Jump to content

DarloKnight

Member
  • Posts

    362
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DarloKnight

  1. littlebw, on 31 Oct 2014 - 10:24, said:

    I think it is time that any residents on Koh Tao to tell anything they know about that night - i know they wont tell the RTP due to mistrust but surely an appeal could be put out with an free english number to phone ( surely the parents / lawyers could do this)

    I cannot understand why there is no conclusive evidence showing nomsod on the island( photos , witnesses seeing him in bar etc)

    I am hoping that all British witnesses have told the police in england

    I cannot understand why there is no conclusive evidence showing nomsod on the island( photos , witnesses seeing him in bar etc)

    The island residents will never talk, and I think we all know the reason why. As for the tourists, they may not have known who he was and therefore won't realise the significance if any photos exist.

    What an exceedingly convenient explanation. Absolutely every single person living on the island will never talk. The friends of the victims aren't talking either. All out of fear or ignorance....
    Out of fear? Do you mean the people on the island or the friends of victims?

    Neither make any sense

    Neither does that, who did you mean please answer the question who did you mean with regards to fear?

  2. littlebw, on 31 Oct 2014 - 10:24, said:

    I think it is time that any residents on Koh Tao to tell anything they know about that night - i know they wont tell the RTP due to mistrust but surely an appeal could be put out with an free english number to phone ( surely the parents / lawyers could do this)

    I cannot understand why there is no conclusive evidence showing nomsod on the island( photos , witnesses seeing him in bar etc)

    I am hoping that all British witnesses have told the police in england

    I cannot understand why there is no conclusive evidence showing nomsod on the island( photos , witnesses seeing him in bar etc)

    The island residents will never talk, and I think we all know the reason why. As for the tourists, they may not have known who he was and therefore won't realise the significance if any photos exist.

    What an exceedingly convenient explanation. Absolutely every single person living on the island will never talk. The friends of the victims aren't talking either. All out of fear or ignorance....

    Out of fear? Do you mean the people on the island or the friends of victims?

  3. I think the interview Sean had with Scotland Yard will be far more important than the one in a tabloid newspaper.

    Just reading Mail on Sunday still no published interview with Sean. I have decided to email them and ask if one was done and when it will be published.

    I wouldn't mind betting that if an interview did happen the the Mail will have been politely asked not to publish until after the inquest in January

    He's not in UK boris he said he was in Italy, don't know if they will have been out there to him?

  4. Just reading Mail on Sunday still no published interview with Sean. I have decided to email them and ask if one was done and when it will be published.

    I wouldn't mind betting that if an interview did happen the the Mail will have been politely asked not to publish until after the inquest in January
    Interested to see mails response to darloknight though.

    Keep us informed darlo.

    Will do, don't expect much back from them but it's worth a go.

  5. I have foreign nationals working for the company I work for from the EU, there is a few weeks waiting time now and they have to go to the nearest jobcentre plus for an interview they do not get this via telephone or post. They are made to bring in proof of application for NI number so I have seen many appointment confirmation letters.

    Also they do not issue in cards anymore.

  6. the protected ones phone records would put an end to all speculation whether he was on the island or not that evening

    Do we have to go through this again?

    The phone records will only show where the phone was, unless it had to be surgically removed from his body.

    Good point as in my part of the world we just pick up any old phone and use that, so clearly if his number was being used in that area in the early hours of the morning anyone could have been using it.

    Clearly if it was your family member you wouldn't be expecting the police to look into this. Never know why police bother with such pointless information in the West.

    But this is looked into in must crimes as I quoted earlier the Dewani case the oscar case these were all examined not locations but records of calls and texts.

  7. Darlo,

    It is strange. A glaring hole in the conspiracy theorists basis for existing.

    Part of the problem would be finding anyone who actually had something to contribute. Anyone that saw a fight etc.

    I will admit you are right, I suppose no one is ever going to know the truth at this rate.

    I personally would take issue with this guy and another well-known and oft-ignored commenter referring to the vast majority disagreeing with his own spit-and-toilet-paper theories "conspiracy theorists." Using such derogatory phrases to refer to people you disagree with discredits your own views. His have been roundly, thoroughly (if not completely) discredited already, though he appears to spend 20 hours a day mostly trying to confuse the issue.

    You'll notice I'm not making absolutist statements about his views like he does with others. That's called thinking like an adult ha ha. I've personally put this guy on ignore due the very high noise-to-signal ratio in his posts. But he keeps popping up where others (mostly foolishly imo) engage him.

    Trust me, your sincerity in doing so is not being appreciated or reciprocated.

    I really do not care what jd thinks of me, since commenting on here I have been threatened with rape and called awful names. We are all are entitled to and an opinion and I can admit when I am wrong.

    I just want the truth like everyone else, I have a daughter and would be pushing everyone's buttons to find the truth.

    • Like 1
  8. Why don't the British authorities get a DNA sample from the parents of the two suspects --no need to involve the RTP I am surprised that the British media haven't done it themselves seeing the interest in the UK
    The British media have been very quiet no interviews with friends who were there at the time, also Sean gave an interview with the Mail on Sunday this as not been published yet! I get the feeling they have been told to hold off because they know more than us, I expect a big explosion with in the British media once the truth is allowed to be told.
    There would be absolutely no reason to withhold interviews and statements in the UK after all the people are home. In fact, it would not be legal to not allow statements to the press.

    This is a glaring hole in the conspiracy theories.

    So why not out Sean's interview to print?
    ask them?

    Funny (not) any way if I am right I expect an apology :)

  9. Why don't the British authorities get a DNA sample from the parents of the two suspects --no need to involve the RTP I am surprised that the British media haven't done it themselves seeing the interest in the UK

    The British media have been very quiet no interviews with friends who were there at the time, also Sean gave an interview with the Mail on Sunday this as not been published yet! I get the feeling they have been told to hold off because they know more than us, I expect a big explosion with in the British media once the truth is allowed to be told.
    There would be absolutely no reason to withhold interviews and statements in the UK after all the people are home. In fact, it would not be legal to not allow statements to the press.

    This is a glaring hole in the conspiracy theories.

    So why not out Sean's interview to print?

  10. Why don't the British authorities get a DNA sample from the parents of the two suspects --no need to involve the RTP I am surprised that the British media haven't done it themselves seeing the interest in the UK

    The British media have been very quiet no interviews with friends who were there at the time, also Sean gave an interview with the Mail on Sunday this as not been published yet! I get the feeling they have been told to hold off because they know more than us, I expect a big explosion with in the British media once the truth is allowed to be told.

    • Like 1
  11. the protected ones phone records would reveal where he was during the time period

    cant be that hard to "persuade" someone at DTAC,AIS,TRUE to print you out a copy

    You see this is what I don't understand, I know it's a different case and in a different country but the Dewani murder trial in SA at the minute are going through phone records and text messages, surely it can be done in any country?
    Not without a court order. That requires probable cause.

    No probable cause exists for someone that has been cleared.

    What about the accused phones?

    • Like 1
  12. the protected ones phone records would reveal where he was during the time period

    cant be that hard to "persuade" someone at DTAC,AIS,TRUE to print you out a copy

    You see this is what I don't understand, I know it's a different case and in a different country but the Dewani murder trial in SA at the minute are going through phone records and text messages, surely it can be done in any country?

×
×
  • Create New...