protection of the privileges of an elite class like South American 1970's right wing Governments. Perhaps it would be better if you stopped simplistically "correcting" me and explained what German National socialism actually was in your understanding.

I have a feeling with them getting increasingly "Freudian" about address reporting that will become some kind of strike against you. All I can say is if the increased obsession with address reporting is due to agents/signing off on multiple people using the same address they should go after it at source rather than inflict a group punishment on the law abiding.

We are supposed to "just know".

While you are employed by them. Companies push people out around 45 which is also the age at which medical issues tend to start. If you vest, Thai civil service insurance is for life (I think).

No it hasn't always been, that is a recent correction of them for years pointlessly only allowing you to file online 14-7 days - for some reason they needlessly extrapolated the postal posting window to the online system.

The iron rice bowl. Don't forget the medical cover is for the whole family.

I think the point here is that it WASN'T called out by those whose JOB it was to do something about it. Worse it was actually covered up for political reasons Labour politicians and coucilors. We had a Pakistani heritage Labour politician [Zarah Sultana] retweeting a tweet that said "these girls should keep their mouths shut for the sake of diversity". That retweet has to be taken as an endorsement of the view expressed.

See my explanation in the post above as to why just looking at the absolute number is not represenatative, You seem to be unable to grasp this. Robinson focuses on organised CULTURAL grooming gangs which is almost exclusively a Bangladeshi and Pakistani thing with a tiny number of other ethnicities. The convictions prove this. The girls were being pimped around the communities. He does not talk about "black rapist" or "Chinese rapist" for example, presumably because it is not an organised CULTURAL thing. That is the reason. It was BECAUSE it was an organised CULTURAL thing with two main voting groups that it was hushed up and covered up by politicians and councilors thinking of their votes for reelection at the expense of vulnerable young girls.

What matters here is not the absolute number but the number of rapes reported as a percentage of the population of the ethnic groups. There are more white British so you could have more rapes in total but it could be lower as a percentage of that ethnic group vs others. The omission of Lancashire in this context is material and also rather suspicious in the context of grooming gangs. We are discussing this in relation to grooming gangs so without figures for the percentage of Primarily Bangladeshi and Pakistani as % population vs % of rapes the figures do not mean much in isolation. According to the 2021 United Kingdom census, there are 1,927,150 people of Indian/British Indian ethnicity (2.9%), 1,662,286 people of Pakistani /British Pakistani ethnicity (2.5%), 651,834 people of Bangladeshi/ British Bangladeshi ethnicity (1.0%), and an estimated further 700,000 from other South Asian heritage ... So need to compare this with percentage of white British to get a realistic picture, or are you suggesting the absolute number proves something? If so then you clearly have no idea about data. Maybe somebody might like to get the appropriate percent of population for each delineated ethnic group and crunch the numbers to get a percent of population figure which would be representative where as the absolute number unadjusted for % of population is not, although I think the poster is unable to grasp this and presumably thinks the absolute number means something in isolation.

Does Edwards appointment predate that of the DG?

Ah yes, the immigration industry, don't forget all those NGO workers on nice salary and benefits. No wonder they are so pro immigration.

No longer any exemption from filing TM30 for 1 year extension holders returning on a re entry permit?

It's enough to make people want to pay for an agent to do it.

When/where did they notify us of this change, or are we supposed to "just know" as usual? Do we know what rejection message is generated if we try and do 14-8 days in advance? So if it rejects you, there is now NO CHANCE of using postal notification, have to go there and wait for hours as I did before.

I wonder if that is why I was rejected last time - was applying 14-11 days before. Rejected me as having a tourist visa when I have non O extension. This whole TM47/30 obsession and its GLITCHES* is getting really irritating - especially as it really only applies to those on 1 year extensions and millions fly in and stay under the radar by staying at addresses that don't report. I assume I will have to file a TM30 that matches my 90 day address exactly in what address line is in what database field - only problem is that it is entered by an IO into their system without reference to what is on 90 day form/field. I have it entered online but it is in Thai and as that has never been used to register me I don't see how it can be the cause of my rejection. Software can be judged on its error handling capability, the less it is able to handle errors........

Not sure about that one. Certainly I have never been asked for 'tea money' at CW.

I would guess to make you show that you stay at the address you are reporting by requiring you to also file a TM30 which may or may not need to be renewed on return. I'm beginning to feel I would prefer ankle bracelets to all this TM47 and TM30 filing.