nauseus

Maybe.

He rarely says anything clearly. Therefore he should be more cautious in this case.

Great answer, you should apply for WH Press Secretary. ????

A reaction, to noodle's ridiculous post.

Hopeful propaganda.

All these wonder acts involve spending trillions that the US has to borrow to pay for, during an era of the highest interest rates for decades. Brilliant! Why do you think Biden's approval keeps dropping?

Why?

You do if you listen.

Biden will never "perform fine".

You are perfectly free to attack Trump but I think that it would be very difficult for you (or anyone else ) to demonstrate that Trump has been a proponent of lowering standards of education or culling critical thinking. And sex changes for nine-year old kids? Not a chance.

Much worse. The EU President select is just the result of back room bartering, then given some apparent validity with yet another "vote yes" instruction to the EU Parliament.

war crimes (Trump also did a few) What are you on about there?

I suppose if it had just been a slip of the tongue there might not have been any complaint.

How much?

Annotated by your very own CNN, of course!

Only to be outdone by the Democrat Party.

Yep, over. We're out... and it'll cost far too much to rejoin.

I trust that all here are well used to that!

OK I'll try a couple later and see what survives the night.

Well that's about as non-specific as it gets.

Plenty of news but these sources are not allowed on here I think.

Yes, there are many stories out there. For months and years the most popular theme seems to have been anything which concerns the seemingly relentless political mission to vaporize Trump. The "incitement" word has been used far too frequently and improperly since J6 as far as I can see. Several recent house hearings seem to raise the question of actions of the DOJ and the FBI under the Biden Administration. But there seems very little news about that.

Lobbying is lobbying. Ads are ads. Your link, your post, your 200M.

Because Swalwell says so? OMG.

The graph title says 'promotional spending' - it does not say spending to control the climate change conversation. After 2015, oil prices and revenues dropped like stones, so your 200 million/year after that is just plain guesswork.