thaibeachlovers

Do you have evidence that it didn't? As I wasn't in the room with him every day I don't know what he watched or if he did other things while the tv is on, such as I often do, and I assume you were not in the room either, so how can you make statements as if they were factual? Which is why I want you to prove what you say. An on the record statement from a named person that would have been in the room with him for 7 hours every day would suffice as proof.

A laugh emoji is not proof.

Trump apparently lives to be in the media spotlight. Those that decided to raid his place would have known that, so this is down to them. Without such to keep the headlines going, Trump's media exposure might have diminished, but they just keep on giving him ammunition to keep himself in the spotlight. LOL.

You think being in prison would be the end of him on the media- dream on. CNN etc need him to keep their ratings up. No doubt they hope this saga will run and run.

So, arrest him then!

You need to educate yourself about Trump before pontificating on such. He preferred to see things for himself. A good place to start would be Fire and Fury by Michael Wolff. Enjoy.

IMO it's everything to do with that, and they seem to be waiting a long time to arrest him, given they apparently knew what they were looking for, so one could assume it was something worth arresting him for. I suspect the charges will conveniently come early November. If I were a Democrat, I'd be sweating about the mid terms, and welcome anything to distract the people from the chaos bad times going in the US.

Blah, blah, blah. So many opinions that he should be prosecuted for so many different reasons but no charges laid. Just do it!

Reportedly is not, by definition, factual.

Prove it.

Ain't that the truth!

I don't even recognise the place as the same as when I grew up. Sadly, most of our problems were caused by politicians, from Holyoak to the present one. Some are caused by not dealing with them when they were small, eg gangs; others manufactured eg keeping thousands of unfortunates in motels for years instead of building houses. Unfortunately I see no light in the tunnel, no hope for better. Seems to me the problems have become to large to solve eg how could there be any way to build a hundred thousand houses and build better roads to cope with the current jams? We can't even create a decent public transport system, or recruit enough locals to be nurses. It does not surprise me at the suicide stats.

Just because you can't see God it doesn't mean God isn't there. Spiritualism allows mockery where it's deserved.

but they don't actually know, do they? We can't even see how big the universe is. We don't know, so God can't be discounted. I don't care what anyone else believes. That is their business, but I wish the anti God folk would stop telling me that God doesn't exist, when there is no way they can prove it. It's just an opinion. I'd never claim to have proof as there is no way I can describe what happened to me to believe. I used to be agnostic, but now I'm a believer.

I was thinking more about the southern border fiasco disaster and the green agenda.

If it comes up empty a lot of officials are going to be looking really embarrassed. It had to be a big decision taken at the very top to raid a former president when he was already negotiating about the documents.

Indeed, thanks Joe. The GOP needed something to remind them of why they need to win the house and stop Biden's agenda.

LOL. They tried to get him for something even before he was elected and for his entire presidency, but never succeeded. I reckon this will go the same way. IMO the longer it goes on the more chance of no arrest, but if he is it should be a very interesting court case, and lots of opportunity to rubbish the Dems. Anyway, once the Dems lose the house, if he hasn't already been arrested the entire case might just quietly disappear.

I read it way back and can't remember what publication it was in. The people that would know have likely passed away by now. Does it really matter anyway, It was just a remark of no significance? "Nuff said on that I think. Now back to the drains of today.

Some of us know why.

Probably before the 80s. Pattaya was growing in the 70s.

Here's a photo from Google images apparently of Pattaya in the 60s or 70s. Do you see enough land between the buildings and the beach for the road of today? I don't.

555555555555555 It was a fishing village till Vietnam war. Perhaps they had to reclaim the land because the land side was owned land with buildings, and not enough space for a proper road along the beach.

You think they should stay in and watch tv instead? Some years ago wading to the bar in Bkk was not unusual. Then they put in some big pumps along the river and solved that problem.

?????? If it floods they ain't doing the job, IMO. As I understand it the present Beach Rd was built on reclaimed land.