Jump to content

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    5,003
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by youreavinalaff

  1. I'm going to sound like your side kick here but, US is not the subject ofvthis topic.
  2. You said it's the long term that matters. I shared that comment. Not cherry picking at all. Not sad either. As for cherry picking, why do you only reply to some of my posts, not all? Why not post on all topics? Cherry picking. 5555.
  3. Not cherry picking. Just sharing your rationale.
  4. As Chomper said himself " it's the long term that matters"
  5. Thanks. So why accept their prediction but not what another poster saw on TV? Double standards.
  6. That is a link to the prediction. Not a link to how they came up with the figures.
  7. Finally you talk sense. So, in the long term there is no knowing Brexit will be/ is/ gas been a disaster for UK. Thanks so much for finally realizing Brexit cannot, as has been by you and many others on here, deemed a disaster
  8. I predict the UK will not be one of the worst performing economies this year.
  9. Thanks for the accolade. I love it that you deem me horrible for speaking the truth. You've even confirmed what I've said a few times.
  10. People is not the same as everybody. I did not say "all people". Example: Pattaya has gone down hill lately. Why do people still go there when BangSaray is only just down the road? Not a generalisation. Just a comment and question.
  11. Yep. So I was right. Not sure what your rant is all about. Being split for a short time and in that time your girlfriend got pregnant, well ............
  12. Yes, I did. In the second part of my sentence. After I'd already used the word "many". Hence, I did not suggests all topics have generalisations. Hence, once again, not a generalisation. Had I said " all people" or " everyone" then it could be construed as a generalisation. I didn't so it isn't.
  13. No. If I was generalising I would not have used the word "many". It would have been "all" or "every" or no adjective at all.
  14. There are, of course, exceptions. Usually errors on the part of the district office. The given rule is foreigners cannot be in blue book unless the have PR. .
  15. The thread is about immigration. You posted about Brexit.
  16. I don't understand. Who has to leave and from where? Once again, you are talking in riddles.
  17. I did. You put Brexit in the same bracket simply by posting it. History?
  18. Is it really that bad? Look at the comparison with the rigmorole of Thai extensions. My wife's English is average. She sails through the English tests. The life in UK test is more difficult but there is now so much help online. Her and couple of friends of her's have been averaging 20 out of 25. I believe leave to remain is in excess of £2000. Not excessive when you consider, unlike in Thailand, one can work legally on a spouse visa. My wife works in Healthcare too so she can apply for IHS payment refunds every 6 months.
  19. Especially as the maths doesn't add up. On another thread the OP wrote he had been on the "piss" in the village with another expat for "a few years". That ended "a couple of years ago". That would suggest he has been in the house for well over 5 years. The child is not his. Something going on.
  20. What has Brexit got to do with UKVI rules which, incidentally, have not changed since Brexit? Applications are not tedious at all. Takes all of 30 minutes to complete the application and a further 30 minutes to upload the documents. Once you have the visa there are no 90 day reports, no immigration visits, no TM30. Easy living.
  21. Read this link. There are a few answers there.
  22. Changed your tune. That wasn't the first question a moment ago. 555. Anyway, yes. It has been answered.
×
×
  • Create New...