nauseus

Fair enough.

OK then, our opinions differ, as usual.

So I suppose you don't know how the dog you mentioned previously was treated or trained as a puppy? My bitch ridgeback grew up with us from about 6 weeks old. A gift to my wife, we took her in as a bag of bones but she turned out to be a good looking girl and was actually full (Thai) pedigree, which can make a difference. She was trained and learnt good behaviour but seemed to know the right thing to do in any case. Fun, loyal and very protective but would always give visitors a chance to show signs of friendliness, before outwardly showing any suspicion or aggressiveness. Thai people seem to know and respect this breed and most potential intruders or baddies probably just say "not worth it" and move on. It's always better if you bring a dog into the home as early as possible. Then be firm but give the animal the best life you can afford, plus plenty of love - then they are not likely to bite you.

The only thing this tells us is that Trump is actually awake most of the time - nothing like that can be said of Sleepy Joe.

That is the way according to the US Constitution. The UK Constitution does not require this separation of powers so rigidly.

You guess right. But I didn't say that it is.

Was it yours?

Great dogs. Best choice here. Still miss mine.

I don't accept that.

No time like the present, eh?

Your example actually shows two "copies". Versions of the 1911 are produced by several manufacturers. Which one is the copy??

How can I possibly compare this schematic to a grainy blurred image of the offending pistol.

A lot of flies circling that salad. Must be the heat.

That pistol looks pretty old I doubt anyone would go to the expense of making any cheap copies. There would have been plenty of this style of gun around in the 60's and 70's and Colts have been around forever, so it might be an old service pistol. US Vets. any ideas?

Members of the UK Supreme Court are more selected, rather than elected. You can read about the process easily via Google. Truss, like many, believe that the creation of the Supreme Court was an unecessary move by Blair, which effectively distanced judiciary power away from Parliament and the UK Constitution. This Supreme Court has only existed for 15 years and could easily be returned to the Lords as the (previously existing) Appellate Court.

If you say so, Doctor. Same time next week?

Truss not Trump. Jeez.

Anybody's guess.

The weak source is at the foot of the the OP. Even the biased MSM can't agree. NYT says he was dozing while CNN says he was paying "close attention". Difficult to do both. Bunch of jokers. https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/15/politics/video/trump-courtroom-new-york-scannell-digvid

Can we see this sleepy schedule then? I can't remember it.

Oh yes. These pages are full of such arguments. Yawn.

Well known fact. Right. Yawn.

Ah well, that's OK then.

No freedom then?

Pots calling...